When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Maybe you should make the drive from there to TX to put him in his place. Why does the pull off have to happen where you're at?
Or maybe you could meet halfway somewhere.
My answer to this question is I'm always working. I never get to play. I thought raising cattle and working at a grain elavator work be easy. Nope. I'm trying to keep tabs and if i see I'm going into an area that a member is in I'll offer to have a tow off on his home ground.
Maybe you should make the drive from there to TX to put him in his place. Why does the pull off have to happen where you're at?
Or maybe you could meet halfway somewhere.
Originally Posted by Fishin76
You'll lose if he has shorter gears than you.........no comparison. 3.73 in PSD, 4:30's in V10. He'll win, by gearing alone.....
Speaking of gearing, I was looking at 2010 6.4L with the snow prep pack, It had 3.55 gears! and a torqshift. ......
As Bill said, it elevation. The turbo helps compensate for much of that, while Bills N/A V10 engine is left huffing an puffing and producing less power than a 4.6L 2V.
I have 3.73s. Gearing does not make much of a diffrence when you are at speed, its just getting a load moving.
It does make a difference at speed. Lower gears keep you higher in the powerband when traveling normal highway speeds. (where is counts when towing.) staying higher in the powerband usually translates to less MPH loss towing up hills.
I wasn't saying you had 4.30's, that was just for comparison. i couldn't remember what gears you had, haha... That was the 'IF' statement... "If he has shorter gears" in my previous post.....
The 37 HP will more than make up for the torque. If he was running his truck WOT it would out pull you up hill, no matter the load. Starting at highway speeds just plays right into the V10s favor.
Why will he not load over 20K GCW?
No it wont. i dont have to run at WOT to be in my powerband. How does 37 horses make up for the 93 lbs of tq? I'm reminded of The 302 mustangs and 350 camaros. The 302 weighed in a 225 ponies while the camaro brought 285 horses. What your saying in the camaro will be there before the mustang could get out of !st. This is not true. All the mags shotouts has the to 2 crossing the line in a time difference we cant see. Now which 1 was in front well that depended on what mag you was reading. I ate up alot of camaros over the years and been ate by a few as well. It was the stangs tq that got it down field. I cant remember the TQ numbers but 225 hp was more than enough to drive the tq. At highway speed my 410 over 430 is a very very very small advantage. If it where that i had 373s i would have a larger advantage. Please I want to understand.
No it wont. i dont have to run at WOT to be in my powerband. How does 37 horses make up for the 93 lbs of tq? I'm reminded of The 302 mustangs and 350 camaros. The 302 weighed in a 225 ponies while the camaro brought 285 horses. What your saying in the camaro will be there before the mustang could get out of !st. This is not true. All the mags shotouts has the to 2 crossing the line in a time difference we cant see. Now which 1 was in front well that depended on what mag you was reading. I ate up alot of camaros over the years and been ate by a few as well. It was the stangs tq that got it down field. I cant remember the TQ numbers but 225 hp was more than enough to drive the tq. At highway speed my 410 over 430 is a very very very small advantage. If it where that i had 373s i would have a larger advantage. Please I want to understand.
Camaro vs Mustang in the 80's was all about weight.
JL
Why not, to push snow all you need as that low end torque to bend the frame up.
Seriously though, if a 5.4L with a 3.73 can do it, I'm doubtful a 6.4 with a 3.55 would have an issue.
I'm not saying it wouldn't push snow. it'll do that just fine. but it will do more upshifting with the 3.55's verses the 3.73's when towing/hauling. IMH0, 3.55's are balance gears anymore. A balance between power and economy. 3.31's economy gears, 3.73 - 4.10's towing gears, 4:30 extreme payload and towing. I had a 5.4L F150 with the 3.55's, it did ok, but I wished it had the 3.73's for a bit more kick in the pants.... I always thought that 3.55's in that truck kept the RPM too low for best MPG's. i think ford did it for acoustical reasons.....
I'm not saying it wouldn't push snow. it'll do that just fine. but it will do more upshifting with the 3.55's verses the 3.73's when towing/hauling. IMH0, 3.55's are balance gears anymore. A balance between power and economy. 3.31's economy gears, 3.73 - 4.10's towing gears, 4:30 extreme payload and towing. I had a 5.4L F150 with the 3.55's, it did ok, but I wished it had the 3.73's for a bit more kick in the pants.... I always thought that 3.55's in that truck kept the RPM too low for best MPG's. i think ford did it for acoustical reasons.....
I had 2 F150's with 5.4 and 4.10's, they weren't great in for speed considering the hit I took on mpg's. My buddy that has an F150 with the 4.6 and 3.55 would have smoked my 5.4 with 4.10's just because he has the new 6-speed and I always had the 4 speed.
I had 2 F150's with 5.4 and 4.10's, they weren't great in for speed considering the hit I took on mpg's. My buddy that has an F150 with the 4.6 and 3.55 would have smoked my 5.4 with 4.10's just because he has the new 6-speed and I always had the 4 speed.
I agree, 4.10's with a 5.4L and a 4r70w (updated AODE) is not a good combo for MPG's.. Your buddy must have a new F150 with the 3V 4.6L, the 6speed auto and 3.55's. The 3V 4.6 is only 25 hp short of the 5.4L and only 30 or 40 ft/lbs less torque, So yes, i believe you that your buddies truck would beat yours. 3.73's, by all the posts and articles i have read, were the best gears to have in the 2004-2008 F150's.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.