2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

2020 revealed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #241  
Old 03-13-2019, 08:25 PM
Stinson1's Avatar
Stinson1
Stinson1 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 155
Received 28 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Lariatdriver


I had hard time following you, The transmission in the F150 is not the same tranny coming in the F350 SD truck. The beauty of 10 speed will keep the new 6.7 in the sweet spot....I hope it changes gears often just for that reason. Finally, controlling EGTs will be much easier , there’s always a waiting gear to lower the temp. Pulling a heavy load just got easier.
Yes pulling a heavy load will be easier. You are right, I jest felt it was too busy and that I preferred the 6 speed. Without a doubt from a performance standpoint while towing the 10 speed will allow the engine to operate in the sweet spot as you say. The 6.7 and 6 speed is overkill for my 10k trailer so I’m good with it.
 
  #242  
Old 03-13-2019, 08:32 PM
Lariatdriver's Avatar
Lariatdriver
Lariatdriver is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Nevada
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Stinson1


Yes pulling a heavy load will be easier. You are right, I jest felt it was too busy and that I preferred the 6 speed. Without a doubt from a performance standpoint while towing the 10 speed will allow the engine to operate in the sweet spot as you say. The 6.7 and 6 speed is overkill for my 10k trailer so I’m good with it.
Nothing wrong with liking the 6 speed. It’s been a great transmission and will provide years of service.

Should you start towing heavy 5th wheels the 10 speed would be worth it. I’m seeing plenty of these toy haulers with 3 axles 40 feet long, perfect for the new 10 speed.
 
  #243  
Old 03-13-2019, 09:12 PM
super 6.8's Avatar
super 6.8
super 6.8 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern KS
Posts: 1,357
Received 68 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Stinson1


I think you guys are hopefully optimistic. I had enough data to make and education decision to best suite my needs and wants. 1000bft lbs feels great when you are in the correct rpm band, but don’t think that the shift calibration will be tuned for performance. It will be tuned for emissions, meaning fuel economy and that will
place you below the torque you will want to feel during normal driving. Like I said when you are on it the 10 speed is awesome. I am optimistic they sort out drive-ability as well.

Oh and by the way I am a mechanical engineer in heavy duty diesel engine development by profession. I do understand, just sharing my experience since I have had to opportunity to own and drive a 10speed.

That makes no sense. They are not the same thing.
 
  #244  
Old 03-14-2019, 06:25 AM
George C's Avatar
George C
George C is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WNY
Posts: 2,866
Received 504 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by super 6.8
That makes no sense. They are not the same thing.
Correct. His resume may need to include that he was part of the college entrance scandal.
 
  #245  
Old 03-14-2019, 06:28 AM
George C's Avatar
George C
George C is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WNY
Posts: 2,866
Received 504 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Or not understanding that a transmission shifting and keeping an engine in the optimal powerband is somehow a bad thing. Same as the guys complaining the 5.0 and 6.2 is screaming when pulling grade. All those components are designed that way by highly qualified engineers... funny keyboard commandos somehow know more than Ford.
Keyboard commando?
Try rereading the post to whom I responded before punching at thin air. I agree with your position that the 10 speed is a positive, and that I’m waiting for it.

For those who moved to buy the 6 speed, congrats on getting the transmission that is right for you.
For those of us who are grasping what benefits await, nothing more needs to be said.
 
  #246  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:15 AM
Stinson1's Avatar
Stinson1
Stinson1 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 155
Received 28 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by George C


Keyboard commando?
Try rereading the post to whom I responded before punching at thin air. I agree with your position that the 10 speed is a positive, and that I’m waiting for it.

For those who moved to buy the 6 speed, congrats on getting the transmission that is right for you.
For those of us who are grasping what benefits await, nothing more needs to be said.
Agree, for the buyer who spends a good deal of time towing heavy the 10 speed will provide a great advantage. Tow haul mode with 10R80 and a trailer was impressive.
 
  #247  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:38 AM
tony m 6.7's Avatar
tony m 6.7
tony m 6.7 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
OK, on another note, since Ford hasn't announced the new 6.7 specs, I'm gonna take a guess here......475-480 HP and 1030-1100 FT LBS torque.
 
  #248  
Old 03-14-2019, 07:57 AM
glrret's Avatar
glrret
glrret is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Maine
Posts: 512
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tony m 6.7
OK, on another note, since Ford hasn't announced the new 6.7 specs, I'm gonna take a guess here......475-480 HP and 1030-1100 FT LBS torque.
Okay with the increase of HP and Torque on the pickup trucks, what do you think they will do with the F450, F550 Cab & Chassis or are those trucks limited by some Federal regulation?
 
  #249  
Old 03-14-2019, 09:04 AM
George C's Avatar
George C
George C is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WNY
Posts: 2,866
Received 504 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by tony m 6.7
OK, on another note, since Ford hasn't announced the new 6.7 specs, I'm gonna take a guess here......475-480 HP and 1030-1100 FT LBS torque.
Increments Ford uses are just enough to claim the lead, and not much more. I see 10 hp more and 10 lbs. of torque increase over the Cummins. 1010 lbs, with a remote possibility of 1015.

Even this may be up in the air for the SRW trucks because if I am reading right, the Cummins in the SRW trucks offer much less power (370/800) than the 1000 lbs advertised for the 3500 trucks.
If that happens, the reasons to wait for the 2020 have just decreased.



 
  #250  
Old 03-14-2019, 09:31 AM
Scorpion67's Avatar
Scorpion67
Scorpion67 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by someday
ditto, wish it was 7.5 or just call it 7.5
if they’re going to make iup a size to call it, just go with 16.8. Sounds better than 7.5.
 
  #251  
Old 03-14-2019, 10:10 AM
someday's Avatar
someday
someday is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
correct me if im wrong but arent there engines out there that are not exactly the sizes as stated?
 
  #252  
Old 03-14-2019, 11:24 AM
Y2KW57's Avatar
Y2KW57
Y2KW57 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,677
Received 3,342 Likes on 1,750 Posts
Originally Posted by glrret
Okay with the increase of HP and Torque on the pickup trucks, what do you think they will do with the F450, F550 Cab & Chassis or are those trucks limited by some Federal regulation?
The manner in which a chassis cab engine is certified for emissions is defined by Federal regulation, and those regulations are different for completed vehicles (pickups) versus incomplete vehicles (chassis cabs).

With pickups, since they are complete, the entire truck is certified as a chassis. With chassis cabs, which are incomplete, only the engine is certified on a dyno.

Hence the difference between chassis cert vs dyno cert.

The terms can be confusing, since it is chassis cabs that get the dyno cert, and the pickups that get the chassis cert.... but when you think about it, the pickups are complete vehicles, thus the entire chassis can be certified, whereas the chassis cabs are incomplete vehicles, where the final weight and frontal area of the vehicle cannot be known prior to primary sale, so only the engine can be certified on a dyno.

This difference in emission certification process accounts for the lionshare of difference in HP/TQ ratings between pick ups and chassis cabs, but there are other reasons for differences as well.

Let's take the new 2019/20 Chevy Silverado trucks as an example. The 6.6L V8 Duramax L5P is GM's current state of the art diesel engine RPO for pickups. But this year, GM also reintroduced a medium duty chassis cab line up, built by International, that also use a similar 6.6L V8 Duramax diesel, but code named L5D. Not only are the ratings different due to the difference in certification process... the hard parts for breathing are different as well. The chassis cab L5D uses a smaller turbo, for quicker spool up to move heavier loads from a standing start. Similar changes in hard parts for predictive duty cycle optimization has been done by Ford on the 6.7L Powerstroke as well, with turbocharger differences between the pickups vs the chassis cabs.

Smart money doesn't buy a truck based on the advertised HP or TQ number... but a lot of money is spent based on those two numbers... so vehicle manufacturers chase after that money in vehicles destined for consumer use.
 
  #253  
Old 03-14-2019, 12:51 PM
smokewagun's Avatar
smokewagun
smokewagun is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 2,101
Received 57 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Scorpion67

if they’re going to make iup a size to call it, just go with 16.8. Sounds better than 7.5.
Ford backed into the design, which resulted in 7.3L, NOT picked it to get an edge with the old diesel 7.3L. It was discussed in the very first marketing video.
 
  #254  
Old 03-14-2019, 05:09 PM
Y2KW57's Avatar
Y2KW57
Y2KW57 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,677
Received 3,342 Likes on 1,750 Posts
Originally Posted by smokewagun
Ford backed into the design, which resulted in 7.3L, NOT picked it to get an edge with the old diesel 7.3L. It was discussed in the very first marketing video.
Keyword there = "marketing".
 
  #255  
Old 03-14-2019, 05:22 PM
smokewagun's Avatar
smokewagun
smokewagun is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 2,101
Received 57 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Y2KW57
Keyword there = "marketing".
Yeah... market. Well, I suppose I can say the same about my P.O.S 2018 5.0L. They marketed it on a number, which was tried and true. But the 2018 is actually larger than the old 302 (5.0L). 😡 I was sold a bill of goods. I bought it as the most dependable of the mills available. NOT.
 


Quick Reply: 2020 revealed!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.