When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yes I have a turbo car, I've felt the lag many times when I need to accelerate very quickly to pull out into traffic. You set and wait for the turbo to kick in like a deer in the headlights of the on coming traffic, then turbo spools and you're gone.
Apply that to what Kewart says, the diesel should be slower off the line while the turbo spools, then if both have similar power you would have similar acceleration, just the diesel would be 0.5 second (or what ever amount of time it takes to spool up) behind the N/A.
But the data shows the opposite, when loaded the diesel is the quicker of the 2. In fact Josh even stated his 7.3 will out jerk his 5.4.
Using yours and Josh's logic, if the diesel and gas trucks are evenly fast empty, they should still be evenly fast towing, right? Yet this is not the case. The extra torque from the diesel allows the truck to apply more hp through the tire to the ground as the payloads increase.
Tractive force moves a truck and tractive force is HP * 5252/wheel rpm. Engine torque only matters when both engines are turning the same rpms and going the same speed because the one with more torque is putting out more HP and being divided by the same wheel rpm, so it has more tractive force. That is why my 7.3 is so much better off the line than my 5.4 if I pull out in the same gear. Once the 7.3 shifts it is all over though and the 5.4 eats it up. That is not my logic at all. I said the diesel doesn't slow down as much because it makes better power at low rpms and doesn't struggle getting the load moving. The gasser makes much less HP(and tractive force) at low rpms and from a dead stop it takes a lot longer to get into its power band. So it will slow down more in a 1/4 mile race from a dead stop. Run them from a rolling start and you'll see much different results in how much the gasser slows down with a load.
In fact Josh even stated his 7.3 will out jerk his 5.4.
To put this phrase in correct context, my 7.3 will out pull my 5.4 off the line if I pull out in the same gear because they will have the same wheel rpm at the same speeds and the 7.3 makes more low rpm HP, so more tractive force. My 7.3 will do 12 mph in 1st gear, so from 0-12 mph my 7.3 runs off and leaves it lol. Once it shifts to 2nd my 5.4 smokes it. So from 12 mph to top speed my 5.4 accelerates better...... That 0-12 mph makes a big difference when comparing empty/loaded 1/4 mile times, but means nothing when driving under normal circumstances.
Tractive force moves a truck and tractive force is HP * 5252/wheel rpm.
Exactly, which is torque to the tires, not hp at the tires.
Originally Posted by phillips91
Engine torque only matters when both engines are turning the same rpms and going the same speed because the one with more torque is putting out more HP and being divided by the same wheel rpm, so it has more tractive force. That is why my 7.3 is so much better off the line than my 5.4 if I pull out in the same gear. Once the 7.3 shifts it is all over though and the 5.4 eats it up. That is not my logic at all. I said the diesel doesn't slow down as much because it makes better power at low rpms and doesn't struggle getting the load moving. The gasser makes much less HP(and tractive force) at low rpms and from a dead stop it takes a lot longer to get into its power band. So it will slow down more in a 1/4 mile race from a dead stop. Run them from a rolling start and you'll see much different results in how much the gasser slows down with a load.
Yes, I agree about the engine torque to some extent. Although when you are looking at an engine that has twice the torque it is quite a bit to overcome. I think in your case what you are observing is the difference between having a good manual and a bad auto. Haven't heard of anyone that loved their 4R100 yet.
I see your logic, but I'm still not seeing why the there is no difference between the gas and diesel empty, but a significant difference between them when towing in the comparison tests.
To put this phrase in correct context, my 7.3 will out pull my 5.4 off the line if I pull out in the same gear because they will have the same wheel rpm at the same speeds and the 7.3 makes more low rpm HP, so more tractive force. My 7.3 will do 12 mph in 1st gear, so from 0-12 mph my 7.3 runs off and leaves it lol. Once it shifts to 2nd my 5.4 smokes it. So from 12 mph to top speed my 5.4 accelerates better...... That 0-12 mph makes a big difference when comparing empty/loaded 1/4 mile times, but means nothing when driving under normal circumstances.
That makes sense. But the newer trucks (all with auto's) don't have a clear faster truck, at least from a rolling start.
The comparison tests show the diesels get a better jump basically, but then the acceleration on both truck looks similar once they hit 15 mph or so.
