When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Broken mentality.
Claiming that a gas engine "cares" about a load and that it is working "harder" just because it needs more RPMs in some situations is not only wrong, but ignorant.
JL
Is it really? For who? If that engine is turning more rpm to get the load moving, maintain speed, or gain speed its doing more work.
Say I'm in my mustang. I'm going up a steep hill. I'm in 5th gear I'm slowing way down I put the gas pedal down but I'm getting nothing. No rpms or speed matter of fact I'm fix'n to stall it. The natural forces are stronger than the tq put to ground. So down shifting gives me a leverage advsntage then I can climb. I used my mustang cause our trucks have auto transmissions in them. Now by holding 5th I was using more fuel working harder than I was when I downshifted simply cause all the motor had in that gear wasn't enough. So the mechanical advantage of the tsller gear made the tq and got us up the hill. But dropping gears still is doing more work than the engine was doing before I got to the hill. I really don't see what your saying when you say more rpms is less work from the engine.
I think everyone could agree if the PSD guys admitted that a v10 CAN pull the same load,
And the v10 guys admit that it will not pull as nice.
Because that right there is the truth. As far as service costs, depreciation, and the like, I have a small business, and if the truck depreciates, costs lots to repair, It's all a write-off on taxes, so at the end of the day, any business using trucks for hauling or commercial use, I'd find it hard to believe they'd choose a gas job when a diesel pulls so much nicer.
I think everyone could agree if the PSD guys admitted that a v10 CAN pull the same load,
And the v10 guys admit that it will not pull as nice.
Because that right there is the truth. As far as service costs, depreciation, and the like, I have a small business, and if the truck depreciates, costs lots to repair, It's all a write-off on taxes, so at the end of the day, any business using trucks for hauling or commercial use, I'd find it hard to believe they'd choose a gas job when a diesel pulls so much nicer.
You exactly right. But tell me how many 7.3 guys have scoffed at your 6.4 when it comes to towing. I have had a Ton of guys tell me how there 7.3 will outtow my 6.4. None of them had ever driven a 6.4.
Is it really? For who? If that engine is turning more rpm to get the load moving, maintain speed, or gain speed its doing more work.
Say I'm in my mustang. I'm going up a steep hill. I'm in 5th gear I'm slowing way down I put the gas pedal down but I'm getting nothing. No rpms or speed matter of fact I'm fix'n to stall it. The natural forces are stronger than the tq put to ground. So down shifting gives me a leverage advsntage then I can climb. I used my mustang cause our trucks have auto transmissions in them. Now by holding 5th I was using more fuel working harder than I was when I downshifted simply cause all the motor had in that gear wasn't enough. So the mechanical advantage of the tsller gear made the tq and got us up the hill. But dropping gears still is doing more work than the engine was doing before I got to the hill. I really don't see what your saying when you say more rpms is less work from the engine.
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder. We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same. It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
Decent argument there Johnny, but I wanted to correct 1 thing that I disagree with.
Even non-turbo diesels usually had much more torque than gasoline engines, so they should still be able to remain in the lower RPM's longer.
If there were a v10 6.8 liter N/A diesel, I'm confident the shifting would be less needed than with the gas v10.
I've driven trucks with N/A 7.3L IDI diesels. Even with more than DOUBLE the compression(21.5:1 vs 9.2:1 on the 6.8L V10), they were absolute pigs and would slow down on the slightest inclines(remember, I live in SE Texas that doesn't have many "hills", so these aren't "big" inclines by definition),and would be struggling to maintain 60-65 mph with a small cargo load. You also needed a sundial to clock them to 60 mph. They did do slightly better on fuel mileage than the same trucks used the same way that were equipped with the 7.5L V8, but the gas engine trucks would run circles around them.Those 7.3L N/A engines made 185hp@3000 rpms and 360 ft-lbs @1400. The 7.5L's were 235hp/390 ft-lbs.
JL
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder.
No it doesn't mean it's working harder, just spinning faster, contributing to wear.
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same.
Turbo diesels also have the advantage under load because of the turbo. The fuel, and high compression ratio's of diesel engines also contribute to the amount of torque they generate. The turbo is increasing the amount of air in each cylinder, so you can burn more fuel during the combustion event, which creates higher cylinder pressures(torque).
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
That is just a case of having enough traction to move it. A 4.6 gas could have done that. When I used to haul freight we would pull our trucks all the time when they spun out with the bosses 4wd.
Just because and engine is turning more RPM's, DOES NOT mean that it's working harder. We're back to discussing that load thing again. It's all about VE like IBAdrian was discussing earlier about fuel useage. The PSD has a VE advantage at "towing/cruising" RPM's ONLY because of the turbocharger. NOT because it uses diesel fuel. NOT because it uses compression ignition. It gives the driver a false sense that the vehicle is working "less" simply because they do not see the RPM's change as load increases. In reality, the turbocharger is actually increasing the cylinder pressure and increasing the "work" output of the engine even though the RPM stays the same. It takes a certain amount of power(work) to keep a load at a certain speed. Saying that a gasoline engine is "weaker" or "working harder" simply because it's accomplishing it's work in a different manner is ignorant. Moving the same load at the same speed takes the SAME amount of work, no matter the powerplant. A turbodiesel accomplishes this via more boost,and a N/A gasoline engine accomplishes this via more RPM.
JL
Brother we're just on 2 different pages. I didn't say the 6.8l was weaker
Cause its power was at a higher rpm. Never have I said that. If I'm going to say anything the 6.8 is weaker just because it is at any rpm depending on which psd your comparing. Its 110 ftlbs weaker than the 6.0l and 200 less than the 6.4.
Now I didn't say the 6.8 didn't have enough tq to move the load. You keep forgetting I'm not bashing on the gassers.
I'm not comparing the 6.8 to the 6.0. I'm comparing the 6.8 to the 6.8. When I say the 6.8 is working harder when yoy raise it rpms. I would say thst a psd turning 1800 rpms and a 6.8 turning 3400 rpms would be putting close to the same tq to the ground. We've established that these 2 engines work different. I'm just saying your not replacing fuel w/ programming by putting in taller gears and/or raising rpms.