Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2011 | 10:00 PM
  #11191  
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
This thread is hilarious!
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #11192  
PorchFarms's Avatar
PorchFarms
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: West TN
yep, one side argues torque means more and the other side says hp. funny thing is they both are important. if a truck has 1000 hp but 100 ft lbs of torque then it can't get a heavy load moving, or if it has 100 hp and 1000 ft lbs of torque it will move it but not very fast. majority of my towing is heavy loads on back roads so speed is not an issue. i need moving power so i pull with my diesel. when you have a trailer maxed out in rough ground you will want all the torque you can get. try to pull 30000 pounds over cotton rows in a v 10 and then a diesel and tell me which is better.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2011 | 11:20 PM
  #11193  
Plugman's Avatar
Plugman
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Originally Posted by Snowseeker
This thread is hilarious!
This.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 01:05 AM
  #11194  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by David N.
The numbers you list are peak numbers. That's what the engines would make at that rpm at wide open throttle. Neither would be at WOT, though, so neither would be the maximum torque they could at that rpm. Instead, both are making some percentage--different for each engine--of the torque they are capable of.

If the trucks are identical with respect to truck/trailer weight and size, and are going the same speed on the same terrain, the the forces opposing each trucks motion have to be the same. If your engine was putting out more force than his, then one of you would be making more or less than enough power to equal the load you see. Either you would be speeding up, or he would be slowing down.
So your saying my truck will only make 570 ftlbs of tq @ 2200 rpms if its at WOT. Dude is 2200 rpm not 2200 rpm at any fuel load? What is your basis other than what you've said. So really if what you said is right the transmission, rearend, tiresize engine specs has nothing to do w/ anything.
And no I wasn't useing peak numbers. If you read I only used 80% of the peak. Aight let's use 50% of each engines peak. You still have the same situation more in multiplied by the same numbers will have more output.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 05:14 AM
  #11195  
bucci's Avatar
bucci
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 843
Likes: 6
From: Jessup, PA
I have a question.

If I'm cruising at 2000 rpm at 60 mph on flat ground and I come to a steeper grade. I apply more throtte to maintain 2000 rpm and 60 mph and the truck remains in the same gear. It does not downshift. Is the truck putting the same power to the ground in both situations?
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 06:46 AM
  #11196  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by bucci
I have a question.

If I'm cruising at 2000 rpm at 60 mph on flat ground and I come to a steeper grade. I apply more throtte to maintain 2000 rpm and 60 mph and the truck remains in the same gear. It does not downshift. Is the truck putting the same power to the ground in both situations?
Not unless the engine is operating under full load before coming to a hill to maintain 60 MPH.

If your engine isn't under full load it's not putting out it's full rated torque or horsepower at that given RPM. As you press the accelerator pedal down the engine produces more power to give you what you are demanding though the pedal. Engine power would come up to produce the maximum torque and horsepower available in that RPM.

If you're already at full engine load before coming to the hill, pressing the pedal to the floor will do nothing, as the engine is already giving you everything it has at that RPM. You would either have to downshift to maintain the same speed or loose speed in the same gear.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 07:07 AM
  #11197  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by exiled
So your saying my truck will only make 570 ftlbs of tq @ 2200 rpms if its at WOT. Dude is 2200 rpm not 2200 rpm at any fuel load? What is your basis other than what you've said.
You just don't get it.
Yes, what he said was exactly that. Your engine WILL NOT output the max "rated" HP/TQ at any RPM through the range unless it's at WOT.
Spend some time with various vehicles on chassis dynos and you'll see and understand exactly what he's saying.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 08:17 AM
  #11198  
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
When I push on the go peddle in my 7.3 I can move houses and it whistles while doing it. V10's just suck gas and whine.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 12, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #11199  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by CampSpringsJohn
As for those afraid of the 6.4, check out this thread.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...g-the-dpf.html
Let me get this straight:

10MPG in an unloaded F450 that weighs 10,000 lbs, completely stock. (Now, I understand that has something to do with the gearing in it, it's probably running 4.88's)

Removing stock emissions equipment, and installing a tuner, he got up to 14. With 2500lbs, he's at 13.5. That's a total of 12,500lbs, INCLUDING THE TRUCK.

And, he needed a high pressure fuel pump at around 90,000 miles, that required the cab to come off?

On top of all that, he runs the risk of getting stopped by the DOT and fined because he removed the DPF?

What's not to love?
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 09:23 AM
  #11200  
Super08's Avatar
Super08
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Art you got about the same info that I got from it. It is sounding like HPFP's are becoming a problem on the 6.4. They are after changing many of them from what I have heard and also seen on the forums. This is also part of the recall to reflash the cpu. They want to try and catch it sooner. Once you are outside of warranty it is something to the tune of 7k or so to change one. My best friend works for a contract shop that specializes in Fords. He also tells me they have changed a load of DPF's. They are a few thousand bucks as well. When the truck is used in the oilfield environment where it is mostly stop and go will high idle times in the field due to the cold winters it just kills the DPF's. These are all part of my decision to go back to gas.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 09:29 AM
  #11201  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
You just don't get it.
Yes, what he said was exactly that. Your engine WILL NOT output the max "rated" HP/TQ at any RPM through the range unless it's at WOT.
Spend some time with various vehicles on chassis dynos and you'll see and understand exactly what he's saying.
JL
Your right I just don't get it. So can please use a picture to explain it for me. Like useing some kind of math? I'm not arguing I want understand this. I guess I'm the only one in this thread trying to learn something. Yall keep saying your not making peak tq unless your at WOT. Aight I left that alone. I hope everyone here agreed both engines make different numbers at peak. Aight well your goimg to make a % of that. If you didn't how it continue to move. The same percent of different numbers is going to be different.
Why do you have to be at WOT reach advertised numbers? I can't get my head around this. I cant spell what I'm trying to say and its mot even close. What is the difference of 2200 rpm at 10 mpg or 18 mpg. What is the reasoning that the throttle haveing to be maxed to get peak numbers?
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 09:44 AM
  #11202  
Super08's Avatar
Super08
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
The torque curve for any given engine is shown at WOT. If a given engine is producing say 80% of peak torque at say 2200 rpm it has to be at WOT to attain this level of Torque. If the throttle is at any level below WOT then the power being produced by the engine will be less. As explained above if you are driving along at 60 mph and say are only using 2/3rds throttle you are not developing full torque as shown on the chart for that rpm. If you now put the pedal to the floor it will develop the max torque for that given rpm. If the load against the engine is less than the torque now being developed it will accelerate until you back off or the increased load against the engine becomes balanced again with the amount of torqued being developed. Torque is really the true measure of an engines power. HP is really only a representation of torque over rpm. It is calculated through an equation from the measured torque. That is why they are always equal the 5252 rpm as that figure is used in the equation to show HP.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #11203  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
the main reason the 6.8 isnt the most impressive gasser released by ford, is because of its low compression. they werent makin a high performance motor, rather somethin that would run on 87 and have the the torque at a low enough rpm that it could be used in a truck. its still around cuz of the horrible reputation of the 7.3's successors. if it were 10.5-11:1, or had a supercharger, it would be much more impressive (although i still wouldnt be impressed).
It was never meant to be like the Dodge SRT10 pickup and impress you by being able to burn rubber in every gear. Its a work horse thats long lasting, has cheap up keep and does everything the PSD can at a much lower cost.
Why would fleet owners want to buy a 11:1 CR or Forced induction V10?
What would it take to impress you?

Originally Posted by '89F2urd
less wear than the 3000rpm of the gas motor. . .
Prove it. You all say that but nobody will show proof to back up their claim.

Originally Posted by exiled
I don't know what the top speed of a v10 is and if 3k rpms is in side of that.
All the V10 and PSD trucks are limited to 95-105 MPH from the factory, so top speed would be the same.


Originally Posted by exiled
Why do you think a psd will have a problem holding 3k rpms?
For the same reason some Powerstroke guys seem to think the V10 can't run 5,000 RPMs.




Originally Posted by Krewat
Let me get this straight:

10MPG in an unloaded F450 that weighs 10,000 lbs, completely stock. (Now, I understand that has something to do with the gearing in it, it's probably running 4.88's)

Removing stock emissions equipment, and installing a tuner, he got up to 14. With 2500lbs, he's at 13.5. That's a total of 12,500lbs, INCLUDING THE TRUCK.

And, he needed a high pressure fuel pump at around 90,000 miles, that required the cab to come off?

On top of all that, he runs the risk of getting stopped by the DOT and fined because he removed the DPF?

What's not to love?
Best part of that thread.
Originally Posted by sdetweil
15 seems very optimistic.. 8-10 empty at 10,000lbs dry weight seems about expected..
No fuel savings over the V10, it costs more to keep it running and it cost $8,000 more to buy.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 10:30 AM
  #11204  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
Originally Posted by bill11012
It was never meant to be like the Dodge SRT10 pickup and impress you by being able to burn rubber in every gear. Its a work horse thats long lasting, has cheap up keep and does everything the PSD can at a much lower cost.
Why would fleet owners want to buy a 11:1 CR or Forced induction V10?
What would it take to impress you?

you just dont get what i was sayin, twice. i was actually defending against his (perhaps attack) on the 6.8 not being "as impressive". and i was STATING that it wasnt meant to be "impressive" but rather purpose built for a light duty truck. . .which, by nature, makes the power numbers "not so impressive" to an untrained eye. so, you can stop on this, cuz i was defending your motor.


Prove it. You all say that but nobody will show proof to back up their claim.

prove what? diesels last longer than gassers. period. diesel is a lubricant, gasoline cleans parts. there is an amount of cylinder wash (albeit slight) during/after each injection cycle. gasoline is harder on rings/cylinder walls/bearings than diesel is. the higher the rpm, the more damage is done. your v10 is not defiant of physics. your motor wont reach 1/2 the miles mine will, and mine's had double the power to the ground that yours does (and has for 200k of its 235000 mile life). i drag race it, tow with it, and i rip around burnin trucks like yours on the street, constantly (its my DD). all averaging 18mpg i might add (still dont understand why you think a v10 is "cheaper" when it gets awful mileage). that enough proof? theres the physics, and then there are countless examples to cite, you just dont like to recognize/accept them for some reason.

All the V10 and PSD trucks are limited to 95-105 MPH from the factory, so top speed would be the same.


No fuel savings over the V10, it costs more to keep it running and it cost $8,000 more to buy.

i dunno whether youre in denial, delerious, or both. . .but a huge displacement, low compression, low injection pressure, spark ignition gasser is not getting over 10mpg, but prob more like 6-8 (vs the other guys claimed 14[i think it was 14]) in a 10,000 pound truck with the aerodynamic equivalent of pushin a piece of plywood face-first through the air (again, the 6.8l v10 is not defiant of physics). ALSO, as i said earlier, the new multi-injection/cycle common rails are the most efficient diesel motors to date (after deletes). . . now, WHAT I DO UNDERSTAND (and fully agree with you) is that an emission-equipped diesel (especially the v8's) dont get high enough mileage to justify the extra 8,000 dollar price tag of ANY and ALL makes of vehicles they come in. which is why i would never buy one unless its deleted, or had low enough miles where i felt comfortable deleting it. AND there are ways to get around the DOT (stealth deletes). but, i dont have to worry about that for years to come since ill drive mine until the day my venerable compression ignition motor just wont run anymore.
responses red
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #11205  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
Originally Posted by exiled
Your right I just don't get it. So can please use a picture to explain it for me. Like useing some kind of math? I'm not arguing I want understand this. I guess I'm the only one in this thread trying to learn something. Yall keep saying your not making peak tq unless your at WOT. Aight I left that alone. I hope everyone here agreed both engines make different numbers at peak. Aight well your goimg to make a % of that. If you didn't how it continue to move. The same percent of different numbers is going to be different.
Why do you have to be at WOT reach advertised numbers? I can't get my head around this. I cant spell what I'm trying to say and its mot even close. What is the difference of 2200 rpm at 10 mpg or 18 mpg. What is the reasoning that the throttle haveing to be maxed to get peak numbers?

the explanation has been given a couple times that ive seen, but ill try to put it in different terms.

more fuel + more air = more power, right? for instance, when you chipped your 7.3 (assuming you have) it added more fuel, right? which in turn, increased your boost (air available), and made your truck faster, right?

well, in essence, this is exactly what the skinny pedal does. it increases your fuel, boost, power. its basically an "adjustable power regulator". . .you adjust the amount of amount of fuel and boost(which is power) that you want/need at at any given time. when you are towing on flat ground, and reach a hill, what do you have to do? ya gotta push that skinny pedal to demand more fuel, which in turn creates more boost, which in turn propels you harder (acceleration) or keeps your load moving up the hill the same speed (you basically demanded more of the motors potential power).

another way to think about it. youre cruisin empty on a flat road goin a constant speed, and you encounter a nice straight away. you decide to get in it and rip through a gear or two. . .you obviously didnt unleash full power until you put the throttle to the floor, right? otherwise, at full fuel/boost(power) it would be impossible for you to drive at a constant speed. you were basically using a small percentage of the total power available to keep you moving, then unleashed the full potential (basically what it reads on an accurate dyno) when you demanded that the max amount of fuel available gets injected into the motor. hence giving you the beloved feel of being pushed into your seat. so, all the above bein said, you should understand that "advertised" power numbers, or power numbers you see on a dyno chart, are basically telling you what is the power potential for a motor. . .realistically, a motor will only see those power numbers for a fraction of its life. when you drive around in normal conditions from point a to point b, you only unleash those numbers when you decide its time to let the pedal kiss the floor mat.

as far as the "2200 at 10 mpg vs 2200 at 18mpg" - - - when you mash the pedal demanding more fuel, your mileage obviously decreases. just cuz youre at a particular rpm doesnt mean you will get a particular mpg. . .there are more variables than that. the more power you wanna feel at a particular rpm, the harder you push the pedal, and in turn the more fuel you are burning. cuz more fuel + air = more power, at any rpm.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE