When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You are correct.
And actually a diesel is less polluting than a gas engine. By a wide margin.
Pretty near 0% hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide is produced during the combustion process.
Gas engines have required catalytic converters since the mid '70's and diesel engines have not until much later and those are simply particulate traps, not catalytic converters.
Are you saying diesels pollute less than gasoline vehicles labeled with California's Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle ("ULEV") and Super Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle ("SULEV") standards?
Are you saying diesels pollute less than gasoline vehicles labeled with California's Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle ("ULEV") and Super Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle ("SULEV") standards?
Remove all the catalytic converters, EVAP systems, and yes they fill the atmosphere with carbon monoxide (half burned fuel) and hydrocarbons (unburned fuel).
Diesels don't need any of that stuff. You could live in the exhaust of a diesel engine. At idle the fuel air ratio is around 100/1. Plenty of oxygen left over to survive on and the amount of CO is just a trace.
You would smell like a locomotive, and I don't recommend that you try it, but you would be alive.
In a gas engine exhaust all but .5% of the oxygen is left over, along with about .%5-1% CO, 125PPM HC. Without the catalyst there to clean up the mess that would be released to the environment.
That's just the exhaust stream, you also have to make sure that the volitile gasoline doesn't vent HC to the atmosphere, so you have to have the EVAP system on the fuel storage.
Diesel is oil and won't evaporate like gasoline does.
.
I saw a TV show a while back where they were using a diesel powered personel transport in an underground mine.
Definately not a place where you want to have a bunch of CO and HC gathering.
With the diesel there is no chance of a volitile fuel escaping and filling the mine with explosive gasses.
And cleaning up the exhaust is easy, they just used a particulate trap for the soot.
Oops, sorry. I guess I was in 'serious mode' when I read it and went in the wrong direction.
Not ill-conceived, just ill-received. Funny. Ever been on a horse when it has bad gas? It's some kind of torture, I tell ya.
It's all good. Not much of a horse rider myself but when they are a major part of transportation you tend to have to deal with horse exhaust (also called road apples) enough to get an idea of what that smell must be like.
Originally Posted by bucci
Sometimes jokes get missed or misunderstood. That's because everyone is cocked and loaded just waiting to fire back especially if the comment is made by someone having the opposing engine.
I'm pretty neutral on the whole V10 vs PSD. I like my V10 but have nothing against the 7.3, 6.0 or 6.4. I will probably always buy a V10 because it does what I need it to do but I don't begrudge anyone buying a PSD.
I'm pretty neutral on the whole V10 vs PSD. I like my V10 but have nothing against the 7.3, 6.0 or 6.4. I will probably always buy a V10 because it does what I need it to do but I don't begrudge anyone buying a PSD.
I feel the same way, in reverse.
I wouldn't hesitate to purchase a V-10 if the right opportunity presented itself.
You are correct.
And actually a diesel is less polluting than a gas engine. By a wide margin.
Pretty near 0% hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide is produced during the combustion process.
Gas engines have required catalytic converters since the mid '70's and diesel engines have not until much later and those are simply particulate traps, not catalytic converters.
Wrong. They are catalytic converters. Diesels don't emit very much hydrocarbons, but still do emit CO, Oxides of Nitrogen (very nasty stuff) and Soot. You use catalytic converters to clean up the CO and NOx, some diesels have had a cat since the early 90s. You use a DPF (diesel particulate filter) to clean up the soot. DPFs were not required here until 2007.
we all know that an oil burner is better than a gasser, right?
Bill has finally seen the light!! Congrats Bill. Believe me when I tell you that the women flocking to your new diesel will become a burden. It is just something that we learn to live with. May peace be with you.
Disclaimer: A slight modification may have been accomplished to achieve desired results.
Bill has finally seen the light!! Congrats Bill. Believe me when I tell you that the women flocking to your new diesel will become a burden. It is just something that we learn to live with. May peace be with you.
Disclaimer: A slight modification may have been accomplished to achieve desired results.
haha, nice try, you edited what I said.
I said that a gasser puts out more harmful gases from the exhaust, and that a diesel is better in that one area.
haha, nice try, you edited what I said.
I said that a gasser puts out more harmful gases from the exhaust, and that a diesel is better in that one area.
I don't know, it looks like he is right in your quote.
Originally Posted by bill11012
Why are we arguing about smog?
we all know that an oil burner is better than a gasser, right?
It's ok to change teams in the middle. We will take you.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.