When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ok, dyno's DO NOT measure horsepower, let's try this...
On modern day dynamometers horsepower is a calculated value. It's important to remember the dyno measures torque and rpm and then from these calculates horsepower. On the dyno it takes more water flow to the water brake to increase the load on the engine being tested. As the test engine's torque rises more water flow is needed. As the test engine's torque drops less water flow is needed. The dyno's water brake does not respond to Horsepower. Major adjustments to water flow are needed as an engine crosses its torque peak but none are needed as it crosses its horsepower peak. In other words the water flow to the brake during a dyno test follows the engines torque curve and not its horsepower curve. Torque is what twists the tire, prop, or pump. Horsepower helps us understand an amount or quantity of torque. (Torque + time and distance)
finally someone who knows what there talking about. besides the fact that this argument was like 80 or 90 pages ago, the simple fact is that anything that gives you a read out of HP measures torque and caculates it into hp.
HP = TORQUE X RPM / 5252 (a constant)
so if your truck makes 500 ft/lbs of torque at 3000 rpm the your truck makes 286 hp. that simple.
Gassers don't tend to melt pistons like Diesels do, but either way, you're right. An engine will not last long screaming away at those speeds, but it WILL pull the load - until it blows up that is.
So is what you're saying is that a diesel will last longer pulling a heavy load and therefore is a better engine? That's what I read there.
ok, dyno's DO NOT measure horsepower, let's try this...
On modern day dynamometers horsepower is a calculated value. It's important to remember the dyno measures torque and rpm and then from these calculates horsepower. On the dyno it takes more water flow to the water brake to increase the load on the engine being tested. As the test engine's torque rises more water flow is needed. As the test engine's torque drops less water flow is needed. The dyno's water brake does not respond to Horsepower. Major adjustments to water flow are needed as an engine crosses its torque peak but none are needed as it crosses its horsepower peak. In other words the water flow to the brake during a dyno test follows the engines torque curve and not its horsepower curve. Torque is what twists the tire, prop, or pump. Horsepower helps us understand an amount or quantity of torque. (Torque + time and distance)
That's what I was always taught -- Like you said, you measure torque and calculate horsepower.
This debate about dyno's makes me think of the new ratings for small engines. New Briggs and Stratton engines are rated according to torque now. Probably a new manditory standard because the old horsepower ratings were misleading or easily manipulated and someone probably sued.
Why can't you people get it?
Dynos measure HP.
Dynojet, Mustang, etc, etc-they all measure HP.
If they measured torque and calculated HP,then you would get a torque curve plot on the screen/printout after the run if there was no engine RPM input.
Go put any vehicle you want on a dyno-anything. Strap it down and do a pull without an engine RPM input. No matter what you do,you CANNOT get a torque curve or torque values for that pull-you will get HP ONLY becuase that's what the dyno is measuring. I've spent countless hours on the dyno with my own car, and helping setup/strapdown on dyno tuning weekend sessions. Diesel, Gas-we've done them all.
JL
Probably a new manditory standard because the old horsepower ratings were misleading or easily manipulated and someone probably sued.
This was done because small equipment engines were rated at their max hp rpm,and in most applications,these engines never see that RPM.
Here's an example.... Subaru Robin
Robin/Subaru EX21 engine.
This is a popular engine used on small generators.
It's makes 7hp@4000rpms.
On a generator application, it MUST turn 3600rpms in order to get the right frequency and voltage output from the generator head. At that RPM,it's only making approx 5.5hp. Before the new standards,the small engine manufacturers were selling these engines as 7hp,when they were actually only a 5.5hp engine in that application. That would be like Ford selling an engine advertised at 400hp and then limiting it to 325 via RPM or some other method.
JL
This was done because small equipment engines were rated at their max hp rpm,and in most applications,these engines never see that RPM.
Here's an example.... Subaru Robin
Robin/Subaru EX21 engine.
This is a popular engine used on small generators.
It's makes 7hp@4000rpms.
On a generator application, it MUST turn 3600rpms in order to get the right frequency and voltage output from the generator head. At that RPM,it's only making approx 5.5hp. Before the new standards,the small engine manufacturers were selling these engines as 7hp,when they were actually only a 5.5hp engine in that application. That would be like Ford selling an engine advertised at 400hp and then limiting it to 325 via RPM or some other method.
JL
I'm not going to claim to know anything about Dyno's, but I do know how to google. This discussion has aroused my curiosity on the subject so I did some poking around. Not that I've spent a lot of time searching, but I have yet to find a single source to support your thesis, other than message forums. I did find a couple of dyno software advertisements that say their stuff can "measure" HP and torque but it doesn't say which one is derived by the other.
As far as I can tell in my whole 10 minutes of searching is that dyno's measure torque. But in the end, does it really matter what it measures as long as the output is accurate?
I'm not going to claim to know anything about Dyno's, but I do know how to google. This discussion has aroused my curiosity on the subject so I did some poking around. Not that I've spent a lot of time searching, but I have yet to find a single source to support your thesis, other than message forums. I did find a couple of dyno software advertisements that say their stuff can "measure" HP and torque but it doesn't say which one is derived by the other.
As far as I can tell in my whole 10 minutes of searching is that dyno's measure torque. But in the end, does it really matter what it measures as long as the output is accurate?
It's very simple. With NO RPM INPUT-you GET NO TORQUE GRAPH.
HP is measured, torque is calculated based on engine RPM and the HP curve.
Call Dynojet and ask them.
Call Mustang Dyno and ask them.
JL
So JL, if you have no rpm input to the dyno, how do you get a hp chart? What data is being presented on the X axis? Does it not have HP on the Y axis and rpm on the X axis?
As far as I can tell, when you set up a dyno, you tell it the transmission gear ratio, diff ratio, and tire diameter, and have an engine rpm input. So if you take away the rpm input, the dyno can derive it based on how fast the wheels turning. So where am I going wrong?
So JL, if you have no rpm input to the dyno, how do you get a hp chart? What data is being presented on the X axis? Does it not have HP on the Y axis and rpm on the X axis?
As far as I can tell, when you set up a dyno, you tell it the transmission gear ratio, diff ratio, and tire diameter, and have an engine rpm input. So if you take away the rpm input, the dyno can derive it based on how fast the wheels turning. So where am I going wrong?
You tell the dyno NONE of that information. The only thing it knows is work and time. It knows vehicle speed based on the roller diameter that is constant. With no RPM input-the dyno sheet will have a HP curve based on MPH or time,but it still WILL NOT have a torque curve.
A mustang dyno has an eddy-current load cell that that varies loading on the drum based on the input of the vehicle's specifics, and it only wants to know the hp required to keep that vehicle in motion at 50mph and the vehicle's weight. There's a reference manual with the Mustang dyno that has this information in it for various vehicle types. It only needs to know this so it can setup the eddy-current load cell properly for the vehicle tested.
JL
Now that makes sense to me. If the dyno knows what is power is present at the ground, it needs the engine rpm to get around the fact that it doesn't know the gear ratio's and calculates what torque should be at the flywheel. However, that still doesn't mean that it measures hp. It sounds to me like it measures force at the wheels but since hp doesn't change throughout the drivetrain, it can calculate the hp without engine rpm, because it knows wheel rpm. Then it has to take out the increases in tractive force due to the gearing to come up with a torque value at the flywheel, which means it has to know engine rpm. That explanation is in accordance with everything else I have read about dyno's and also explains why you get a hp curve without an engine rpm input despite the fact that the dyno is measuring torque at the wheels.
To make things worse, don't dynos have a fixed-weight drum? Which doesn't directly correlate to vehicle weight, drag, etc?
Yes, Dynojets have a fixed weight drum. Mustang dynos have a fixed weight drum, but also have the variable eddy current load cell that works in conjunction with the drum's weight to get an accurate real-world load. Dynojets typically yield a higher RWHP value than a Mustang dyno on the same vehicle, but in my experience, Dynojets are able to repeat results more accurately than a Mustang dyno can.
So, basically-if you're doing back to back tests of a product, use a Dynojet for the most accurate results. If you're doing a dyno tune of a vehicle-use a Mustang dyno.
JL
To make things worse, don't dynos have a fixed-weight drum? Which doesn't directly correlate to vehicle weight, drag, etc?
Right! These things have nothing to do with engine power or torque output! A dyno isn't supposed to tell you how well an engine does it's job, simply the output of an engine minus driveline losses.
The only thing that would vary here between V10 and PSD would be dry weight, as I think PSD trucks are on average around 500 lbs more than the gas trucks.
Right! These things have nothing to do with engine power or torque output! A dyno isn't supposed to tell you how well an engine does it's job, simply the output of an engine minus driveline losses.
This is exactly why nobody should be "setting up" a dyno just for a diesel to make pulls. This is known as "tuning the dyno" to make a shop/tuner look good, or to make the customer feel good by inflating/skewing the numbers.
JL