Exactly, which is torque to the tires, not hp at the tires.
I think in your case what you are observing is the difference between having a good manual and a bad auto. Haven't heard of anyone that loved their 4R100 yet.
I see your logic, but I'm still not seeing why the there is no difference between the gas and diesel empty, but a significant difference between them when towing in the comparison tests.
Tractive force is torque to the tires but my point is that engine torque is not even a variable in the equation, so it plays no role in determining tractive force. HP and wheel rpm are the only variables. Gearing can make up for lack of engine torque. Both of my trucks are 5 speed manuals with 4.10 gears, so there is no difference there. It doesn't take much tractive force to move an empty truck, so like the others said, the turbo isn't fully spooled on the empty diesel. That also means the empty gasser runs through that 0-3,000 low HP zone pretty quickly too. The more weight you add to the gasser the longer it is going to take it to get over that hump from a dead stop. Sorry about the lack of paragraphs but I am on my phone and it won't let me use paragraphs.
Apply that to what Kewart says, the diesel should be slower off the line while the turbo spools, then if both have similar power you would have similar acceleration, just the diesel would be 0.5 second (or what ever amount of time it takes to spool up) behind the N/A.
I never said it would be slower off the line. You brought up the "phenomenon" of a diesel keeping it's acceleration more than a gasser as it loads up with more and more weight, where the gasser falls off quicker.
That's the turbo. It's hard to explain, but at any one point in time during acceleration, a more-heavily loaded vehicle keeps the engine from spinning up as fast, giving the turbo more time to come up and provide more boost.
I'm not talking about "turbo lag" where you don't get boost as soon as you smack the go-pedal. I also suspect there is more going on in the PCM in terms of which gear you are in, and how fast the engine is spooling up.
Not sure of all the talkin that went on in nearly 500 pages, was just stopping by. Why compare apples to oranges and get sore about either? Both are strong motors, just very different.
Me being captain obvious:
The V10 has 10 pistons to help give it torque, the v8 psd has 8 heavier pistons to make up for the short coming. the lighter the rotating mass is the easier it is to rotate it faster - momentum and inertia.
displacement vs induction who gives a rip. the thread is a comparison so the fact is that the diesel is turbo'd and the gas has more cylinders less displacement. Can't compare and then set limits on what can be talked about. Each motor has its pro's and con's. Each is suited to a certain task well. Diesel engines usually have better fuel economy but I admittedly don't know too much about the tritons. Diesel engines can last a very long mileage but I don't know how long a triton will do.
I would worry about how much power you can get out of an engine, I don't like to keep something stock really. I know PSD's can be chipped extremely easy, and the turbos that come stock don't push high PSI (refering to the forced induction)
If I could own a PSD or a V10 I would love to have either. If my 87 f250 had a 7.3 DIT (or 12v cummins, dt466 ) running perfect I'd be a gitty ****
and before I get slandered for being a 'thick' diesel guy or w/e was said earlier, my other truck is a gas 61 econoline pickup...
I never said it would be slower off the line. You brought up the "phenomenon" of a diesel keeping it's acceleration more than a gasser as it loads up with more and more weight, where the gasser falls off quicker.
That's the turbo. It's hard to explain, but at any one point in time during acceleration, a more-heavily loaded vehicle keeps the engine from spinning up as fast, giving the turbo more time to come up and provide more boost.
I'm not talking about "turbo lag" where you don't get boost as soon as you smack the go-pedal. I also suspect there is more going on in the PCM in terms of which gear you are in, and how fast the engine is spooling up.
Hell, even I'll admit if my turbos aren't spooled up a gasser will take off quicker....unloaded at least. Once I hit my boost stage, it's over though.
Sorry but by the time your turbo does kick in you'll find it very hard to catch me if ever. And only if you have done some mods, otherwise it's a push even towing. Been on both ends with both engines.
Sorry but by the time your turbo does kick in you'll find it very hard to catch me if ever. And only if you have done some mods, otherwise it's a push even towing. Been on both ends with both engines.
Where are you located? I will pull with ya, even with my older transmission. LOL Sorry, but there is no test where a V10 has outpulled or even pulled with a psd except for one that ended up smoking.