When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yep...and if you did 10-15 pages in on either the V10 or 6.4 problems pages, you start getting duplicates, or junk. Google is not as great as they hype themselves to be.
Yep...and if you did 10-15 pages in on either the V10 or 6.4 problems pages, you start getting duplicates, or junk. Google is not as great as they hype themselves to be.
If you know how to use it, and understand it's limitations, it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Doesn't that apply everywhere?
Than if someone can't notice the difference between one place with 100% match and 39,000 of others that have few percent >>>> that might be very long road to the success.
If you know how to use it, and understand it's limitations, it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I know how to use it, and when I'm looking for something, it narrows things down for me from time to time. I posted my examples since one of the V10 owners decided to quote Google results like it was gospel on the numbers of issues by engine type. The funny thing is you didn't bother saying anything to him about how Google results are like that commercial for The Ladders where everyone runs out onto the tennis court trying to play....I love that commercial.
why are you gassers talking about torque? Hell i thought horsepower is all that mattered when towing.
Originally Posted by 2001400ex
I was just about to post the exact same thing. I thought only horsepower mattered.
Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
Only when it's convenient to them...It's called doublespeak.
It's not doublespeak, it is just speaking the truth and understanding how an equation works. HP = tq x rpm/5252. As rpm's decrease, tq has to increase for hp to stay the same. As rpm's increase you can get by with less tq and maintain the same hp. You can't have low rpms and low tq and expect to make high hp. So yes, HP is all that matters when it comes to engine power. Either high tq or high rpms will get you the same result. When it comes to putting that power to the ground, gearing becomes a part of the equation. Tractive force = hp x 5252/wheel rpm.
It's not doublespeak, it is just speaking the truth and understanding how an equation works. HP = tq x rpm/5252. As rpm's decrease, tq has to increase for hp to stay the same. As rpm's increase you can get by with less tq and maintain the same hp. You can't have low rpms and low tq and expect to make high hp. So yes, HP is all that matters when it comes to engine power. Either high tq or high rpms will get you the same result. When it comes to putting that power to the ground, gearing becomes a part of the equation. Tractive force = hp x 5252/wheel rpm.
I can agree, and admit that I agree with your statement. However, I'll take the lower RPM's for towing around here than screaming up a mountainside. I finally saw a V10 here at the liquor store as I was picking up a 6pk of Fat Tire. I talked for a little bit with the guy, and he's going to trade it in. He says it feels like he lopped off 4 cylinders since he moved here from Cali 3 months ago. He's only getting 11mpg too. If my PSD was getting 11mpg, it would be gone, and that's the truth. I'd buy a 4cyl Bongo Truck complete with Jingle Lights.
Na mileage aint bad on anything just going 4 miles
If you compare the average mpg's(instead of the highest for one driving empty vs the lowest of the other idling for 8 hours and pulling 10k lbs), the v10 is not too far behind the 6.0 and 6.4.
It's not doublespeak, it is just speaking the truth and understanding how an equation works. HP = tq x rpm/5252. As rpm's decrease, tq has to increase for hp to stay the same. As rpm's increase you can get by with less tq and maintain the same hp. You can't have low rpms and low tq and expect to make high hp. So yes, HP is all that matters when it comes to engine power. Either high tq or high rpms will get you the same result. When it comes to putting that power to the ground, gearing becomes a part of the equation. Tractive force = hp x 5252/wheel rpm.
So how much TQ does the v10 have left at 5k? Let's have a show of hands of people who can keep their truck at 5k? Thanks for the forumal brother I'm going to play.
I can agree, and admit that I agree with your statement. However, I'll take the lower RPM's for towing around here than screaming up a mountainside.
Glad we finally agree on something I like the low rpm power of the diesel, and that is why I would give it my vote for better all around towing engine if all other things were equal(ease and cost of maintenance, reliability, etc). I am just arguing that the v10 can pull anything just as good as the psd if it has a chance to get its rpm's up and that getting the rpm's up on it is not going to hurt it.
Originally Posted by exiled
So how much TQ does the v10 have left at 5k? Let's have a show of hands of people who can keep their truck at 5k? Thanks for the forumal brother I'm going to play.
The formula to calculate tq if you know the hp is tq=hp x 5252/rpm. The v10 has 362 hp at 5200 rpm, so tq would be 362x5252/5200=365 tq. Like we talked about earlier though, engine tq means nothing once it has to go through the tranny and rear end gearing.
To do the formula for tractive force you also have to know wheel rpm. Wheel rpm is engine rpm/final drive ratio. Final drive ratio is tranny gear x rear end gear. For example, my truck has a 4.10 gear and is in 1st gear(5.72 tranny ratio). My final drive ratio is 4.10 x 5.72=23.45. If my engine is turning 4,500 rpm my wheel rpm is 4,500/23.45=192. So my tractive force in 1st gear at 4,500 rpm is 260 hp x 5252/192=7,112.
If you compare the average mpg's(instead of the highest for one driving empty vs the lowest of the other idling for 8 hours and pulling 10k lbs), the v10 is not too far behind the 6.0 and 6.4.
The numbers I'm using is real world numbers. I get 18mpg mt. My friends 07 v10 gets 13 mt. When we gross 20k I get 12 he gets 8. When I haul hay. It weighs 18k-20k itself I drom to 10. Have gone as low as 9.
The numbers I'm using is real world numbers. I get 18mpg mt. My friends 07 v10 gets 13 mt. When we gross 20k I get 12 he gets 8. When I haul hay. It weighs 18k-20k itself I drom to 10. Have gone as low as 9.
I am just saying that there have been several times people have done a mpg comparison and they will use something like Chargerfan's 19 mpgs unloaded and compare it to Bill's 8 mpg's when he spent 6-8 hours idling installing fence posts and then spent the rest of the tank hauling 10k lbs at 90 mph. Mpg's can vary so much that about the only valid comparison is the same driver, pulling the same trailer, on the same road, at the same speed, etc. The average 6.0 or 6.4 mileage that I see is between 15-18 unloaded and the average v10 is 13-15. That is close enough that the fuel cost alone will offset the mpg difference.
Comparing yours to your friends grossing 20k, without writing a page and a half with all of the math, it would take you 112,500 miles to make up the price difference in the 6.0 and v10 based on your fuel savings of 12 vs 8 mpg's, and that is factoring in zero maintenance costs for either. For people that drive a lot of miles and keep their trucks until they wear out, the psd will more than pay for itself over the life of the truck.