Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #7336  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Do you not understand torque multiplication?
A 5.4L with just 350 ft lbs:
350 x 5.79 x 4.10=8308.6 ftlbs to the rear wheels.
A 6.0L with 570 ft-lbs:
570 x 3.11 x 4.10=7268.07 ftlbs to the rear wheels.
Yes, the manual trans 5.4L will get the load moving easier than the 6.0L with a Torqshift. Your engine torque means NOTHING with gearing that MULTIPLIES the torque.
JL
Torque converters also multiply torque without causing excessive wear on friction clutches. I would have loved to have a ZF6 6.4L at out last meet, would have been interesting to see...
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #7337  
Fishin76's Avatar
Fishin76
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Canton, IL
Darn it, can't stay away.

Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Do you not understand torque multiplication?
A 5.4L with just 350 ft lbs:
350 x 5.79 x 4.10=8308.6 ftlbs to the rear wheels.
A 6.0L with 570 ft-lbs:
570 x 3.11 x 4.10=7268.07 ftlbs to the rear wheels.
Yes, the manual trans 5.4L will get the load moving easier than the 6.0L with a Torqshift. Your engine torque means NOTHING with gearing that MULTIPLIES the torque.
JL

Fundamental problem exist here, Your not appying 350ft/lbs at idle when your taking off in L gear. if your revving to 3000rpm to take off, your not going to have much clutch left in short order.

I can powerbrake the 6.oL torqshift and help my launch by spooling a little bit.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:29 AM
  #7338  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by dkf
Just make sure you arn't lazy shifting from 1st to 2nd with the manual...

JL how much torque multiplication does the TQ provide when its unlocked?
I believe for 5R110 it provides something like a 1.7x torque multiplication. Remember though, as soon as the transmission starts to spin the torque multiplication goes down.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #7339  
Jrfish007's Avatar
Jrfish007
Elder User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: WV
Originally Posted by Crazy001
Torque converters also multiply torque without causing excessive wear on friction clutches. I would have loved to have a ZF6 6.4L at out last meet, would have been interesting to see...
Crazy, did they total your last truck? Your new truck looks nice though!

I think for my next truck I might look for a 6.4 manual a couple years old and save some money.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #7340  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Fishin76
Fundamental problem exist here, Your not appying 350ft/lbs at idle when your taking off in L gear. if your revving to 3000rpm to take off, your not going to have much clutch left in short order.
Slipping the clutch for a few seconds will not hurt it.
Thats what it was made for.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #7341  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Lead Head
I believe for 5R110 it provides something like a 1.7x torque multiplication. Remember though, as soon as the transmission starts to spin the torque multiplication goes down.
Yes ,that's only up to the stall speed of the converter where the converter internally becomes a fluid "coupling". The torqshift converters stall very low when compared to a converter used in a gasoline engine vehicle with the same trans.
JL
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #7342  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Fishin76
Fundamental problem exist here, Your not appying 350ft/lbs at idle when your taking off in L gear. if your revving to 3000rpm to take off, your not going to have much clutch left in short order.

I can powerbrake the 6.oL torqshift and help my launch by spooling a little bit.
Even powerbraking to build some boost-your 6.0L does NOT have 570ft-lbs available either.
JL
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 10:49 AM
  #7343  
Fishin76's Avatar
Fishin76
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Canton, IL
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Even powerbraking to build some boost-your 6.0L does NOT have 570ft-lbs available either.
JL
Your correct, it does not. Never said it did. My point was that your only going to see that calculated rear-wheel torque number at peak torque on either engine and that it does not equate to faster take-offs.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 10:51 AM
  #7344  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Fishin76
Your correct, it does not. Never said it did. My point was that your only going to see that calculated rear-wheel torque number at peak torque on either engine and that it does not equate to faster take-offs.
No, the peak torque will not, but the values were plugged into those equations to simply illustrate the effects of torque multiplication and it's resulting acceleration benefit.
JL
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #7345  
Fishin76's Avatar
Fishin76
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Canton, IL
Originally Posted by bill11012
Slipping the clutch for a few seconds will not hurt it.
Thats what it was made for.

Slipping the clutch for a few seconds with no load is one thing. Slipping it from a start with the engine revving and a 10k load on a hill is another. More than a few seconds if you maintaining torque peak at take-off.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 11:45 AM
  #7346  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
I think the way I would do it would be to rev the truck to the rev limiter and then let the clutch out as fast as I could with out either spinning the tires or dropping it under 3,000 RPMS or so. Then when I ran it over the HP peak in first I would shift into second kind of half way power shifting. Keeping the revs up during the shift and then letting the clutch out over about 2 seconds.

Of course thats only if I wanted to get everything I could out of it. I would not do that in normal driving and towing.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #7347  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
I drove with stick shift most of my life and there are lot of trick that are different on different vehicles. On sedans in my younger years I would shift the gears with gas pedal firmly on the floor. That would give the car extra acceleration but with the cost of clutch life. Than most of the clutches can't handle full engine torque. I had a situation when with small car I was climbing extremely steep mountain road. The car died on 1st gear, so after sending passengers on foot, I said I will move it up no matter what. So I rev it to max torque rpm, kept it there and slowly released the clutch. After few seconds I realized that the engine is reving at max torque, the clutch if fully released but the car is not moving....That didn't burn the clutch yet, but definitely took some life out of it. Bottom line -I don't think this forum members want do do the trick I did when I was 16? Or do they?
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #7348  
2001400ex's Avatar
2001400ex
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
We can discuss this til we are blue in the face, but it will not change the fact that a 2000 5.4 4.10 with manual will touch a 6.2 with 4.30 auto or 6.0 with 3.73 auto.

The 5.4 is a dog in a super duty regardless of transmission, or gears or whatever math you want to put to it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #7349  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 2001400ex
The 5.4 is a dog in a super duty regardless of transmission, or gears or whatever math you want to put to it.
As with most of the rest of this thread, this statement is your OPINION.

Many people are quite happy with their 5.4s in a Superduty. YOU wouldn't want one, and that's fine, but for others it does what they ask of it. Same for the V10.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #7350  
Jrfish007's Avatar
Jrfish007
Elder User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: WV
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
So I rev it to max torque rpm, kept it there and slowly released the clutch. After few seconds I realized that the engine is reving at max torque, the clutch if fully released but the car is not moving....That didn't burn the clutch yet, but definitely took some life out of it. Bottom line -I don't think this forum members want do do the trick I did when I was 16? Or do they?
Depends... is it my truck?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE