Gas vs PSD
Injector / fuel system failure, Variable vane turbo issues, I attribute to the fact that people we're used to the older trucks.
The 7.3 didn't have all the emission junk on it, thus there we're fewer problems. There were owners that bought these for the mileage, or cause they liked diesels. The newer trucks are not as accommodating.
Again, this is a good reason to consider a v10 if you don't really need a diesel.
6.4L-Radiators, Rocker Arms, HPFP's, and more yet to be seen.
I know several Duramax owners that do not have any problems like this. And those engines have the same emissions "crap" on them as the 6.0L and 6.4L. Everyone that I know that has had a 6.0L has had at least one of the items listed above repaired/replaced(most have had multiples of those items replaced). Some of those 6.0L owners are now Duramax owners,and are happy as they can be.
JL
6.4L-Radiators, Rocker Arms, HPFP's, and more yet to be seen.
I know several Duramax owners that do not have any problems like this. And those engines have the same emissions "crap" on them as the 6.0L and 6.4L. Everyone that I know that has had a 6.0L has had at least one of the items listed above repaired/replaced(most have had multiples of those items replaced). Some of those 6.0L owners are now Duramax owners,and are happy as they can be.
JL
Yet, I've seen repetitive problems like I listed already with the 6.0L's.
JL
6.4L-Radiators, Rocker Arms, HPFP's, and more yet to be seen.
I know several Duramax owners that do not have any problems like this. And those engines have the same emissions "crap" on thhem as the 6.0L and 6.4L. Everyone that I know that has had a 6.0L has had at least one of the items listed above repaired/replaced(most have had multiples of those items replaced). Some of those 6.0L owners are now Duramax owners,and are happy as they can be.
JL
You can nickle and dime any engine to death.
Head gasket, with egr cooler and value with Oil cooler, Twice
FCIM
Mutilple Oil leaks, Bed Pans
Turbo over spon and took out the heads for second time. Left me on the side of the road with my family.
Other issuse, but not worth the time.
That truck did not have short trips and towed weekly hundreds of miles. So YES THE 6.0 do have problems stock. That truck pushed me away from diesel and back into gas. I am now doing the same thing with the v10. The truck has never had given me any trouble.
Yes Diesel to get better milliage but is it worth it?
I wish I would have never purchased a 6.0 and that is my recommendation to anyone looking at one.
If the 6.7 can hold up for 5 years maybe I will get one.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
You can nickle and dime any engine to death.
Post your Oasis-it doesn't really mean anything to me. My experience does,and more than 90% of the 6.0L's I've had direct experience with have had those problems.There's always gonna be the exceptional "engineering example" of an engine that will take just about anything that you can throw at it and keep on running-I've seen a few 6.0L's like that, and those guys, like yourself, cannot comprehend that the 6.0L is as bad as it is in most cases. I've seen them running around with 200+hp tunes on them towing goosenecks with 10K+ lbs of assorted loads for hundreds of thousands of miles, and never have a problem. On the other had I've seen them with less than 30K miles-BONE STOCK and without any heavy towing, and have gone through a set of head gaskets, an HPOP, and a turbocharger. I'm sure there were a few people that thought the 1.6/1.9/2.0L CVH used in the small Ford/Mercury cars was a great 4-cylinder engine. Ask anybody about them that's done any mechanic work over the years and they all know the cylinder heads are crack prone,and terribly sensitive to temperature spikes. I had one in a Mercury Lynx. It ran great when the head wasn't cracked. It's gone and I don't miss changing the cylinder head on it at all. It wasn't hard, but it wasn't cheap either.
JL
It's one thing to say you disagree. It's another thing to call people liars.
10/07/2010 - 108,022 miles to 5/05/2011 - 111,898 miles. 3876 total miles / 310.3 gals 87 octane = 12.5 MPG. 50% of which was towing a 26' TrailManor @ 4800# through Ar, Mo & La.
Running unloaded in Ar., 14.5 MPG.
Running unloaded in La., 13.4 MPG.
