When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Try running your 6.0L in 2nd gear at 60-65 mph. Please do.
That's 5200-5700 rpms.
When you're done picking your pieces of your rods, pistons, and pieces of the block up off the ground, come back and tell us how that worked out for you.
JL
Really? Are you messing w/ me? Where did I say I shift down to 2nd? If your refurring to my statement of a downshift getting 5k rpms. Then I don't have to shift to 2nd. I've shifted down after somebody pulling out in front of me and the tac shows 4500-5k rpms. I have a 410 gear set. 285 size tires.
I don't really feel like its any worse than things I already do to my truck.
Do you even realize what some of those sleds weigh and that the front plate is on the ground. Go try it once with your truck, van or whatever and report back to me.
You wouldn't believe what I've put the F150 I drive everyday through. It's been through hell,but it gets proper maintenance, and has 245K trouble-free miles on it. It wears a 400 lb galvanized steel ladder rack with 3-5 ladders everyday, 2 saddle type toolboxes in the bed, a single custom plywood tool cabinet that takes up the entire supercab portion,and usually has the passenger seat full of stuff, and assorted materials in the bed. It's a little 4.6L 2V with a 4R70W, and a 3.55 locker in the back. It's never had a wrench on it for a single mechanical repair-nothing, nadda, zip.I go out every morning and it starts and takes me to work, then back home at the end of the day. I've spent as long as 4 hours towing a trailer loaded down with around 6500lbs or wire at 65 mph on the interstate with OD locked out going to a jobsite, and many,many more trips withing an hour's drive doing the same thing or similar.
JL
Let's say you are in 5th gear cruising at about 2,000 rpms. At that speed and rpm a stock 6.0 is making a MAX of 217 hp and has a tractive force of 1,534 in 5th gear, assuming a 3.73 gear(and assuming you are full boost without downshifting). To go that same speed in 4th gear a v10 with a 4.10 would have to turn 3,084 rpm. At that rpm the v10 is making 260 hp and has a tractive force of 1,837. That is a far cry from having to be floored to maintain speed.
They do have the same transmission, but due to the rpm differences the v10 can always be at least one gear lower than the psd. Being able to turn more rpms allows you to stay in a lower gear longer, which helps you put more tractive force to the ground. That is why your truck pulls harder in 1st than it does 2nd, harder in 2nd than it does 3rd, and so on, even though the engine is making the exact same hp and torque at the flywheel. Gearing multiplies torque, which means you can have less engine torque but still put more torque to the ground.
Thanks brother for takeing time out and explaining this. But now I have more questions. What does my lower hp at 1800 rpms have too do w/ this? I have more than enough tQ and a short jump to peak tq at 2200 RPMS. HP is'nt the measure of power but rather how fast its avaible. 217 hp is more than enough seeing how the peak hp is 325 horse and its 1000 rpms after the the peak tq has be reached. Did Ford not program the stragy different for the diesel than the gas? I believe they did. So that being said, I don't see where the higher rpms of the gas engine has any advantage over the diesels lower rpms. It only makes sense that the programing is to take the most advantage of the lower rpms just like they woulld for the gas. So are we come to the place that the transmission make the v10 a better engine than the diesel?
You can put much more torque to the ground in a lower gear.
The V10 can run a lower gear than a PSD and will pull hills better.
Its not about whats at the flywheel, its about what it can put to the ground.
Dude are we back at the flywheel? I can't keepup. I thought we was in the tranny. I just want to know why the diesel would not beable to use the multipler. I don't care what they tell you. Your not going to out pull me up hill.
Last edited by phillips91; Sep 2, 2010 at 06:39 PM.
Reason: language
Do you even realize what some of those sleds weigh and that the front plate is on the ground. Go try it once with your truck, van or whatever and report back to me.
I know how a sled pull works.
what makes it worse than anything else?
All it does is load the truck to the point that your at WOT and spinning all 4 tires for a few hundred feet. Not good for the truck, but not that much worse than what lots of SuperDutys live with on a day to day basis.
I would use my F350 becuase its 4wd. I would gladly go do that and report back, but I can't find a sled pull. A few weeks ago I found out about one an hour and a half from me, and I found out a few minutes before it started. Plus my truck was apart at the time.
I know how a sled pull works.
what makes it worse than anything else?
All it does is load the truck to the point that your at WOT and spinning all 4 tires for a few hundred feet. Not good for the truck, but not that much worse than what lots of SuperDutys live with on a day to day basis.
I would use my F350 becuase its 4wd. I would gladly go do that and report back, but I can't find a sled pull. A few weeks ago I found out about one an hour and a half from me, and I found out a few minutes before it started. Plus my truck was apart at the time.
The sled pulls are very hard on the drivetrain even for the short distance they pull. If you do some searching there should be a regional organization in your area that where you could get some kind of pull schedule. It would probably be more of a benefit to watch several of them before trying it yourself. Up my way the pulls are fairly popular because there are quite a few tracks around.
Thanks brother for takeing time out and explaining this. But now I have more questions. What does my lower hp at 1800 rpms have too do w/ this? I have more than enough tQ and a short jump to peak tq at 2200 RPMS. HP is'nt the measure of power but rather how fast its avaible. 217 hp is more than enough seeing how the peak hp is 325 horse and its 1000 rpms after the the peak tq has be reached. Did Ford not program the stragy different for the diesel than the gas? I believe they did. So that being said, I don't see where the higher rpms of the gas engine has any advantage over the diesels lower rpms. It only makes sense that the programing is to take the most advantage of the lower rpms just like they woulld for the gas. So are we come to the place that the transmission make the v10 a better engine than the diesel?
Having lots of low end torque just means you also have lots of low end HP. With torque being force (torque) over a measure of time(rpm's) the only important measure of an engine's power is HP(unless you have an engine that makes torque but doesn't turn any rpm's). If peak engine torque was important in moving a load up a hill wouldn't our transmissions up shift so we could turn less rpm's instead of down shifting to turn more rpm's? That being said, engine hp and tq is pretty much useless once you put a transmission behind it due to the rpm capabilities of each engine.
Whichever engine is putting more tractive force to the ground is the one that is going to accelerate faster, pull the load better, struggle less, etc. The forumula for tractive force is TF=hp x 5252/wheel rpm. Wheel rpm is calculated by dividing your engine rpm's by your final drive ratio(tranny ratio x rear end ratio). If you compare the v10 to the psd in the same gear at the same rpm then the psd is going to win 100% of the time because it has more hp(because of more tq at the same rpm) and the wheel rpm's are the same, so more tractive force. What helps the v10 is that since it can turn more rpms it can run a gear lower, make the same hp, change the final drive ratio and put more tractive force to the ground.
Originally Posted by exiled
I just want to know why the diesel would not beable to use the multipler.
If Bill is in 1st gear at anything above 3,500 rpm you are going to be in 2nd gear. When he shifts to 2nd you are going to be shifting to or already in 3rd gear. The trannys have the same gears, but the gasser can hold a lower gear almost twice as long because it turns more rpms.
If Bill is in 1st gear at anything above 3,500 rpm you are going to be in 2nd gear. When he shifts to 2nd you are going to be shifting to or already in 3rd gear. The trannys have the same gears, but the gasser can hold a lower gear almost twice as long because it turns more rpms.
I am not reading all those comments, but seems to me you guys are forgetting about differential ratios.
If for example Bill has 4.3 differential and diesel 3.3 than on the same gear when V10 holds 3500 rpm, diesel will have 2700.
Really? Are there a lot of trucks ANYWHERE with 3.3 gears?
The 6.7 comes with a 3.31, 3.55 and 3.73. With the low 1st gear and loads of low end power I can see a lot of them rolling off the lots with the 3.31. But for what I was comparing (v10 vs 6.0) I would say there are 0 that have that gear ratio.
Having lots of low end torque just means you also have lots of low end HP. With torque being force (torque) over a measure of time(rpm's) the only important measure of an engine's power is HP(unless you have an engine that makes torque but doesn't turn any rpm's). If peak engine torque was important in moving a load up a hill wouldn't our transmissions up shift so we could turn less rpm's instead of down shifting to turn more rpm's? That being said, engine hp and tq is pretty much useless once you put a transmission behind it due to the rpm capabilities of each engine.
Whichever engine is putting more tractive force to the ground is the one that is going to accelerate faster, pull the load better, struggle less, etc. The forumula for tractive force is TF=hp x 5252/wheel rpm. Wheel rpm is calculated by dividing your engine rpm's by your final drive ratio(tranny ratio x rear end ratio). If you compare the v10 to the psd in the same gear at the same rpm then the psd is going to win 100% of the time because it has more hp(because of more tq at the same rpm) and the wheel rpm's are the same, so more tractive force. What helps the v10 is that since it can turn more rpms it can run a gear lower, make the same hp, change the final drive ratio and put more tractive force to the ground.
If Bill is in 1st gear at anything above 3,500 rpm you are going to be in 2nd gear. When he shifts to 2nd you are going to be shifting to or already in 3rd gear. The trannys have the same gears, but the gasser can hold a lower gear almost twice as long because it turns more rpms.
Thanks again for a good explaination. Please bare w/ me. I'm understanding whatcha saying. But I'm lost in how 1000 rpms makes a difference when there in go gain for me in those 1000 rpms. Tq is a very big key factor in getting a load moving. Hp is. Have fast the tq is avaible. I know what 2 is I've never been able to put it in words though. I'm not going to try right now.
We're not talking about my power band being 5000 rpms but can't get to those rpms. I make my power under 3500 rpms. There is no need for my truck to go that high. On the other hand the v10 makes its power over 3500 rpms. So it has a reason to go that high. I,m really trying to get my mind around this. What keeping my tranny from down shifting? Or me shifting down?
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.