When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Our van is the same way after a while, 318, doesn't run very hot but if you're on the highway for hours the doghouse gets kind of hot on the sides. Especially fun when you get over 65 MPH and the doghouse starts to lift up a bit because you're too lazy to put the retaining screws in and just use the side clips
Back in the '80's I had a Dodge work van ('the Black Mariah' or 'the Paddy Wagon') with a 318.
That thing was an oven in the summer.
A/C never did work.
Vent windows open, your calf's still cooked...
Back in the '80's I had a Dodge work van ('the Black Mariah' or 'the Paddy Wagon') with a 318.
That thing was an oven in the summer.
A/C never did work.
Vent windows open, your calf's still cooked...
"The bang bus". We've taken ours on several long trips, some 3500 miles. Last one was all through western Oregon then to the redwoods in northern California. 5? years ago. Running I5, 95-100 degrees, no A/C except for the 2-60 A/C. 2 wing windows, 60 MPH. One day we went 352 miles on the hottest day. Stopped in Grants Pass, OR. The hottest hell hole in Oregon I've ever been to - the desert. Definitely not fun. Did yours have the floor vents? ours does. Ours is a regular passenger van, not a work van. Man those things are made cheap....
You can only imagine a flat black van in the sun, with no side or rear windows and no headliner...
It was rickety but seemed indestructible.
It was over 30 years ago.
I forget if there were any floor vents.
Looking forward to Gary's updates as his engine comes together.
Ours is two tone blue, with a white top. We've had it for 29 years, it's getting kind of sad looking. Leaks water from every damn body seam when it rains, so it stays in the garage about 80% of the year. Always has leaked like that. Time to replace it but can't afford to replace it...
As I think about it, there is quite a bit of work to do before the engine is together. In fact, I just realized that it'll be dangling from the crane until I go out and find some 5" bolts to attach it to the engine stand. And even when I have the bolts it'll be somewhat of a pain getting it on the stand as the stand I'm going to use has legs that don't play nicely with the crane's legs.
And then there's getting the shop ready for the GTG on Saturday. Lots and lots and lots of things to put away. Maybe I'll get started on the engine next week.
Good looking build Gary! I may refresh my 351m to a 400 but I don't think I can bring myself to spend the cash for the T Meyer type build. I have really debated just throwing a 351w in it.
Thanks! W's are good engines, but w/o stroking they won't have the torque of a 400. And changing to one isn't easy as you need new perches and a new tranny.
Good looking build Gary! I may refresh my 351m to a 400 but I don't think I can bring myself to spend the cash for the T Meyer type build. I have really debated just throwing a 351w in it.
I think it's well worth it even with a baseline TMeyer kit, like I got. Hard to argue with over 400ft-lbs carb'd
Thanks! W's are good engines, but w/o stroking they won't have the torque of a 400. And changing to one isn't easy as you need new perches and a new tranny.
I disagree. The correct combination of parts on a stock stroke Windsor will trump a 400 in stock configuration. You don't need to stroke a Windsor to make power; it's just easier if you do.
Everyone knows torque is a direct result of stroke (leverage)
Darn 400 has more stroke than my 460!
It may have more stroke but in stock form a 460 will wreck it, at least on paper with the 460s 385 lb-ft vs the 400s high-200-something lb-ft, which damn near equal to a factory Windsor. In fact some years the little 351 out torqued the 400 in stock configuration with a factory rating of 305lb-ft; something the 400 NEVER once saw during its entire production run; however not until the introduction of EFI. But it is still a Windsor. The Windsor was built for 45 years for a reason, outliving the 335 series by a lot; and those engines were designed to be the Windsors replacement. Think that says a lot.
That said when you start throwing money at a 400; they can build power, but it is much more cost effective to build a Windsor. People call M blocks turds for a reason. But being a Ford man I love them all.
Hard to compare in stock form as the two engines didn't exist in the same vehicles at the same time. And time determined where Ford was in its experience with smog rules. So comparing different years is comparing different emissions packages, which isn't a good comparison.
Having said that, Jim is right - stroke equals mechanical advantage, which creates torque. While my degree in physics is a few years old, they still haven't repealed that law. Nor the laws of thermodynamics which, poorly applied, say that the amount of air/fuel mix you can get into and out of a cylinder determines the amount of expansion/thrust you can get on an engine. If it weren't for having about 20 FTE'ers at the shop today I would do a comparison on the port sizes of a Windsor vs an M/400 stock intake, head, and exhaust. There's a huge difference - in favor of the 335 Series.
All that says that with the same compression a stock 400 will be much stronger than a stock Windsor. The key is the compression.