When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As a machinist, I'm constantly amazed by people who cannot tell which fraction is larger just because they have differing denominators. Am I the only one who paid attention in the 5th grade?
That was bad conversion of my standard joke comparing the metric and SAE systems.
Working in metric I know right away that 19 mm wrench is bigger than 17 mm and 2 mm drill bit is smaller than 3 mm.
In SAE comparing 41/64 to 5/8 is not so easy as well comparing 3/64 to 0.225".
USA was converting to metric about 30 years ago. What happened to this idea?
Man you have a very low opinion of americans. 41/64 > 5/8 by 1/64th. That is a lot easier to do in the head for most than figuring. Which is larger 3/64 or .225. Which we can do 2 different ways. Change the dec to fraction or fraction to dec. So what you have is 3÷64=.047 or .225/1000=1/4. 3/64<.225. This is elementry math.
What you don't understand is most of America isn't the spoiled rich that the rest of the world think we are. We are the hard working middle class. We are the mechics, carpenters, masons, drivers, etc. Etc. General math is our everyday.
What happened to us converting to metric? Cause its stupid. Almost nothing is even. Kilo 2.2lbs, liter 16.4?ozs. Mton 2200lbs. 1lb 16ozs. Pint 16ozs. Ton 2000lbs. All can be broke down evenly.
I converted to metric long ago: 5.56x45mm, 9x19mm, 7.62x39mm, 7.62x51mm, 7.92x57mm, firearms calibers always make mm's and decimal equivalents interesting.
Its stupid, thats funny! If you convert to it, then 1 kilo is 1 kilo, oh my god thats even! I liter is, oh my god 1 liter, so hard to work with. Ignorance is bliss though. And ignorance obviously goes in all directions in this thread.
Now that we are "off topic" I'll say what I think is stupid: Not making up their minds (manufacturers) so that we have both metric and S.A.E. on our vehicles, so that you never get the right size the first time unless you know the vehicle very very well.
Now I'll make an "on topic" comment.
For those arguing about HP vs. TQ
Bill's V10 has almost 50% more HP than my truck has, but if I had the same amount of HP, I would outtow him so bad....
Its stupid, thats funny! If you convert to it, then 1 kilo is 1 kilo, oh my god thats even! I liter is, oh my god 1 liter, so hard to work with. Ignorance is bliss though. And ignorance obviously goes in all directions in this thread.
Oh you are so smart. I'm not ignorant. I can convert anything you can throw at me. Every unit has a lower unit. Yes 1 liter is even but break it down. Let's say you need half a liter of something. That's 8.2ozs. What's even about that. Whsts the point in having 200lbs added to a ton. 1 kilo is after all 1 kilo. All I need is 1lb. Now I'm leaveing 1lb and 2ozs. Sae just makes more sense. But your to smart for me. Yea metric is stupid
Oh you are so smart. I'm not ignorant. I can convert anything you can throw at me. Every unit has a lower unit. Yes 1 liter is even but break it down. Let's say you need half a liter of something. That's 8.2ozs. What's even about that. Whsts the point in having 200lbs added to a ton. 1 kilo is after all 1 kilo. All I need is 1lb. Now I'm leaveing 1lb and 2ozs. Sae just makes more sense. But your to smart for me. Yea metric is stupid
What you're saying isn't right and isn't the way you do it. If you have a litre and need half a litre, you don't convert to SAE and use 8.2 oz you just use 500 millilitres for half a litre.
You are jumping back and forth between units. If you're using metric stay in metric.
Man you have a very low opinion of americans. 41/64 > 5/8 by 1/64th. That is a lot easier to do in the head for most than figuring. Which is larger 3/64 or .225. Which we can do 2 different ways. Change the dec to fraction or fraction to dec. So what you have is 3÷64=.047 or .225/1000=1/4. 3/64<.225. This is elementry math.
What you don't understand is most of America isn't the spoiled rich that the rest of the world think we are. We are the hard working middle class. We are the mechics, carpenters, masons, drivers, etc. Etc. General math is our everyday.
What happened to us converting to metric? Cause its stupid. Almost nothing is even. Kilo 2.2lbs, liter 16.4?ozs. Mton 2200lbs. 1lb 16ozs. Pint 16ozs. Ton 2000lbs. All can be broke down evenly.
Wow, I'm beginning to wonder if there is anything you actually understand. The purpose of metric is not to serve as a conversion for S.A.E., it is a measurement system all to itself. Since everything is based on a factor of 10, your complaint about "breaking it down " will probably provide forum entertainment for another day or 2.
BTW, give Mozilla Firefox a try, it has a built-in spelling checker.
Wow, I'm beginning to wonder if there is anything you actually understand. The purpose of metric is not to serve as a conversion for S.A.E., it is a measurement system all to itself. Since everything is based on a factor of 10, your complaint about "breaking it down " will probably provide forum entertainment for another day or 2.
BTW, give Mozilla Firefox a try, it has a built-in spelling checker.
I understand that horsepower is the rate energy inputs/outputs into a system. You have to have tq and rpm or some liner movement before you can have horsepower. So to measure it you calculate. Now if your ask what you use to measure horsepower than that different but not what you asked. I answered what you asked.
Kajtek was making suggestions of converting back and forth between sae and metric. My answer is simply its stupid cause we american have a system and for us to us metric would be a mixing of the 2. Instead of going and getting a gal of gas you'd be getting 3.8ls. If tried using liters. The 3 liter around here anyway didn't do to good. I understand that metric system isn't using ozs to make its liters. I was saying just what I mean. To convert you would have to re teach a whole country how to measure stuff. How to rethink. Seems much easier to just know how to convert. Which I can show you i know how to do.
Oh my BlackBerry has a spell check. Sometimes I forget to check to make sure its still checking. I can't spell worth a flip. You replied so you understood me and that's all I care about.
My truck doesn't cut of at 3600 rpm. I've hit 4k-4200 several times.
No one I know gets less than 15 and the guys that get 15-16mpg drive like they are running to the goal line all day long.
I just looked up the fuel cutoff again and I found several places that said 4,200 and a few that said 3,600, so I will go with the 4,200 you say. However, the 6.0 makes peak hp of 325 at 3,000 rpm, so we know that it doesn't make more than 325 hp at 4,200 rpm. Doing the hp equation in reverse to get tq, it shows that even if the 6.0 makes 325 hp at 4,200 rpm(which it doesn't) it would only have a tq rating of (325 hp x 5,252/4,200 rpm)=406 tq. That is less tq and hp than the 6.8 has at 4,200 rpm by quite a bit, so in that comparison you are actually doing worse in the same gear at the same rpm than the 6.8(and more than likely a 3v 5.4). Running a diesel past peak hp is pointless because the power drop off is a whole lot worse than it is in a gasser.
My neighbor gets 9-10 mpg's out of his 6.0 and all of the company trucks we had on our job sites got less than 15 mpg's. My cousin got about 18 mpg's out of his, which is the best I have seen personally with my own eyes, but I would believe someone if they said they got in the 20 range with theirs.
I just looked up the fuel cutoff again and I found several places that said 4,200 and a few that said 3,600, so I will go with the 4,200 you say. However, the 6.0 makes peak hp of 325 at 3,000 rpm, so we know that it doesn't make more than 325 hp at 4,200 rpm. Doing the hp equation in reverse to get tq, it shows that even if the 6.0 makes 325 hp at 4,200 rpm(which it doesn't) it would only have a tq rating of (325 hp x 5,252/4,200 rpm)=406 tq. That is less tq and hp than the 6.8 has at 4,200 rpm by quite a bit, so in that comparison you are actually doing worse in the same gear at the same rpm than the 6.8(and more than likely a 3v 5.4). Running a diesel past peak hp is pointless because the power drop off is a whole lot worse than it is in a gasser.
My neighbor gets 9-10 mpg's out of his 6.0 and all of the company trucks we had on our job sites got less than 15 mpg's. My cousin got about 18 mpg's out of his, which is the best I have seen personally with my own eyes, but I would believe someone if they said they got in the 20 range with theirs.
Now if you remember I've always said I could rev higher. I just don't benifit from it. I've seen a few dynos of the 6.0 and the tq was somewhere aound 500. I believe that will have to be at the fly wheel. A diesels tq does not drop like a gasser. What's helping the 6.8 and 5.4 is its peak power is at the peak rpm. So there's no real drop off but its a steep climb to the point. I'm sorry if I implied I run at 4k rpm. I have just hit those rpms at times. I don't often cause I have no gain and actually loss fuel.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.