When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You say anything is BS if it does not talk great of the the V10
Theres a 2V in the V10 forum that ran on the dyno and made 255 RWHP last week end.
That mag was either making up numbers or the V10 was not running right.It was an unfair test.
Those numbers are way off. The 390HP 5.7 Hemi in the new Ram 1500s dynos at over 300RWHP. There is no way a 362HP V10 is going to dyno at 223RWHP, that a loss of 139HP.
The general rule of thumb is 10-15% power train loss, the V10 in that test has a 39% power loss. That kind of loss just isn't possible. Three things could have happened here. 1. The V10 had a problem and wasn't making full power, 2. They lied and tested an older 2v V10, or 3. They lied and didn't test a V10 at all. I've also never heard of a stock 6.4 with the DPF still attached getting anywhere near that mileage either. I have a friend with a 6.4, and whenever he tows a trailer he usually gets around 7-9 MPG, around 13-14 highway unloaded. Add that to the fact the magazine is Diesel Power, I'm sure they are going to obscure the facts as much as possible to make the diesel seem better.
@ ChargersFan: Not sure where your getting bluebook prices from, but I just configured two identical 2008 trucks with 75,000 miles on kbb.org using their suggested retail value option. The truck was a Crew Cab F-350 Lariat 6 ft bed. The 6.4 booked for 34k, the V10 28k. Only $6000 difference. The second truck was CC F-350 Harley Davidson, 8ft bed. The V10 booked at 35k, the 6.4 at 37k. Just $2000 difference. For fun, I just did a basic work truck, 08 F-350 regular cab XL, the 6.4 books at 27k, the V10 at 21k. $6000 difference again.
Mike from 5 star bought a new 6.2L 2011 gas engine and its rated at 385hp and he dyno it and it made 250 rwhp. So I'm going off of that. And he posted the dyno graph so a 362 hp v-10 will probably make 230 or so to the wheels. Plus I don't how these 6.4L guys are driving and only get 13-14 mpg on the hwy unloaded. Cause I'm driving 65-70 mph and I'm get 18 to 19 mpg on the hwy unloaded. Maybe some people need to learn how to drive all over again.
I would really like to take a look at mike's dyno graph if you could provide a link or post it. If that is all true the v10's has no hp advantage and is a joke for torque compared to a diesel.
I would really like to take a look at mike's dyno graph if you could provide a link or post it. If that is all true the v10's has no hp advantage and is a joke for torque compared to a diesel.
The 3V made 250 on Mikes dyno, which reads low from what I have seen.
A 2V makes that much.
I want to see dyno graphs where a stock 2v v-10 that made what 310 hp make 250 at the wheels. Hell I want to see a stock 3v v-10 make 250 at the wheels.
I could be wrong, but isn't there differences in the transmission that accounts for why the V10 puts less horsepower to the ground than the PSD? In that the PSD tranny is more efficient.
I could be wrong, but isn't there differences in the transmission that accounts for why the V10 puts less horsepower to the ground than the PSD? In that the PSD tranny is more efficient.
The newer v-10s have the same tranny as the 6.0 and 6.4 psd. Torqueshift 5 spd. Now they might be geared differently.
Second I know my truck could beat that v10's hp like taking a walk in the park. And lets not even look at the torque numbers for the v10's sake.
V10 truck:
223hp @ 4032 RPM at the rear wheels
316tq @ 3458 RPM at the rear wheels