When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The truth is that it is HP that makes torque, but commonly when we talk about diesels -we are talking about usable torque.
F1 engines have huge HP, but they peak it at 6 digits rpm, so how would you use it in city traffic, or starting at green light with 20,000 lb set?
A 1000HP F1 engine spinning at 18,000 RPM could be made streetable with the right gearing. It's simply too expensive to mass produce.
Good God yall here we go again. You can't have HP without tq. So no hp does not make tq. If that was the case you would have hp peaking before tq. You start with tq add movement rpm you start creating hp. Tqxrpm/5252=hp. No 1500 ftlbs at 1 rpm doesn't get you very but why does it have to stop there? Take a rusted bolt. It takes 1500 lbs to bust it loose you start turn faster loosing tq gaining rpms creating hp damn the got my nut off. Its the same way with the engine. Low rpm tq isn't a short coming neither is higher rpm tq an advantage. Its 2 different systems. You might like to turn those rpms taking off I like putting it in drive and at idel the truck starts creeping forward. I do not need higher rpms. I can travel just as fast as you can in the limits of my gearing. That's nothing to do w/ my engines rpm range. Yalls rpm range is only 1000 rpm higher. Its not like that's a big deal.
I was down in Weaverville CA last weekend looking at an antique saw mill. It had a single cylinder 15HP @350RPM gas/diesel 64 inch (8" bore 8" stroke) motor running it. The thing was wild, you started it on gas and once it warmes up you switch it over to diesel. I wouldn't want to hazard a guess at the TQ output of that thing...I just know it would throw a 72" circular blade through a 36" pine log without breaking a sweat. It had a 50% overdrive so the blade was turning 700RPM.
the reason I bring this up is I have several 15 HP electric irrigation pumps at home. They have nowhere near the TQ of that 100+ year old gas/diesel contraption. In the race at the saw mill TQ gets the job done, just like everywhere else.
TQ gets the job done. But the amount of work is dictated by the amount of HP being produced. You can have a 50 HP/1000fl/lb vehicle move a 10K# trailer across the street, but it can't pull at highway speeds. It doesn't make enough power. Then you can have a 300HP/300ft/lb engine that can pull the same load on the highway.
TQ gets the job done. But the amount of work is dictated by the amount of HP being produced. You can have a 50 HP/1000fl/lb vehicle move a 10K# trailer across the street, but it can't pull at highway speeds. It doesn't make enough power. Then you can have a 300HP/300ft/lb engine that can pull the same load on the highway.
The truth is that it is HP that makes torque, but commonly when we talk about diesels -we are talking about usable torque.
F1 engines have huge HP, but they peak it at 6 digits rpm, so how would you use it in city traffic, or starting at green light with 20,000 lb set?
If thsts the case explain why the 6.2l makes 385 hp 400 ftlbs of tq and the 6.8l makes 360 hp and 480 ftlbs of tq. The reason you have that hp is because you had a certain amount of tq at a certain rpm. Not the other way around.
If thsts the case explain why the 6.2l makes 385 hp 400 ftlbs of tq and the 6.8l makes 360 hp and 480 ftlbs of tq. The reason you have that hp is because you had a certain amount of tq at a certain rpm. Not the other way around.
That comes from the fact that peak HP and peak torque are coming at different rpm.
I didn't compare the diagrams, but from what you posted the second engine is having much flatter torque curve than the first one.
How many V-10's will make it to 200K without a rebuild, and hauling at their max rating for 90% of the time. A people mover can make it. Punish it with heavy loads, and mountains, and it'll give up the ghost in about 100K.
What about this? Would you consider it a heavy load?
That truck would probably have weighed somewhere around 13.5-14K empty, and 2-4K more with its everyday load. And it may have been pulling a trailer, too. Don't know if it was in any mountains, but notice the number in the last picture.
Current engine designs, manufacturing processes, and EFI make engines last a lot longer than they did 50 years ago.
That truck would probably have weighed somewhere around 13.5-14K empty, and 2-4K more with its everyday load. And it may have been pulling a trailer, too. Don't know if it was in any mountains, but notice the number in the last picture.
Current engine designs, manufacturing processes, and EFI make engines last a lot longer than they did 50 years ago.
A bucket truck is a decent load. Neither of us know where it spent the majority of it's life, or how it was run. It could have poked around on dirt roads servicing poles.
Engines last a lot longer than they did 20 years ago.
So let's compare today's gasoline engine to diesels produced 35 years ago.
And? My point was that gas engines can and do last far longer than they did 50 years ago. Exactly how does a single car that has used three diesel engines swapped out 11 times counter anything I said? If each engine was rebuilt each time it was changed, that's an average of less than 260,000 miles each rebuild.
TQ gets the job done. But the amount of work is dictated by the amount of HP being produced. You can have a 50 HP/1000fl/lb vehicle move a 10K# trailer across the street, but it can't pull at highway speeds. It doesn't make enough power. Then you can have a 300HP/300ft/lb engine that can pull the same load on the highway.
What do you think you've said? Engine is turning around 262.30 rpms. Now you gear the transmission and rearend and you can have a nice speed for pulling that load around the trailer yd or rail up the track. The 50 hp s because the can't turn any faster.
Let's build this motor to beable to turn say 2300 rpms. Hp will peak somewhere between 1400 and 1600 netting our motor around 300 hp. I think we would all agree that would be enough rpm to to pull highway speeds in America.
That comes from the fact that peak HP and peak torque are coming at different rpm.
I didn't compare the diagrams, but from what you posted the second engine is having much flatter torque curve than the first one.
Its because it 6.8l makes more tq. I knew you was going to say something like that. The fact is that the 6.2l only makes 405 ftlbs of tq. It peaks at 4500 and hp peaks at 5500. Do the math. Its just crystal clear that the higher rpms of peak tq netted the higher hp. Now what engine do you really want to be pulling 15k with? The 6.8l. That's doesn't in any way say the 6.2l can't do it or wear out faster blow up in your face or anything. The truth of the matter is when you hit the hills nature starts taking rpms from you. Have some power down low sure helps.
Hahaha Bill I flipped the script. And you just thought it was psd vs the v10. Bahahaha
.....How many V-10's will make it to 200K without a rebuild, and hauling at their max rating for 90% of the time. A people mover can make it. Punish it with heavy loads, and mountains, and it'll give up the ghost in about 100K.....
War Story! I was in an RV park in '04 and was talking to another camper comparing our V10 SDs. I have a '04 250 and he had a '01 or '02 350. He used his to deliver 5ers and tagalongs all across the U.S. and Canada for a living. He had over 290k on the truck and it was still going strong. I asked about maintenance and breakdowns, his reply. "I just do the heavy service maintenance schedule and it has only let me down once. The alternator quit on a delivery from Midwest to the West coast and I was a day late" He may still be out there now, if so he has over 1 million on it by now. End War Story!
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.