Post your Oasis-it doesn't really mean anything to me. My experience does,and more than 90% of the 6.0L's I've had direct experience with have had those problems.There's always gonna be the exceptional "engineering example" of an engine that will take just about anything that you can throw at it and keep on running-I've seen a few 6.0L's like that, and those guys, like yourself, cannot comprehend that the 6.0L is as bad as it is in most cases. I've seen them running around with 200+hp tunes on them towing goosenecks with 10K+ lbs of assorted loads for hundreds of thousands of miles, and never have a problem. On the other had I've seen them with less than 30K miles-BONE STOCK and without any heavy towing, and have gone through a set of head gaskets, an HPOP, and a turbocharger. I'm sure there were a few people that thought the 1.6/1.9/2.0L CVH used in the small Ford/Mercury cars was a great 4-cylinder engine. Ask anybody about them that's done any mechanic work over the years and they all know the cylinder heads are crack prone,and terribly sensitive to temperature spikes. I had one in a Mercury Lynx. It ran great when the head wasn't cracked. It's gone and I don't miss changing the cylinder head on it at all. It wasn't hard, but it wasn't cheap either.
JL
My truck had problems. Dude that owned it before me tuned it and raised the heads. I bought the truck w/ 30k miles w/ new heads for $30k. That was the same price of an 04 w/ 5.4 if you could find one with that little miles. 2 yrs later It had the egr/oil cooler replaced. But I had been complaining about lost coolant the whole time. It never stranded me. My 1st trip complaining they said it was over filled so they flushed the system and remarked the degas bottle and replaced an injector. Go figure. I spent $100 in repairs over 120k miles. Not bad. Yall keep throwing around 6.0l problems as if there is no cure and never mention that a lot of it was techs throwing parts at it. A lot of things played part in the 6.0l troubles. 1 thing lead to another.
The 7.3l psd had a rough start also. But let's not tslk about that.
Headbolts in stock form don't just fsil unless there was something wrong w/ them or instslled wrong. Now if a turbo over boost or whatever and left the heads I don't consider that a headbolt problem. I agree the the tty head bolt
Wasn't a bright idea.
I can tell you of a lot of 5.4 and 6.8s that's had cam phasers, cams, rings, bearings, within 300k. Good engines as they are they are not bullet proof. Nor do they last forever. I like em and that's that. When it comes to work I want my psd. I've worked gassers all my life until 06. That doesn't mean I don't think a gas engine can't work as good. If I wanted a chevy or dodge I would have gotten it. No one forced me to buy Ford. I'm not going to defend my choice for buying a ford nor am I going to appoligize. I work my ford everyday I don't have time to keep w/ chevy's problem.
The only fix I did not do was the EGR delete because it is violation federal law. I tow and talk to people at RV parks and none of the 6.0 owners have trouble free truck, WHY?? I don't count the people that have had the truck less then a year or do not tow regular often.
I have seen 6.0 drive as Daile drivers and they seem to have less problems. The problem happen, just not as often.
Which engine did Ford sue International Harvester about????? What was the stated cause for the law suite? Why did Ford start development on their own engine???
COME ON the 6.0 as whole is terrible design. You can make it better but you can not fix the design flaws and stay legal.
7.3 is a great engine, WISH I had one.
6.4 Less problems then with the 6.0 when talking to people and Diesel Mechanics.
6.7 Seems to be great.
YES my v10 loves GAS... But it does the job and never leaves me on the side of the road.
The only fix I did not do was the EGR delete because it is violation federal law. I tow and talk to people at RV parks and none of the 6.0 owners have trouble free truck, WHY?? I don't count the people that have had the truck less then a year or do not tow regular often.
I have seen 6.0 drive as Daile drivers and they seem to have less problems. The problem happen, just not as often.
Which engine did Ford sue International Harvester about????? What was the stated cause for the law suite? Why did Ford start development on their own engine???
COME ON the 6.0 as whole is terrible design. You can make it better but you can not fix the design flaws and stay legal.
7.3 is a great engine, WISH I had one.
6.4 Less problems then with the 6.0 when talking to people and Diesel Mechanics.
6.7 Seems to be great.
YES my v10 loves GAS... But it does the job and never leaves me on the side of the road.
I never said the 7.3 wasn't a good engine. I've never owned or driven one. I don't know if I'd like it or not. What's the point. Who said the 7.3 was a bad engine?
You every time someone says that the 6.0 is junk and can't be fixed or gets sucky milage. Will leave you on the side of the ride every 30k miles and will get out pulled by a 5.4 or 6.8l you dang right I'm going to step in. Everytime sometime tells me I'm wrong about what I pay to maintain my truck I'm going to speak up as well.





