Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #9811  
Fishin76's Avatar
Fishin76
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Canton, IL
I also think that the guy in the video is under estimating the effect of drag on the two different trailers. the trailer on the dodge looks to me to have less drag via less surface area to direct air around. The test is screwy to me. Trucks that don't match option wise, different trailers, etc....

Pretty lame test......
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #9812  
Fishin76's Avatar
Fishin76
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Canton, IL
oops, doubled up....
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #9813  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
No matter how you look at it, the Ford just flat out lost.
Its still the better truck, but it has steeper gears and less HP.

My 2V V10 makes the same power as the F150.
The Ram would run off and leave it just the same.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #9814  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
I thought you could get max tow (you could in the 08's because I had it) in a Screw, but max PAYLOAD was only in the Scabs. Maybe they changed it though.
Yea it sucked in 04 and 05.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #9815  
David N.'s Avatar
David N.
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bucci
I found this video that may help make your point of some modulars not being able to go over 5k rpm. It's not of a SD, but it may help.

YouTube - Ram 1500 out-tows the Ford F-150

I don't think the new F150 went past 3900 rpm at WOT. After watching the video, it seems to me that the computer was limiting the F150 to not downshift and go at higher rpms.

The dodge was WOT in 2nd gear (1.50:1) at 4400 rpm.

What you do and everyone else think?

After watching the video, and looking up the tires size for the F150, I think the truck had a 3.73 rear, and was pulling in 3rd gear. This combo would match the rpm they quoted for every speed they gave, and I couldn't find anything else that would even be close with the rear gears offered. In that case a downshift from 3rd to 2nd (1.52:1 to 2.34:1) probably wouldn't have realistic. 3900 in 3rd would have gone to just over 6k in 2nd. Even 3300 would have gone to almost 5100, then the truck would have had to shift back to 3rd after gaining only 2-3 mph.

At 3300-3900, I would have thought the Ford would have still been able to accelerate, but it evidently couldn't. While a slightly lower overall gear would have gotten it closer to peak hp, it wouldn't have been enough to keep up with the Dodge. Basically, the Ford was beat by a truck with a more powerful engine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #9816  
David N.'s Avatar
David N.
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by exiled
I'm beginning to notice a trend for the gasser to jump in on a topic that suits their needs. Let's just be fair about it. If you going to question a diesel question a gasser to.
The diesel guys are no different. When someone claimed he knew the trucks were 6.4 diesels, Chargersfan jumped all over him saying he couldn't tell from the badges (when in fact he could). Someone else claimed to have passed a 5.4. The F150 he was talking about has an engine badge as small as the SD Chargersfan said was too small too read, but without the large, identifying red or black section. In reality, that truck could have had a 3V 5.4, a 3V 4.6, or even a 2V 4.6. Not a peep out of a diesel owner anywhere, because he said what they wanted to hear.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #9817  
David N.'s Avatar
David N.
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by exiled
No kidding. Even w/ his manual transmission he doesn't have a prayer.
His 1st gear 5.7 x 350=1995 lb
Your 1st gear 3.1 x 650=2015 lb
What happens when you include the rear gear ratios in the calculations? I think it would be a 4.10 for the gas, and a 3.73 for the diesel?

*Note that I "accidentally" left out 2nd gear.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #9818  
bucci's Avatar
bucci
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 843
Likes: 6
From: Jessup, PA
Originally Posted by David N.
After watching the video, and looking up the tires size for the F150, I think the truck had a 3.73 rear, and was pulling in 3rd gear. This combo would match the rpm they quoted for every speed they gave, and I couldn't find anything else that would even be close with the rear gears offered. In that case a downshift from 3rd to 2nd (1.52:1 to 2.34:1) probably wouldn't have realistic. 3900 in 3rd would have gone to just over 6k in 2nd. Even 3300 would have gone to almost 5100, then the truck would have had to shift back to 3rd after gaining only 2-3 mph.

At 3300-3900, I would have thought the Ford would have still been able to accelerate, but it evidently couldn't. While a slightly lower overall gear would have gotten it closer to peak hp, it wouldn't have been enough to keep up with the Dodge. Basically, the Ford was beat by a truck with a more powerful engine.

Thanks for that explaination. I didn't know what rear gear the ford had, so I was thinking it was in 4th gear and the computer wouldn't let it downshift; but I see from your explanation that wasn't the case.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #9819  
bucci's Avatar
bucci
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 843
Likes: 6
From: Jessup, PA
Originally Posted by Fishin76
I also think that the guy in the video is under estimating the effect of drag on the two different trailers. the trailer on the dodge looks to me to have less drag via less surface area to direct air around. The test is screwy to me. Trucks that don't match option wise, different trailers, etc....

Pretty lame test......
If you watch the whole video, you will see immediately after the first run they swapped trailers and did the run again.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #9820  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by David N.
What happens when you include the rear gear ratios in the calculations? I think it would be a 4.10 for the gas, and a 3.73 for the diesel?

*Note that I "accidentally" left out 2nd gear.
David I'm going to combine both my replies here cause I'm on mobile and haven't figured out how to put more than 1 quote in a post.
I've defended the 5.4 and the 6.8. I've strived very hard to prove that my psd has it's mark in the towing world and that neither gasser will out tow my psd. This is very hard for me cause I'm pretty dumb and even dumber with words.
I believe I was the first to say that the badges could be seen. Not a gasser. Unless a post slipped in while I was typing. I try to keep everything 1:1 as possible. I try very hard to correct my mistakes and things that I've said that was wrong or explain myself better. I don't see you exposing your self doing math problems or making video to support what you say.
I left the axle out because the engine and tranny in the 2 trucks is unchangeable. I don't know if you could order the 4.10 in the 6.4, but you could most certainly put it in after buying the truck. What's says you now. I have 4.11 in my truck. In 04 you had a quite a few rear gears to chose from.
The 1 thing that nobody points out about tractive force is that when we start out I'm working in my max tractive force. Its very easy to achive. The gasser has to rev up to or dump the brake or clutch in his powerband. We know what will happen. He'll either lunge and slip when he jerks the trailer or slip as soon as the power is sent to the rear. Which means - tractive force. This formulas is meant to find the maxium pulling power a system CAN reach. It doesn't mean it WILL reach it.to many factors hinder it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #9821  
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Originally Posted by David N.
The diesel guys are no different. When someone claimed he knew the trucks were 6.4 diesels, Chargersfan jumped all over him saying he couldn't tell from the badges (when in fact he could). Someone else claimed to have passed a 5.4. The F150 he was talking about has an engine badge as small as the SD Chargersfan said was too small too read, but without the large, identifying red or black section. In reality, that truck could have had a 3V 5.4, a 3V 4.6, or even a 2V 4.6. Not a peep out of a diesel owner anywhere, because he said what they wanted to hear.
If you're going to quote or paraphrase me, you need to get it right. I called BS on it because it was a LIE from the get go. Hook up the same trailer to a V10, and one to my 6.4, and that V10 is NOT going to pass me if I'm giving it all its got. After several other posts, it turned into the badges, but that was after the 3 "I can tell by the tailpipes" crap...Once I pointed out you can;t see the tailpipes if there's a trailer behind the truck, then it focused on the badges, and I still call BS on that. Mine look black sitting in my driveway. Of course, my truck is red though. If you fail to believe that, then look at the pic on my profile. Also, learn how to READ because the guy never said "they were 6.4 diesels". He said one was a 6.4 and the other a 6.0.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 04:57 PM
  #9822  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by exiled
Josh I know what your saying and to some degree tend to agree. Right before you said something to the newbie we had another that came in and said he blew 2 psds out the water doing all they could do and eyeballed their trailer weight. You didn't say 1 thing, but we did. The gasser said we was being unfair by saying he couldn't just guess the trailer weight cause they seemed to be like his. I'm beginning to notice a trend for the gasser to jump in on a topic that suits their needs. Let's just be fair about it. If you going to question a diesel question a gasser to.
You notice I didn't take up for the gasser guy when he made that argument don't you Several others took up for him, but I wasn't one of them. I agreed with what you said to him about eyeballing weights or truck types, whether the guy knew he was racing, etc, so there was no need to repeat exactly what you just said. So on that one, we agree.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #9823  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
So a 5.4 SD and a PSD SD weigh about the same? I wonder why some people talk so much crap about how heavy a PSD is... I didn't realize the 5.4 made over 650lb/ft of torque...Boy, that thing is a monster. I sure hope I don't see one of those up here.
What I was referring to weighing the same was the trailers that the 7.3 was pulling compared to the trailer the 5.4 was pulling. I wasn't saying the combined weights were the same.

Originally Posted by exiled
Josh really your 5.4 walks all over your 7.3?
Depends on how you compare them. If you do it in the same gear at the same speed and the same rpm, my 7.3 will win, but that eliminates half of my 5.4's rpm band(which happens to be where it makes the most power). If I compare them at the same speed but in different gears, with both starting at peak tq, my 5.4 will run off and leave it. From 0-60 the 5.4 wins. Topping a hill at a faster speed, the 5.4 wins. The 7.3 gets better mpg's and has to downshift less.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #9824  
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Originally Posted by phillips91
You notice I didn't take up for the gasser guy when he made that argument don't you Several others took up for him, but I wasn't one of them. I agreed with what you said to him about eyeballing weights or truck types, whether the guy knew he was racing, etc, so there was no need to repeat exactly what you just said. So on that one, we agree.
lol...that was my post talking about eyeballing the weight and type PSD's, and exile talking about "Did the other guy know he was racing"?...You were probably in the land of oxy-buzz.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #9825  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by phillips91
You notice I didn't take up for the gasser guy when he made that argument don't you Several others took up for him, but I wasn't one of them. I agreed with what you said to him about eyeballing weights or truck types, whether the guy knew he was racing, etc, so there was no need to repeat exactly what you just said. So on that one, we agree.
I'm sorry I didn't see where you said anything to that guy. I'll withdraw my statement.
I actually meant from a dead still, or going down the highway like in the ram and Ford video. Will your 5.4 take off and leave it? I'm not taking on paper or trick work outs. Just simple nose to the ground back breaking work. Why I ask is because depending on what year and what unit its put in the HP where fairly close between the 2. The overwhelming difference is the 7.3's tq. Not getting on the tq kick I just don't know what 5.4
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE