When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Like phillips91 said above, highway miles are very easy on engines. There is even a Volvo with 2.6 million miles on it. The guy drives about 80,000 miles a year in it. Mostly all highway.
It's not that I don't believe an engine can go that long, but I don't believe that it has been so trouble free or believe how fast he got it to a million miles doing what he does. As for the Volvo guy, what year is that thing? At 80,000 miles a year, it should be about a 1978 or so. A 30 year old car driving 80,000 miles a year? Not unless he does major work to it when he isn't driving it.
It's not that I don't believe an engine can go that long, but I don't believe that it has been so trouble free or believe how fast he got it to a million miles doing what he does. As for the Volvo guy, what year is that thing? At 80,000 miles a year, it should be about a 1978 or so. A 30 year old car driving 80,000 miles a year? Not unless he does major work to it when he isn't driving it.
The guy with the van has 1.2 million miles, and its a 97. That is about 92,000 miles a year, assuming he drives every day (after all he is an expediter) that is only 252 miles a day.
The guy with the van has 1.2 million miles, and its a 97. That is about 92,000 miles a year, assuming he drives every day (after all he is an expediter) that is only 252 miles a day.
Looking at the Volvo guy, I believe him. He doesn't claim ridiculous things like 55,000 miles between oil changes and that everything on the van is original.
The guy with the van has 1.2 million miles, and its a 97. That is about 92,000 miles a year, assuming he drives every day (after all he is an expediter) that is only 252 miles a day.
Two years ago that is about how many miles I was driving a year. I was going to Summersville, West Virginia and back(450 miles) on the same day two times a week. I was also making two to three trips a week to job sites and back on the same day that were 200 miles round trip. All of that was in addition to my normal 80 miles a day commute to and from the office. I wore out a couple of cheap gassers doing that(cologne v6's), but those things would break down if you just looked at them the wrong way. I can't see my 5.4 or my 7.3 having any issues with that kind of usage.
Edit-sorry, just noticed you have a 2.9 too, so don't take my comment the wrong way lol. I never could get one to last any decent amount of time without cracking a head or vibrating like crazy.
If turning 4500 rpms is going to blow an engine up then it isn't worth sitting in my driveway, much less towing my trailer. I have a 5.0 Bronco with an automatic and 3.73 gears and trust me, it has seen more than its share of 4-5k rpm climbs and it still runs like brand new with 217k miles on it. I have seen my share of gassers blow up by 150k miles, but I have seen my share of psd's blow up by 150k miles too. Ask Bill what happens to that reliable 7.3 when you don't maintain the coolant. Maintenance, more than anything, is the biggest factor in reliablity.
No one is arguing that the diesel isn't the better option for a semi. Though I doubt any of our trucks are going to be pulling the loads a semi is. Three of my most common towing trips are from Kingsport to Florida, Kingsport to Ohio and Kingsport to West Virginia. I can count the number of times my 5.4 hits 4k rpms on each of those trips on one hand. The rest of the time it is cruising in 5th at 2000-2300.
But at the same time, if gearing isn't important then why don't those semi's have a 2.70 1st gear and get the load moving with all that low end engine torque?
The trucks PO ran water in it and said that SCA's were snake oil.
Even knowing that I got it becuase it ran good and the price was right.
Third time I drive it the HG blows.
I thought it might be from my over revving it, but after taking it apart I could not find any damage to point towards that.
Originally Posted by phillips91
Bill has an IDI, but the same thing that happened to him happened to a guy I work with a few months ago and his is a 96.
The trucks PO ran water in it and said that SCA's were snake oil.
Even knowing that I got it becuase it ran good and the price was right.
Third time I drive it the HG blows.
I thought it might be from my over revving it, but after taking it apart I could not find any damage to point towards that.
HGs or cavitation?
I thought you said you had to rebuild yours because of cavitation?? You were looking for a new block for it weren't you?? The guy that I work with didn't even know what sca's were. He said it broke down due to "something called called cavitation" and when I asked him if he had been maintaining the coolant additives he just got blank faced and said "what's that?"
I thought you said you had to rebuild yours because of cavitation?? You were looking for a new block for it weren't you?
Thought it might be cavitation, but it turned out it was blown HGs and cracked heads. The blocks fine and passed a pressure test. I found a whole motor cheaper than the heads and now I have that good short block under a tarp and the new engine in the truck.
Originally Posted by phillips91
The guy that I work with didn't even know what sca's were. He said it broke down due to "something called called cavitation" and when I asked him if he had been maintaining the coolant additives he just got blank faced and said "what's that?"
From what I have seem most people don't know that there truck needs it.
The most efficient land engine wishes it could be anywhere near 50% efficient. Most diesels are between 35-40% efficient, more automotive engines are probably around 35, which the biggest stationary diesels are around 40%. Most modern gassers are 25-30%.
The most efficient engine in the world is a gigantic ship engine, also the biggest engine in the world. Over 100,000HP. It uses compression ignition, but does not burn diesel. It burns bunker fuel (No. 6 fuel oil). It is basically one step up from road tar, and requires massive pre-heating before it is even remotely burnable in an ICE.
Your right, I was quoting the theoritcal efficientency, the maximum those engines could reach. My bad agian.
Im saying if you ran an engine at its max TQ/ HP rpm constantly UNTIL i blows up, the one with lower rpm will last longer. Thats why diesel last longer also, they run at lower rpms which equals less wear. And ive seen a 7.3 almost last 800k when a gasser will last 200k when taken care of.
while I agree with you, but I think it's rather a moot point. For 95% of us, the truck will fall apart around the engine long before the engine fall apart, rather it be gas or diesel.
The other thing that will be hugely important is maintance, that will be much more important when the miles rack up. Either engine that is not taken of, will fall apart.
Two years ago that is about how many miles I was driving a year. I was going to Summersville, West Virginia and back(450 miles) on the same day two times a week. I was also making two to three trips a week to job sites and back on the same day that were 200 miles round trip. All of that was in addition to my normal 80 miles a day commute to and from the office. I wore out a couple of cheap gassers doing that(cologne v6's), but those things would break down if you just looked at them the wrong way. I can't see my 5.4 or my 7.3 having any issues with that kind of usage.
Edit-sorry, just noticed you have a 2.9 too, so don't take my comment the wrong way lol. I never could get one to last any decent amount of time without cracking a head or vibrating like crazy.
My dad gave me this 2.9 Ranger (he bought it new in 87), has a 146k on the original heads and 160 PSI on all 6 cylinders. The Cologne design itself is reliable enough in European trim (better heads, better cooling system) and is a 250,000-300,000 mile engine. Unfortunately Ford really screwed the pooch with the American version.
My dad gave me this 2.9 Ranger (he bought it new in 87), has a 146k on the original heads and 160 PSI on all 6 cylinders. The Cologne design itself is reliable enough in European trim (better heads, better cooling system) and is a 250,000-300,000 mile engine. Unfortunately Ford really screwed the pooch with the American version.
My last 2.9 (Bronco II) did great and got decent mpg's on flat land, but when I would take it to WV I would be wide open at 4,000 rpm doing 35 mph for many miles straight. To tell you how hard I had to run it, I would fill up in Kingsport and by the time I got to Bluefield, Va (110 miles of mostly flat driving) it would have around half a tank. I would fill up in Bluefield and by the time I got to Summersville Wv(100 miles of hills) I would almost be on empty and had to fill up again. Combine all that hard driving with the cooling and head issues they had and it didn't end good.
Anyway, you didn't see many cops in Summersville did ya?
I haven't been up there in about a year or so, but there were ALWAYS about 4 or 5 cops sitting where it slows down from 65 to 55 on the downhill section. Where someone put up the big advertising sign calling it a speed trap lol. What part of WV are you from?
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.