Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #1681  
Rush117's Avatar
Rush117
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
Originally Posted by Ballswedge
I love it when people spout thier uneducated crap like its the "word of god" just because thier dealer coaxed them into buying the more expensive truck.

The "one off" magazine article you speak of is exactly that, one off. No other magazine has done this comparison yet and noone really cares to because everyone including your f-ing grandmother owns a PSD turd now.
Yopu make it sound like a longer pull would have yielded different results, the fact of the matter is that the V10 would have passed the PSD had the course been longer. Can you understand that? The 4.30 gear is the preferred gear of the V10 as it makes is power higher in the rpm than the PSD. A 4.30 geared V10 is more comparable to a 3.73 geared PSD.

BC is flatlands compared to the Rockies. I've pulled through there many times and seen many a PSD stranded on the side of the road. Want to get "humbled" try Colorado, or even Tennessee interstates.

Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
To me, that is what is comes down to. I have pulled the same load with both and it is night and day. You can bash all you want but each of you know that if you could afford a PSD or other diesel, and use it to tow,. you would have purchase one. There you go, I said it. Bash all you want. I really dont care. For the morons to say that thie v10 will outpull and outlast and is an overall better motor than a Cat C9 due to the v10 having higher HP, you a F'ing morons. Ban me if you want, I don't care. Below are numbers.

I can't wait for BillTroll to tell me that the v10 is a better pulling motor.

Cat C9
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="evenrow" width="30%">Horsepower</td> <td class="evenrow" width="70%">335 to 350 @ 2200 rpm</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="oddrow" width="30%">Torque</td> <td class="oddrow" width="70%">1150-1250 lb-ft @ 1400 rpm</td></tr></tbody></table>
V10
2007 - Max HP - 362 @ 4750 rpm
2007 - Max Torque - 457 @ 3250 rpm
It's a shame that this entertaining thread has to end like this.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #1682  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by phillips91
first off man, calm it down a little. we are all just having a good natured debate. no need to get personal with people or question their intellect.

second of all, comparing a 4.30 geared v10 to a 3.73 geared psd is not comparable. just because thats the preferred gear doesnt mean its evenly matched. yes, the v10 makes its power at higher rpms and the psd makes it power at lower rpms, so giving them those gearing combos will keep the respective engine in its power band at cruising rpms. but thats where the "even-ness" of the comparison ends. not only will the v10 be in its power band, but it will also have a much better final drive ratio.

if you want a fair engine vs engine comparison then compare them with the same gearing, in the same tranny gear, and at their preferred rpm. for example, both trucks will be in 4th gear, have 3.73(or 4.10 or whatever) rear ends, and the psd will be at 2k rpm and the v10 will be at 4k rpm, then tell me which one pulls better. they will be at different speeds, but the comparison is more even that way and the results come from engine power and not gearing.
but that is not a fair test, it hands it to the V10.
to be a fair test, both need to be going the same speed, at the best RPM for both, with the gearing to have them both running the best they can.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #1683  
dwilliamsceg's Avatar
dwilliamsceg
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rush117
It's a shame that this entertaining thread has to end like this.
All things must pass my friend....
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #1684  
KelVarnson's Avatar
KelVarnson
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 39
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Rush117
It's a shame that this entertaining thread has to end like this.
I agree! Let's keep it civil! This "argument" is going to continue forever, whether this thread survives or not. Better to keep it contained and focused here
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #1685  
Rush117's Avatar
Rush117
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
All things must pass my friend....
Better to let it pass due to lack of interest then like a kidney stone. Bill may be young, he's been right, he's been wrong, but what he is not is a troll.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #1686  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
To me, that is what is comes down to. I have pulled the same load with both and it is night and day. You can bash all you want but each of you know that if you could afford a PSD or other diesel, and use it to tow,. you would have purchase one. There you go, I said it. Bash all you want. I really dont care. For the morons to say that thie v10 will outpull and outlast and is an overall better motor than a Cat C9 due to the v10 having higher HP, you a F'ing morons. Ban me if you want, I don't care. Below are numbers.

I can't wait for BillTroll to tell me that the v10 is a better pulling motor.

Cat C9
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="evenrow" width="30%">Horsepower</td> <td class="evenrow" width="70%">335 to 350 @ 2200 rpm</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="oddrow" width="30%">Torque</td> <td class="oddrow" width="70%">1150-1250 lb-ft @ 1400 rpm</td></tr></tbody></table>
V10
2007 - Max HP - 362 @ 4750 rpm
2007 - Max Torque - 457 @ 3250 rpm
yes, it will out pull a cat, it has more HP. It will not last doing so, but it will out pull it.
why are you calling me " billtroll " ?
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #1687  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by KelVarnson
I disagree with this approach. As you said earlier in the same post, the trucks are geared according to the engines they have. If this is about finding out which truck is better for towing (gas or diesel), then it seems like the two trucks ought to be optimized for their particular engines. Otherwise you truly are comparing apples to oranges.
thats the thing though, 3.73 is not the optimum towing gear for the psd. its the optimum all around gear, but the simple fact is that a psd with 4.30's will accelerate faster than the same psd with 3.73's. same with the v10. 4.30's are the optimum towing gear, but 4.10's are probably the best all around gear.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #1688  
dwilliamsceg's Avatar
dwilliamsceg
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bill11012
yes, it will out pull a cat, it has more HP. It will not last doing so, but it will out pull it.
why are you calling me " billtroll " ?
I have gone over the troll statement before. For the last week or so I and a bunch of people have posted quantitative and researched information to which you ignore. Instead you post inane and unresearched comments that often are meant to do nothing than to stir the pot. That, sir, is the definition of a web troll.

I first started posting in this thread because I was really interested in this topic. It soon became clear that this was not meant to be a real discussion but a venting platform for v10 gassers to talk **** about the PSDs. Most of of the "your motor sucks" comes from the gas community. Why? Like I have posted, I have owned both and enjoyed both but there is absolutely no comparison in overall towing capacity.

And again, I have posted well researched and thought out comments, often to you. You rarely if ever answer them instead moving on to another asinine assertion like that a v10 has more usable power than a C9. Dude, are you for real? Have you ever driven a diesel truck?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #1689  
dwilliamsceg's Avatar
dwilliamsceg
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bill11012
yes, it will out pull a cat, it has more HP. It will not last doing so, but it will out pull it.
why are you calling me " billtroll " ?
What you don't understand is the demarcation between theoretical and practical application. How would a v10 get the load moving and maintain speed. Even if it could get the load to move at the redline of 5200, how long would that motor and drive system last? The term "out pull" is not a 200' foot, one time test. It is the ability to do work over thoussands of miles. This is why OTR trucks are deisels. If turbo charged Saab has more HP than a 6.4, does that mean that it can "out pull" a 6.4 PSD? Of course not. This is the absurdity of the your logic.

But alas, this is why I stopped explaining government fundamentals to my puppy. He will just never get it. So, this is my last post. I will be out enjoying my truck and you guys can sit in here and circle jerk each other on why your v10s are better than my 6.4 at pulling stuff across the country.

D.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #1690  
KelVarnson's Avatar
KelVarnson
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 39
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by phillips91
thats the thing though, 3.73 is not the optimum towing gear for the psd. its the optimum all around gear, but the simple fact is that a psd with 4.30's will accelerate faster than the same psd with 3.73's. same with the v10. 4.30's are the optimum towing gear, but 4.10's are probably the best all around gear.
OK, I understand. But you do have to look at the whole picture. If you put 4:30's in a PSD, it will for sure out-accelerate the V10, but it will also top out at a pretty low speed, won't it?

Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
You rarely if ever answer them instead moving on to another asinine assertion like that a v10 has more usable power than a C9. Dude, are you for real? Have you ever driven a diesel truck?
Well, you posted the numbers right there showing that the Cat has less power than the V10, what would you expect him to do with that? Sure, the Cat has tons of torque, which is very useful for a lot of things, but ultimately the V10 will do more work, at its peak power, than the Cat will at its peak power. It is right there in black and white, in your post.

That doesn't mean the V10 is a better motor, or that it's better for towing than the Cat (I'm sure it's not!), but the V10 will do more work. If it doesn't, someone is lying about their numbers.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #1691  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
I have gone over the troll statement before. For the last week or so I and a bunch of people have posted quantitative and researched information to which you ignore. Instead you post inane and unresearched comments that often are meant to do nothing than to stir the pot. That, sir, is the definition of a web troll.

I first started posting in this thread because I was really interested in this topic. It soon became clear that this was not meant to be a real discussion but a venting platform for v10 gassers to talk **** about the PSDs. Most of of the "your motor sucks" comes from the gas community. Why? Like I have posted, I have owned both and enjoyed both but there is absolutely no comparison in overall towing capacity.

And again, I have posted well researched and thought out comments, often to you. You rarely if ever answer them instead moving on to another asinine assertion like that a v10 has more usable power than a C9. Dude, are you for real? Have you ever driven a diesel truck?
Ok, I am sorry if I come across like that, I do not mean to.
I do not talk **** about the Power Stroke, I just think that the V10 is better.
I already said that my truck is a dog from a stop,that a PSD has it there and that at high elevation I would be down in first gear at 4000 RPM well a Power stroke was still pulling like it was at see level. I really am trying to have a fair discussion about this.
I have driven a stock 7.3, towing with about 12,000 GCWR in the hills.
It has a lot more power than the V10 at low RPM vs low RPM, but if you floor both, the V10 leaves the 7.3 behind. BTW, the V10 I am comparing it to is a 98 with the lowest HP of all of them.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #1692  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by bill11012
yes, it will out pull a cat, it has more HP. It will not last doing so, but it will out pull it.
why are you calling me " billtroll " ?
i would just recommend spending a few days behind the wheel of a diesel so youll appreciate the torque. youre not going to change your mind about this hp stuff until you do. like i said before, my 5.4 has more hp than my 7.3 but it wont pull its own self up hills in 5th gear that my 7.3 will pull 10k up without even having to run it hard. i dont have anything against the v10. as a matter of fact i think its one of the best towing stock gas engines ever built by any manufacturer. the chevy 8.1 was pretty stout too with its 345 hp and 455 lbs of tq (you laughed at me earlier for mentioning the silverado). but its no diesel.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #1693  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by phillips91
i would just recommend spending a few days behind the wheel of a diesel so youll appreciate the torque. youre not going to change your mind about this hp stuff until you do. like i said before, my 5.4 has more hp than my 7.3 but it wont pull its own self up hills in 5th gear that my 7.3 will pull 10k up without even having to run it hard. i dont have anything against the v10. as a matter of fact i think its one of the best towing stock gas engines ever built by any manufacturer. the chevy 8.1 was pretty stout too with its 345 hp and 455 lbs of tq (you laughed at me earlier for mentioning the silverado). but its no diesel.
sorry, when you said silverado, I forgot about the 8.1.
I know next to nothing about it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #1694  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by KelVarnson
OK, I understand. But you do have to look at the whole picture. If you put 4:30's in a PSD, it will for sure out-accelerate the V10, but it will also top out at a pretty low speed, won't it?
i have 4.10's in my 7.3 and i am doing about 2500 rpms at 70 mph. with 4.30s i would probably be doing about 2800 rpm. it redlines at 3600, so it would still have plenty of pedal left. it would probably top out at about 85-90 with the 4.30's. faster than i have any reason to drive a truck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #1695  
bucci's Avatar
bucci
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 843
Likes: 6
From: Jessup, PA
Originally Posted by dwilliamsceg
So, this is my last post.
D.
In this thread or the entire forum?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE