Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #11611  
Super08's Avatar
Super08
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
We see a lot of things in this thread.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 03:39 PM
  #11612  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Broken mentality.
Claiming that a gas engine "cares" about a load and that it is working "harder" just because it needs more RPMs in some situations is not only wrong, but ignorant.
JL
Is it really? For who? If that engine is turning more rpm to get the load moving, maintain speed, or gain speed its doing more work.
Say I'm in my mustang. I'm going up a steep hill. I'm in 5th gear I'm slowing way down I put the gas pedal down but I'm getting nothing. No rpms or speed matter of fact I'm fix'n to stall it. The natural forces are stronger than the tq put to ground. So down shifting gives me a leverage advsntage then I can climb. I used my mustang cause our trucks have auto transmissions in them. Now by holding 5th I was using more fuel working harder than I was when I downshifted simply cause all the motor had in that gear wasn't enough. So the mechanical advantage of the tsller gear made the tq and got us up the hill. But dropping gears still is doing more work than the engine was doing before I got to the hill. I really don't see what your saying when you say more rpms is less work from the engine.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #11613  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
I think everyone could agree if the PSD guys admitted that a v10 CAN pull the same load,

And the v10 guys admit that it will not pull as nice.

Because that right there is the truth. As far as service costs, depreciation, and the like, I have a small business, and if the truck depreciates, costs lots to repair, It's all a write-off on taxes, so at the end of the day, any business using trucks for hauling or commercial use, I'd find it hard to believe they'd choose a gas job when a diesel pulls so much nicer.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:30 PM
  #11614  
jkidd_39's Avatar
jkidd_39
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
Originally Posted by parkland
I think everyone could agree if the PSD guys admitted that a v10 CAN pull the same load,

And the v10 guys admit that it will not pull as nice.

Because that right there is the truth. As far as service costs, depreciation, and the like, I have a small business, and if the truck depreciates, costs lots to repair, It's all a write-off on taxes, so at the end of the day, any business using trucks for hauling or commercial use, I'd find it hard to believe they'd choose a gas job when a diesel pulls so much nicer.

You exactly right. But tell me how many 7.3 guys have scoffed at your 6.4 when it comes to towing. I have had a Ton of guys tell me how there 7.3 will outtow my 6.4. None of them had ever driven a 6.4.

Sometimes ignorance is truly bliss. Haha
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:44 PM
  #11615  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by ScottyDsntKnow
the Powertroke has a WAY easier time pulling the same load
Think about this and define exactly how you determined this.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:51 PM
  #11616  
william_04_x's Avatar
william_04_x
Lead Driver
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,139
Likes: 209
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by ScottyDsntKnow
the Powertroke has a WAY easier time pulling the same load
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Think about this and define exactly how you determined this.
JL
Power Strokes don't spit out spark plugs when they're upset.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #11617  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by exiled
Is it really? For who? If that engine is turning more rpm to get the load moving, maintain speed, or gain speed its doing more work.
Say I'm in my mustang. I'm going up a steep hill. I'm in 5th gear I'm slowing way down I put the gas pedal down but I'm getting nothing. No rpms or speed matter of fact I'm fix'n to stall it. The natural forces are stronger than the tq put to ground. So down shifting gives me a leverage advsntage then I can climb. I used my mustang cause our trucks have auto transmissions in them. Now by holding 5th I was using more fuel working harder than I was when I downshifted simply cause all the motor had in that gear wasn't enough. So the mechanical advantage of the tsller gear made the tq and got us up the hill. But dropping gears still is doing more work than the engine was doing before I got to the hill. I really don't see what your saying when you say more rpms is less work from the engine.
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder. We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same. It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:23 PM
  #11618  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
Decent argument there Johnny, but I wanted to correct 1 thing that I disagree with.

Even non-turbo diesels usually had much more torque than gasoline engines, so they should still be able to remain in the lower RPM's longer.

If there were a v10 6.8 liter N/A diesel, I'm confident the shifting would be less needed than with the gas v10.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:54 PM
  #11619  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by parkland
Decent argument there Johnny, but I wanted to correct 1 thing that I disagree with.

Even non-turbo diesels usually had much more torque than gasoline engines, so they should still be able to remain in the lower RPM's longer.

If there were a v10 6.8 liter N/A diesel, I'm confident the shifting would be less needed than with the gas v10.
I've driven trucks with N/A 7.3L IDI diesels. Even with more than DOUBLE the compression(21.5:1 vs 9.2:1 on the 6.8L V10), they were absolute pigs and would slow down on the slightest inclines(remember, I live in SE Texas that doesn't have many "hills", so these aren't "big" inclines by definition),and would be struggling to maintain 60-65 mph with a small cargo load. You also needed a sundial to clock them to 60 mph. They did do slightly better on fuel mileage than the same trucks used the same way that were equipped with the 7.5L V8, but the gas engine trucks would run circles around them.Those 7.3L N/A engines made 185hp@3000 rpms and 360 ft-lbs @1400. The 7.5L's were 235hp/390 ft-lbs.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:57 PM
  #11620  
william_04_x's Avatar
william_04_x
Lead Driver
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,139
Likes: 209
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder.
No it doesn't mean it's working harder, just spinning faster, contributing to wear.

Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same.
Turbo diesels also have the advantage under load because of the turbo. The fuel, and high compression ratio's of diesel engines also contribute to the amount of torque they generate. The turbo is increasing the amount of air in each cylinder, so you can burn more fuel during the combustion event, which creates higher cylinder pressures(torque).

Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
Basically, yes. Boost rules.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 07:53 PM
  #11621  
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
PSD's are better!

YouTube - ‪2002 Ford F-250 Powerstroke Diesel Pulls Semi‬‏
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #11622  
Super08's Avatar
Super08
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
That is just a case of having enough traction to move it. A 4.6 gas could have done that. When I used to haul freight we would pull our trucks all the time when they spun out with the bosses 4wd.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 08:50 PM
  #11623  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder. We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same. It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
Brother we're just on 2 different pages. I didn't say the 6.8l was weaker
Cause its power was at a higher rpm. Never have I said that. If I'm going to say anything the 6.8 is weaker just because it is at any rpm depending on which psd your comparing. Its 110 ftlbs weaker than the 6.0l and 200 less than the 6.4.
Now I didn't say the 6.8 didn't have enough tq to move the load. You keep forgetting I'm not bashing on the gassers.
I'm not comparing the 6.8 to the 6.0. I'm comparing the 6.8 to the 6.8. When I say the 6.8 is working harder when yoy raise it rpms. I would say thst a psd turning 1800 rpms and a 6.8 turning 3400 rpms would be putting close to the same tq to the ground. We've established that these 2 engines work different. I'm just saying your not replacing fuel w/ programming by putting in taller gears and/or raising rpms.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #11624  
p-nut's Avatar
p-nut
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Than there are things V10 will do and there is no way diesel can.
Don't think you will get diesel making 5 mpg on highway no matter what
Never seen a V10 with a blown head gasket. I've owned a 6.0 that has had the engine replaced three times before 37k.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 08:56 PM
  #11625  
p-nut's Avatar
p-nut
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by william_04_x
Power Strokes don't spit out spark plugs when they're upset.
Yeah, they just spit turbos, engines, head gaskets, egr coolers, injectors and your kids college funds when you have to repair it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE