Gas vs PSD
Parkland I'm sorry that not the case. 15k miles is the change ford calls for. In the 6.0 section a lot of guys believe and preach 5k oil changes and 10k fuel filter changes. I've gambled and went w/ the ford maintance shedule.
Your one-third would be a train sized gas engine compared to a psd.
Ford puts the psd in every SD under the f650. So did they just start doing this for the 11 model year?
2. I stand corrected with the v10 having been removed from the F-650-up trucks. '09-'10 trucks were available with either the V10 or cummins.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Can I be mistaken and they said f650 I sure can but what I saw on options it only comes w/ the cummins.
I won't swear to that. Its just all I seen on the option sheet.
Just to clear the air I was offered a gig of carring cattle to colorodo for a salebarn buying cattle for a feedlot out there. I was considering it and buying a bigger truck. I've pretty much made up my mind to turn down the offer. 1 I'm not giving that much for the truck. Not that its really that bad of a price. 2 I have to much to do around here to just head out west.

PS what do airplane engines use in Grams per kilowatt hour ,roughly, ?
What makes you say that?
my buddy owns a fleet of tow trucks (prob a dozen and a half, all ford from 7.3 to 6.7 [i deleted emissions and studded his 6.blows]) . runnin them 24/7, half the trucks he's had since he started the company 10 years ago. and they all have close to a million miles, some are even higher. . .they sound awful, theyve been through many trannys, but he still makes money off of them and will until they stop workin (hes already retired a few). . .even if that guy in that home-made link did make it to a million miles, what % make it even to 500,000? of course im not even gonna use a cummins as a comparison, plenty of big rigs have 2-3 million + miles on the same bottom end. thats pretty common practice. . .lets see that with any modular. . .(especially towin loads its entire life). as i said before, your modular v10 doesnt defy physics. lets say that guy went a million miles, no overhauls (he admits it runs poorly, and im sure it has for quite some time) thats not an accurate depiction of what the motors will typically do. its like the politicians who cite a prosperous company in times of struggle and claim the economy is strong, when most of the companies are hurting or going outta business. . . .(sounds like im not the one practicing propoganda).
EDIT: for kicks, i asked him what his highest mileage motor was, turns out its onea the 7.3's with 1.7million miles. 4 trucks are over a million. this is common practice for companies where the amount of money they make is correlated to the money they spend on new trucks. the longer they run 'em, the more money they make. im sure most of the towing companies have 1million + mile rigs in their fleet.
And as far as class 8 truck engines and 2-3 million miles go, you know they are nothing like a light truck engine such as a 7.3 or 5.9 cummins, right?
This thread is full of "Yeah but if i put XX gears in my v10, it will get better mileage!!"
Well pick one,
1. Are you gonna hang with the diesels and admit the fuel economy needed to do it?
2. Take better mileage at a slight towing handicap.
The V10 would not use 3 times the fuel at peak HP. If it did I would get much lower MPGs than I do.
They have listings for generators and their fuel consumption at 100% load.
They use 5.4L and 6.8L gasoline engines,and they're listing a few different diesels-but the specs on them do not match any of the PSD's.
Their SG100 6.8L 100kW generator at 100% load uses 507cu-ft/hr @2300rpms(roughly 14 gal/hr of LP gas). The hp rating at that 2300 rpms is listed as 147hp.
The exact same generator (SD100) with a 6.7L turbodiesel at 100% load uses 7.3gph @1800 rpms. The hp rating at that 1800 rpms is listed as 152hp.
Now, step up to the max size generator that's offered with the 6.8L-the SG150.
It's a 150kW generator that runs 3600 rpms. It uses 22.57 gal/hr of LP, has a hp rating of 224hp.
The diesel equivalent, the SD150 turns 1800 rpms, uses 13.5gph of diesel,and has a hp rating of 279hp.
Looking at these numbers alone, it's not 1/3 of the fuel useage, it's more like 1/2. But that's also comparing LP gas, and not gasoline. One must keep in mind that LP gas has a lower thermal output than gasoline, so it will consume more to make the same power. My best estimate is that the diesel doing the same work will use approx 60-65% of the fuel that a gasoline engine will.
The interesting thing, is that the diesel generator uses more and more fuel as you increase the load, whereas the N/A gas engine stays fairly linear in fuel consumption as RPMs and load rise.
The gas engine in this application doubled it's RPM's, increased the load by 50% from 100kW to 150kW, and fuel useage increased by 61%.
The turbodiesel when the load was increased by the same amount, uses 85% more fuel to do the same job-even though engine RPM did not change.
Standby generators are the most accurate means of comparing the two engines-there are absolutely no other variables. These generatoers are also rated the same for MTBF, and useable lifespan.
JL








