When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Nearly 850 pages, and I still don't think I've seen the best reason for not owing a diesel: You avoid the possibility of being associated with the arrogance of certain diesel owners.
Why would any one want a V-10 when you can get a diesel? That's just silly!
Come on dude. If you own a diesel then you should know why someone would own a v10. There's a lot of uses for a truck that not done everyday. There's guys that just pull a camper, racecar, or boat a few times a year. It would cost them at least $180 a year for maintance to own a psd compaired to $50-60 for the v10 just to put less than 10k miles a year on the truck.
Be honest when have you ran circles around a v10? Its not going to happen. We have an advantage on the low end with our psds after that its all v10. Do kid yourself the 6.8 is a force to reckon with. I know I work beside one often.
I thought it was interesting that a particular 6.0 was lauded as having reached 100K miles. Without any work.
But it's not interesting that a 6.0 "has to have the Bullet Proofing done before it is relaible"? Come on, your bias is showing.
I didn't "laud" anything. I simply said I have a 6.0 at work with 100k of hard hauling miles on it with zero bullet proofing. And it's been reliable. Not completely perfect, but reliable.
Of course my V10 with at the time 75k on it sent me limping back to the campgound, aborting the trip home due to a toasted COP and wire.
With about 80k on it it sent me limping back to the Disney campground aborting THAT trip home due to a faulty IAC.
[B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=navy]Never said it HAD to be done. Only has the be done if you want to be SURE you won't blow the engine up. (Or WHEN you do.) I'm sure there's a few that never need headgaskets... but that seems to be the exception not the rule. Ones that haven't had then YET...is just that...YET.
Actually you did . You said "bullet proofing has to be done in order to make it reliable". You also said it had to be done to be sure you wouldn't blow it up.
My truck has been reliable over the span of 100k hard miles with no so called bullet proofing. Is that laudable, as someone claimed I alluded to? Not to me it isn't, but based on your (and others as well) claims it is.
You can blow up ANY engine, bullet proofing not withstanding. How stupid do you want to get with the skinny pedal?
Nearly 850 pages, and I still don't think I've seen the best reason for not owing a diesel: You avoid the possibility of being associated with the arrogance of certain diesel owners.
not doing the studs/deletes on a 6.0 is like not putting your seatbelt on while driving. you can say the likelihood of an accident is unlikely, and get away with not wearin one. or you can get in an accident and wish ya wore it. (with exception to the small percentage of accidents where seat belts actually proved deadly)
The other day I was cruising down the Hwy in the heat of the day(about 103*) at a speed which shall not be mentioned. Engine was turning 2900RPM and I have 3.55 gears.
Nearly 850 pages, and I still don't think I've seen the best reason for not owing a diesel: You avoid the possibility of being associated with the arrogance of certain diesel owners.
Words like that usually come from people with self security issues.
Nearly 850 pages, and I still don't think I've seen the best reason for not owing a diesel: You avoid the possibility of being associated with the arrogance of certain diesel owners.
What about the arrogance of v10 owners? There's some that thought they where the only ones that knew who to use google and a caculator. Matter of fact I don't recall you or the others being man enough to admit another truck could do something better than your's. Hmmm want to talk about arrogance.
I was actually serious bought putting one in my kit cobra! But weight was the deciding factor against it, a MGB front suspension is marginal at best for an aluminum headed Cleveland motor, I still haven't given up on it, as soon as I come up with a wrecked viper to steal the front running gear from, its going under the wrench again, but until then the only V-10 in my shop is a mock up motor.
But it's not interesting that a 6.0 "has to have the Bullet Proofing done before it is relaible"? Come on, your bias is showing.
Of course I'm baised, I own a V10
Originally Posted by tgreening
I didn't "laud" anything. I simply said I have a 6.0 at work with 100k of hard hauling miles on it with zero bullet proofing. And it's been reliable. Not completely perfect, but reliable.
Not completely perfect? How so?
Originally Posted by tgreening
Of course my V10 with at the time 75k on it sent me limping back to the campgound, aborting the trip home due to a toasted COP and wire.
With about 80k on it it sent me limping back to the Disney campground aborting THAT trip home due to a faulty IAC.
I guess V10s must be crap engines eh?
"COP and wire" ? Toasted how? I'm curious more than anything, I'm always on the lookout for V10 oddities.
Of course, it didn't blow the head gaskets when it did this, right?
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.