Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 06:43 AM
  #8401  
Super08's Avatar
Super08
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by 2001400ex
Shhhhh, don't tell Josh, Bill, or Krewat!!!!!!
He he...I probably am still not forgiven for selling my V10 back in 2006 and buying the diesel.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 07:05 AM
  #8402  
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Originally Posted by bucci
I'm really not familar with the pickup dump beds so I'm afraid I won't be much help. A dump trailer is nice, but you need somewhere to keep it when not in use.
That was a thought too, but I'm usually pulling a 16' flatbed. I've got room for it, but don't really want another trailer right now.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #8403  
Sand_Man's Avatar
Sand_Man
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 4
From: Rogue River, Oregon
Originally Posted by 2001400ex
Shhhhh, don't tell Josh, Bill, or Krewat!!!!!!



Sorry to hear about your wife!

Yeah, I am stoked. I went to the St. Anthony dunes last weekend and finally got my boy that just turned 5 to dig it. The prior couple times at the dunes and other riding he didn't like going fast or up/down steep hills. But man, he loved it this last trip!

Thanks for the tips. We are staying at Driftwood. We plan to day trip to Winchester and/or Coos Bay as well for something to do.

I will say, my truck did really good last weekend towing the toy hauler. I was pulling about 10k with a lot of wind resistance, averaged about 70 mph, except for mountain passes where the speed limit is 55 in two of them. I got between 8.8 and 10.3 mpg every tank. Keep in mind the speed, wind resistance, and I was at 5,000 to 7,000 feet in elevation for half the trip and 3,000 to 5,000 the other half. So no "my v10 would have gotten 10 mpg" or "my 5.4 manual would have pulled that pass at 70 even though the speed limit was 55." (for comparison, my father in laws 2v v10 usually got 7 or so towing a 6,000 pound 5th wheel, never over 65, mostly at 60 mph on a similar trip.)
If you go to Winchester, make sure to keep an eye on your 5 year old, that place is a real zoo sometimes, I won't go back anytime soon. As for Coos Bay, I assume you mean Horsefall Dunes, it's fine but has smaller dunes, plus you get lots of locals out there, which makes every hill a meeting place . As for more tips on Florence, once you go down the sand access road out of Driftwood, kinda stay to the right and follow the treeline. That will take you to the bowls and dunes, otherwise you stay on the lower "dunes" which are pretty flat, but my kid loves them since they are perfect for a kid to ride. If you do that then you can get to the bigger dunes about a mile out when the lower dunes kinda blend in with the upper dunes. Lots of fun and I really wish I could be there. Someday all the duners on the FTE are going to have to plan a trip somehwere we can all meet, I think that would be a whole lot of fun! If my wife heals up as planned, I'll be at Florence around early March. Some friends are coming over from Nevada at that time, and although I'm not much on wet sand, it'll have to do.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #8404  
2001400ex's Avatar
2001400ex
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by Sand_Man
If you go to Winchester, make sure to keep an eye on your 5 year old, that place is a real zoo sometimes, I won't go back anytime soon. As for Coos Bay, I assume you mean Horsefall Dunes, it's fine but has smaller dunes, plus you get lots of locals out there, which makes every hill a meeting place . As for more tips on Florence, once you go down the sand access road out of Driftwood, kinda stay to the right and follow the treeline. That will take you to the bowls and dunes, otherwise you stay on the lower "dunes" which are pretty flat, but my kid loves them since they are perfect for a kid to ride. If you do that then you can get to the bigger dunes about a mile out when the lower dunes kinda blend in with the upper dunes. Lots of fun and I really wish I could be there. Someday all the duners on the FTE are going to have to plan a trip somehwere we can all meet, I think that would be a whole lot of fun! If my wife heals up as planned, I'll be at Florence around early March. Some friends are coming over from Nevada at that time, and although I'm not much on wet sand, it'll have to do.
Yeah, I imagine this trip will be a little tougher for my boy. In St. Anthony, I ride mostly with dirt bikers and where we go in the big dunes, hardly anyone goes. There are a lot of 500 foot tall bowls that no one touches. So we can stop and he gets out and plays with his cousin who is a month older. There is plenty of room and little worry of anyone outside of our group blasting by and hitting them. So we will check them out on Monday probably, when it should be not quite as busy.

Again, thanks for the info! We should have a meet and greet. Really, I give people a ration of chit (yeah you Josh, Bill, and Krewat) but I think it would be cool for us to get together. My schedule is weird, so things can be tough. I got laid off in July and now I a contracting with the same company in Albuquerque for a few months, then going out on my own. So, next spring, I might be really busy building a business or broke sitting at home. Hopefully it is somewhere in between!!!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #8405  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by exiled
Man I wouldn't. Don't get me wrong I think its an awsome engine and before I got my psd I would have agreed. The 5.4 just doesn't have the tq. Why don't you shift your auto like a manual.
It's not about shifting it like a manual, it's about the manual having a low 1st gear and the automatic doesn't. The 5.4 has less tq, but when you use gearing to multiply tq a 5.4 will put more tq to the ground in 1st with a manual than a psd will in 1st with an automatic. 1st gear on a manual is 5.72 and 1st on a TS auto is 3.11. That makes a huge difference in getting a load moving.

Originally Posted by 2001400ex
A few hang out and make comments like "a 3v v10 will out pull a 6.4" or "I would rather have a manual 5.4 than automatic 6.0".
Go back and read what I said again. I said "for his application" I would choose a 5.4 with a manual over a psd with an automatic. He was talking about doing heavy hauling on a farm. You are looking at 10 mph tops doing farm work around here. My 5.4 can do 25 mph in 1st gear, which is more than enough for what he would be using it for.

Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
What, so the guy WITH a 3V V10 who says it can't hang with a 6.4 isn't good enough for you? you have to find someone who doesn't own one to ask the same old tired "Have you ever....?" question?
It could also be possible that the guy with the 3v v10 was afraid to run it past 3,000 rpm. There was another guy on here a while back talking about what a dog his v10 was and come to find out he was an ex 6.0 owner that was afraid to turn his v10 over 3,000 rpms because he thought it might blow it up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #8406  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Originally Posted by phillips91
It's not about shifting it like a manual, it's about the manual having a low 1st gear and the automatic doesn't. The 5.4 has less tq, but when you use gearing to multiply tq a 5.4 will put more tq to the ground in 1st with a manual than a psd will in 1st with an automatic. 1st gear on a manual is 5.72 and 1st on a TS auto is 3.11. That makes a huge difference in getting a load moving. .
Tell me about it. I already posted my experience when my 7.3 blow the differential and I had to rent F550 with 6.0 and automatic. That thing not only almost cost me couple of accidents when it took 20 seconds to pull my trailer via intersections, but after night at motel it would not move the 14k trailer up the driveway. I had to back up on flatter spot to gain some momentum. Would I not have the space behind, I would have to call towing just to start moving.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #8407  
jojolima's Avatar
jojolima
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
The V10 is designed to run at a higher RPM. Those that are afraid to run this engine at a higher RPM are missing the value of this powerplant.

That is why the V10 has a higher rear end ratio. 4:10 and 4:30 in a pick up. Much higher in a motorhome--bigger tires.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #8408  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Tell me about it. I already posted my experience when my 7.3 blow the differential and I had to rent F550 with 6.0 and automatic.
This is what I don't understand about this thread. You take a 7.3 that has much less hp and tq than a 6.0 and argue that it can get a load moving a lot easier than the 6.0 that you drove and say that it wasn't even close. The only reason it is getting the load moving easier is because of the tranny gearing. You are proving exactly what the gasser guys have been saying about how gearing can make an engine with less power get a load moving easier. But you fight tooth and nail against the gasser guys when that same argument says that a gasser with better gearing can get a load moving easier than a psd with worse gearing.

Just for giggles, let's do some math. Your 7.3 has 190 hp and 500 tq at 2,000 rpm. The 6.0 that you drove has 217 hp and 570 tq at 2,000 rpm. Comparing your truck to that 6.0, at 2,000 rpm in 1st gear, the tractive force is 13,859 for your 7.3 and 8,634 for the 6.0(assuming it had a 4.88 too). Your engine is much less powerful, but yet it still puts down pretty close to twice the power getting a load moving, which you have verified yourself by pulling the same trailer with both.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 05:21 PM
  #8409  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by exiled
They are not bullet proof.keep the gas petal on the floor and you will find out soon enough.
I have a 92 model 5.0 with 220k miles on it and many of those miles have been at WOT or above 3,500 rpms(lots of long 8-10% hills). It doesn't smoke, burn oil or have any problems and everything on it is stock. The only things I have had to replace are the throttle position sensor and fuel pressure regulator. The modulars are built a lot better than the 5.0, so I see no reason why it wouldn't last just as long or longer.

Originally Posted by bill11012
Did you ever think about why so many people with 4.6/5.4/6.8s think that?
Because the modular forums are full of quotes like the following-

Originally Posted by AzPete
My work van, a '02, E350 15 pass. with a 5.4 just turned 406,000 miles this week. NO engine problems at all. This is the second van with this type use. The first was a '99 and we sold it with 475,000 miles on it with no major problems ever. Most engine work it had was an alternator at 333,000 miles.
Originally Posted by jethro b
I do expediting and know many owner/operators that have seen more than 500,000 miles from the 5.4 triton motors. I'm at 385K and still running 10W40 GTX year round.
Originally Posted by massdog_FX4
97 f150 reg cab 4x4 with the 5.4 460,000 miles never anything except for oil changes every 3500-5000miles
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #8410  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Originally Posted by phillips91
Just for giggles, let's do some math. Your 7.3 has 190 hp and 500 tq at 2,000 rpm. The 6.0 that you drove has 217 hp and 570 tq at 2,000 rpm. Comparing your truck to that 6.0, at 2,000 rpm in 1st gear, the tractive force is 13,859 for your 7.3 and 8,634 for the 6.0(assuming it had a 4.88 too). Your engine is much less powerful, but yet it still puts down pretty close to twice the power getting a load moving, which you have verified yourself by pulling the same trailer with both.

Did you take those numbers from the engines charts? They look wrong to me. The 6 liter is high rpm engine and that was evident in just seconds after I got behind the wheel. While my 7.3 is pulling the 10k truck at 900 rpm on 4th gear, the 6 liter didn't have much torque at 1500 rpm. When my 7.3 takes almost all freeway grades on 6th even with 6000 lb payload, the 6 liter automatic was dropping 2 gears on freeway overpasses.
Than we can dispute the conditions of the engines. While my 7.3 seems to have excellent performance at 240k, the 6 liter was a rental with 40k.
I am not even going into mpg comparison.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #8411  
PorchFarms's Avatar
PorchFarms
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: West TN
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Tell me about it. I already posted my experience when my 7.3 blow the differential and I had to rent F550 with 6.0 and automatic. That thing not only almost cost me couple of accidents when it took 20 seconds to pull my trailer via intersections, but after night at motel it would not move the 14k trailer up the driveway. I had to back up on flatter spot to gain some momentum. Would I not have the space behind, I would have to call towing just to start moving.
I was with you until you said this. The 6.0 would pull 14k up any hill. i have a 25 ft gooseneck that weighes in the 30k range fully loaded and my auto will try to move the trailer if i let off the brakes. Plus i have 3.73 gears. You must have had a bad truck that was abused or something. if my truck gets over 2k rpms the tires try to lose traction and spin out and thats sitting on the bumper stops.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #8412  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Did you take those numbers from the engines charts? They look wrong to me. The 6 liter is high rpm engine and that was evident in just seconds after I got behind the wheel. While my 7.3 is pulling the 10k truck at 900 rpm on 4th gear, the 6 liter didn't have much torque at 1500 rpm. When my 7.3 takes almost all freeway grades on 6th even with 6000 lb payload, the 6 liter automatic was dropping 2 gears on freeway overpasses.
Than we can dispute the conditions of the engines. While my 7.3 seems to have excellent performance at 240k, the 6 liter was a rental with 40k.
I am not even going into mpg comparison.
I took the numbers from what Ford rates them at. The 6.0 makes peak tq at 2,000 rpm and peak hp at 3,000 rpm. The 7.3's peak tq has ranged from 1,600 to 2,000 rpm depending on year and peak hp at 3,000 rpm. I used those numbers because peak tq was a given and I could calculate the hp at that rpm based on the tq.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #8413  
coaler97's Avatar
coaler97
New User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
I just rolled 194k on my crew cab v10. I spit a plug at 180k probobly due to me changing them at 160k. I have also gotten 15.4 mpg if i hold the speed under 70mph. The truck is awsome.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #8414  
PorchFarms's Avatar
PorchFarms
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: West TN
Here is a picture of my truck hooked to my trailer The tank on the back has been replaced from 150 gal to 250 gal. Plus you can tell that water tank is not all the way full yet.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #8415  
tgreening's Avatar
tgreening
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by PorchFarms
Here is a picture of my truck hooked to my trailer The tank on the back has been replaced from 150 gal to 250 gal. Plus you can tell that water tank is not all the way full yet.

Did you by chance purchase your truck from Wonder Woman?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE