When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The E-series doesn't come close to the GCVW of a pickup and loaded trailer.
You're talking about essentially an over sized van.
There are vehicles in that class using far smaller diesels than what we have in these pickup trucks.
Not sure what the midsize e-series busses wheigh in at but the v10 is very common in the class a, b, and c motorhomes and they go well over 22000lbs. And have huge frontal area. And have a 5k toad (towed behind car). Those are factory ratings most people that dare weigh their class "a" tow combo are Often well over 26000lbs. That is 100% of the mileage on the odometer. What % of you psd mileage is at 25000lb or higher?
Dont hear many complaints other than horrible mpgs.
I could tell you a story of 1 man that used one for a hot shot business.....
I can too. His hasn't died. He's been hot shotting for 24 yrs and has never owned a diesel. He drives every truck until the repairs cost more than its worth. He buys gassers cause he doesn't know how to work on diesels. He has 345k on an 07 he bought in 08.
His gross is between 16k-17k.
Yea it can be done.
Not sure what the midsize e-series busses wheigh in at but the v10 is very common in the class a, b, and c motorhomes and they go well over 22000lbs. And have huge frontal area. And have a 5k toad (towed behind car). Those are factory ratings most people that dare weigh their class "a" tow combo are Often well over 26000lbs. That is 100% of the mileage on the odometer. What % of you psd mileage is at 25000lb or higher?
Dont hear many complaints other than horrible mpgs.
I've literally NEVER seen a motor home with high mileage. I'm sure there are some, but I simply just haven't run across one yet.
My grandma had a big one with a 351, but it was '88 model i think, only had 70,000 km's on it when it was just garbage, around 2006.
A friend has a bus style one, with an 8.3 cummins, again very low mileage. Looks 1990's.
I can too. His hasn't died. He's been hot shotting for 24 yrs and has never owned a diesel. He drives every truck until the repairs cost more than its worth. He buys gassers cause he doesn't know how to work on diesels. He has 345k on an 07 he bought in 08.
His gross is between 16k-17k.
Yea it can be done.
Wow, I just don't see why anyone would do that.
15 us mpg 23000
12 us mpg 28750
5750 gallons more for gas or 21735 liters of extra fuel, in the event of getting 3 MPG better mileage, which is realistic of comparing a v10 to diesel.
Parkland you are right most people only put 10-15k a yea on an rv if fulltiming and even less if part time. But like i said 100% of the time is at 26k gross and a huge flat frontal area. So a 50k mile rv has seen very heavy service which was the point in response to the argument it couldnt handle hard service like a newspaper box van.
This is the reason I choose a diesel over the v 10 is the diesel is more economical for me. Here is what i mean,
Average Fuel Prices Per Year:
gas diesel
2007 2.796 2.942
2008 3.246 3.814
2009 2.353 2.473
2010 2.782 2.993
Driving 40000 miles per year with the v 10 getting 11 mpg and the diesel getting 15 mpg. [ i got these numbers from my experience with both]
Cost per year
gas diesel
2007 10166.25 7846.31
2008 11802.46 10171.94
2009 8555.51 6595.49
2010 10115.35 7982.33
total 40639.57 32596.07
Now thats a difference of 8043.50 in savings by owning the diesel opposed to the v 10.
Alright lets say its time to trade at 160,000 miles, same truck, same options just different motors.
V 10 truck's trade in value at kbb 12675
Diesel trucks's trade value at kbb 16550.
Thats an increase of 3875 for the diesel. So yea it costs more to buy up front but the diesel saved me 8043.50 in fuel plus will yield me 3875 more in trade in value. [ the fuel prices were pulled from annual national averages for 87 octane and ulsd diesel. The mileage from my truck and my friends v 10. Both trucks see about same towing and just driving time.]
You forgot two HUGE things in your little comparison here. You paid a TON more for the truck and your maintenance costs are 3-5X more than a V10. That HUGELY offsets your little calculations here.
Thsi has been gone over literally 10,000 times in the past. The costs are a wash.
I think there are a few v10 owners here that are being a bit optimistic about mileage.
I just spoke with an old-co worker that does hauling on the side. He's been delivering portable toilets with his old man on 5th wheel trailers.
He says
2001 6.8 = 6 mpg
2003 6.0 = 12 mpg
This is not a heavy load, just hits lots of wind.
Unloaded he said 6.0=17 6.8 = 14
These trucks are running same trip, same time, same course.
Only difference is the diesel is a crew cab, the gas is a extended cab 4 door.
I don't know many people with a v10.
Maybe this guys 6.8 isnt running as good as some of your guy's trucks, but he said it is a nice truck though. I've honestly never seen it, just going on what he says.
Theres a business down the road, I'm calling them tomorrow to ask about this, I think they have a few, and they also have every brand of HD pickup there is. About 30 of them.
You are still missing few more points to compare.
-diesel is the cheapest fuel to manufacture, so hopefully the price will drop
-good vehicles run on Premium, that in some stations is still more expensive than diesel
-California gasoline has less and less gasoline in it. In the past, when still driving gas wagon I experienced about 15% higher mpg after filling up in Arizona >
Hope is not going to get you too far...
So becuase a vehicle was built to run on unleaded to keep the cost down, its not a good car/truck?
I think we can all agree that E10 is crap, but your fuel is not what it used to be either.
Originally Posted by Monster-4
We've actually done this 4 times now. See links below. We are planning a 5th meet in August. Be on the look out for the threads about this one sometime soon.
I know, but thats a very long drive for some many of us.
Originally Posted by parkland
The other day I was at a dealership looking at 150's for the wife, they had a chassis cab with 420,000 kms's on it, which would roughly be maybe 280,000 miles.
I test drove it for shnits and giggles, it ran just as nice as my 350 6.4 at home with 60,000 km's.
They said it was used with a 25 ft cube box on it on a newspaper deliver route, and the only repairs done were to a door handle, DPF replacement, and the fuel system at 15,000 because someone filled it with gasoline.
I guarantee you that a 6.8 diesel will never move a commercial vehicle that many miles, carrying that much weight day in and day out, and get the same mileage. If it was possible, people and businesses would be doing it.
I'm not saying that the 6.8 or gas motors are junk, I'm just saying they have their place. Some, like the 6.8 are great at towing, but not as good as a diesel.
Originally Posted by parkland
I could tell you a story of 1 man that used one for a hot shot business till it died, but this is only one story. His normal diesel truck got bad fuel, went to the shop for repairs for 3 weeks. Meantime, he's using his personal truck, v10 ford SD, to run his business.
These trailers we're about 14,000lbs average, some less, some more, mostly downhole drilling tools, BOPS, oilfield stuff.
He told me that the truck's oil turned blacker than his diesel, the mileage was way less, and the last time I saw him the valves we're clicking really bad, I don't know why, neither did he. IT still ran good, but just really bad valve ticking. This was a newer truck, that was in pristine condition, and began signs of wear in only 20,000 km's ( 15,000 miles?) of heavy use.
I'm fairly certain that the reason you don't see worn v10's everywhere is because people that are really working their trucks are smart enough to buy a diesel.
Lower mileage is to be exspected. How long was he running the oil between changes? I have a very hard time believing that any engine in the modular family could be worn out from 14,000 trailers for 15,000 miles.
My V10 has seen more towing miles, some of it with more weight than that.
Originally Posted by parkland
Wow, I just don't see why anyone would do that.
15 us mpg 23000
12 us mpg 28750
5750 gallons more for gas or 21735 liters of extra fuel, in the event of getting 3 MPG better mileage, which is realistic of comparing a v10 to diesel.
The math you just did comes out in favor of the V10 when you add cost new and upkeep..
Originally Posted by parkland
How the heck would you even hot-shot with a gasser?
I know all ours rely on diesel cardlocks at night when everything is closed; .....Jerry can? lol
The same way you put gas in anything else at night. You stop off the highway at a 24 hour gas pump. Do you really think you need a diesel to fuel up at night?
Not sure what the midsize e-series busses wheigh in at but the v10 is very common in the class a, b, and c motorhomes and they go well over 22000lbs. And have huge frontal area. And have a 5k toad (towed behind car). Those are factory ratings most people that dare weigh their class "a" tow combo are Often well over 26000lbs. That is 100% of the mileage on the odometer. What % of you psd mileage is at 25000lb or higher?
Dont hear many complaints other than horrible mpgs.
Easy explanations is, that having 100+gallons tanks in motorhome you don't have to stop for fuel several times a day
On the serious note as mentioned nobody buys motorhome for economical travel. Most of RV are driven in the range of 1000 miles a year, so fuel economy is not critical.
Than if you take a close look at low and mid-price RV, the builders priority is "cheap, cheap, cheap"
$15 bathroom faucets, $7 shower heads, body build with particle board and cheap siding. Most of RVs have body integrity so poor, that flat tire usually triggers $3000-5000 body repairs.
I guess we went far away from comparing Superduties?
I think there are a few v10 owners here that are being a bit optimistic about mileage.
I just spoke with an old-co worker that does hauling on the side. He's been delivering portable toilets with his old man on 5th wheel trailers.
He says
2001 6.8 = 6 mpg
2003 6.0 = 12 mpg
This is not a heavy load, just hits lots of wind.
Unloaded he said 6.0=17 6.8 = 14
These trucks are running same trip, same time, same course.
Only difference is the diesel is a crew cab, the gas is a extended cab 4 door.
I don't know many people with a v10.
Maybe this guys 6.8 isnt running as good as some of your guy's trucks, but he said it is a nice truck though. I've honestly never seen it, just going on what he says.
Theres a business down the road, I'm calling them tomorrow to ask about this, I think they have a few, and they also have every brand of HD pickup there is. About 30 of them.
I'll bet that V10 has 3.73 gears.... If it had the towing package it would have 4.30s and get better mileage. I was getting about the same mpg towing my 10k TT with my lifted V10 on 35" tires with 3.73. I just installed some 4.88 gears and my unloaded mpg went up by nearly 5 mpg.
Because if you used steel bodies on rvs they would weigh more than what any engine can handle.
FOR GASOLINE ENGINE
My bus conversion is all steel. Sure the 15 tons for old 318HP Detroit is not making it a rocket, but body with stainless steel siding had 200 more years in it.
And it did survive several flat tires as I can say from polished inner fenders
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.