Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Superchips 6.0 Microtuner Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 08:22 AM
  #1396  
Brian460's Avatar
Brian460
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Paola, KS
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
When you plug your tuner in, it will give you a firmware version. What version do you have?
Vic, my tuner has Version 5.00 Copyright 2004
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #1397  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Brian460
Vic, my tuner has Version 5.00 Copyright 2004
If you have a harsh shifting problem, call superchips and tell them you want to have me fix it.

I'll update the tuner.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 08:49 AM
  #1398  
Brian460's Avatar
Brian460
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Paola, KS
Originally Posted by Brian460
I just wanted to jump in and send my thanks to Vic for the info in this thread. This thread is what made me go ahead and buy a tuner from Superchips.

The only thing that I have noticed is when the engine is first started it wants to hesitate and cut out (0.0psi boost) during the first application of the throttle, even with the engine warmed up.

Also around 35mph it wants to hang out in 3rd like tow/haul is on but, it is not this happens anytime I am around 35mph warm, cold on 5 min or 5 hours don't matter.

The shift thing doesn't really bother me, but maybe Vic could answer the cut out and hesitate thing.

Sorry for the long post and in general I love the product.
I love the way it shifts I just wish the 3-4 shift a part throttle low load came sooner.

I was more concerned with the hesitate and cut-out.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #1399  
SpartanDieselTech's Avatar
SpartanDieselTech
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
The turbo itself creates more than adequate backpressure.
Someone that finally agrees with me on this
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #1400  
Brian460's Avatar
Brian460
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Paola, KS
Originally Posted by PSD 60L Fx4
Someone that finally agrees with me on this

HEY!! I will back you all the way on that.

It wouldn't matter if it dumped straight out of the turbo!! Although it would be loud and the firewall would get really really hot.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #1401  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
Well, there is what the motor itself actually needs, and what the computer expects to see in terms of back pressure. . . .
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #1402  
SpartanDieselTech's Avatar
SpartanDieselTech
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
Originally Posted by Daryl Hunter
Well, there is what the motor itself actually needs, and what the computer expects to see in terms of back pressure. . . .
That isn't an issue that I'm concerned with NOW
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #1403  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Rhetorical essay alert =o)

Originally Posted by Daryl Hunter
Well, there is what the motor itself actually needs, and what the computer expects to see in terms of back pressure. . . .
In general, anything that is turbocharged would not be harmed by little or no backpressure after the turbo.

The truth is, changing exhaust on most vehicles that are turbocharged has little affect on backpressure, but has a much greater affect on exhaust scavenging (more or less the exhausts ability to flow,the velocity that the exhaust leaves at and it's ability to pull new gases into it's void.)

The backpressure generally doesn't change as much when you bolt a catback on a turbo vehicle, because of the turbo.

Why can a 1.75" header on a normally aspirated car make more power than a 1.75" manifold? It's in the bends, the flow, the smoothness. It allows greater scavenging.

Which brings me to why I'm so (personally) anti-flowmaster.

The efficiency of a flowmaster compared to , oh, lets say magnaflow is like comparing a stock manifold to a good set of headers.

Smooth bends, larger diameter (but not too large) and a direct route help make power through good scavenging.

Air traveling through a tube creates a vacuum on the intake side.
So, with that in mind, you want a pipe large enough to handle the volume of air efficiently, but small enough to create enough velocity to create a "suction", or scavenging.

Blow through a straw.
Pretty good velocity, eh?
Now blow through a 6" dryer hose.
What happened to the velocity?

An engineer well versed in airflow could design a pipe you can blow through to attain the optimal balance of air MASS capability and velocity to be as efficient as possible.

After all this comes the main point:
It is actually beneficial to have as little backpressure as possible. It makes power and lets the engine breath more efficiently. Don't worry about backpressure with a turbo vehicle. it will always be in surplus because of the turbo.

DO worry about scavenging when making upgrades.

What can really affect power output adversely with exhaust mods is poor SCAVENGING. The air must leave with enough velocity to create a suction to scavenge exhaust gases.

That's why a 7" exhaust is not better than a 4.5" or 5"...unless you have a silly stupid large engine with a ton of exhaust output.
 

Last edited by Vic_Ferrari; Jan 20, 2005 at 12:36 PM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #1404  
Customz's Avatar
Customz
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Utopia
But backpressure will affect how the turbo operates. In general, w/ less backpressure and more efficient flow the turbo will spool and turn faster than intended. Which is good for making power but not necessarily for reliability.

$.02
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #1405  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Customz
But backpressure will affect how the turbo operates. In general, w/ less backpressure and more efficient flow the turbo will spool and turn faster than intended. Which is good for making power but not necessarily for reliability.

$.02

Max boost is computer controlled.

Less backpressure usually improves reliability of the turbo. Is excavates heat faster, and helps reduce compressor surge.

$1.50
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #1406  
Customz's Avatar
Customz
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari

Less backpressure usually improves reliability of the turbo. Is excavates heat faster, and helps reduce compressor surge.

$1.50
I'd like to see those studies.

I know, I know, computers can never have a negative effect on anything mechanical, and computers are perfect because of this.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #1407  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Customz
I know, I know, computers can never have a negative effect on anything mechanical, and computers are perfect because of this.
Ha!

That's the second funniest thing I've heard all day.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #1408  
Planecrazy's Avatar
Planecrazy
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
What's the funniest??

...and where's my '05 6.0 SCMT? I've had my new '05 Excursion for almost a month already, and while I'm not disappointed with the stock performance I'm still chompin' at the bit to enjoy the fruits of the "promised land!"

Thanks,
Steve
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #1409  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Planecrazy
What's the funniest??

...and where's my '05 6.0 SCMT? I've had my new '05 Excursion for almost a month already, and while I'm not disappointed with the stock performance I'm still chompin' at the bit to enjoy the fruits of the "promised land!"

Thanks,
Steve
Be patient, it won't be too long.

Everything is going as expected.

That is all I can (or am able to) share right now.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #1410  
sv250's Avatar
sv250
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Kenner, Louisiana
Going with my brother-in-law to get his new 250 Saturday. I bet after riding in my truck the scmt will be his first purchase.

The only bad thing about my scmt is that I'm going to have to get a limited slip diff. I roast my tire at any speed under 45mph
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE