Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #4321  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Between oil changes I spend about $3000 on fuel for my PS.
That is easy saving of over $1000 comparing to V10 in the same truck. I think I can afford to spend $100 extra on oil change. Just put Mobil1 synthetic in it and send old samples to Blackstone. The good workhorse deserves it.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 11:48 AM
  #4322  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Well crap, you start looking at that kind of fuel savings and I don't know what to say.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #4323  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by bill11012
Well crap, you start looking at that kind of fuel savings and I don't know what to say.
The average person will never see the kind of miles I do, so my fuel savings won't apply to everyone. The less they drive, the less they have to worry about those expensive oil changes too though. With my job I put more miles on a vehicle in 6 months than most people will put on theirs in 20 years, so fuel savings are a big deal to me and I will see that $27k in savings in just a couple of years.

Another reason I like the diesel is the durability. I was wearing gassers out every 6 months and I got tired of buying new ones. I would buy a good used one with 70-75k miles on it and in 6 months it would be at 125-150k and worn out. My 5.0 is still going strong at 220k, but all my other high mileage(125k) gassers either limped to the dealer to get traded in or have the engine sitting in my garage waiting to be rebuilt.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #4324  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
You got 19mpg towing 7k lbs?


Mine gets 16mpg empty on the hwy!
My last truck (7.3l - dually) would get around 9mpg towing 8-9k.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #4325  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by IB Adrian
You got 19mpg towing 7k lbs?


Mine gets 16mpg empty on the hwy!
Stay out of the turbo, don't floor it to pass people and take your time pulling out from a stop and you can get just as good mpg's towing as you do empty. I have an open trailer, so there isn't much wind resistance either. Once you get a load moving it doesn't take any more power to keep it moving(on the mythbusters mpg's episode) as long as there isn't much added wind resistance.

Edit-My 7.3 is also a bone stock OBS, reb cab, manual, XL with no options. The same as my 5.4, so a fair comparison as far as set ups go. I don't doubt your mpg claims either. There are too many variables in driving style, mods, trailer resistance, terrain, etc, to make a fair comparison. But both of my trucks pull the same trailer, on the same road, with the same driver, so it doesn't get much more fair than that. I make the same offer to anyone though. I will run a tank of gas out pulling what I say I pull and if I get the mileage I say I get, you fill my tank back up and then give me enough money to fill my next tank up for wasting my time.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:13 PM
  #4326  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Well... Josh you are killing the thread.
After several thousands replies, the gaser owners lost the final arguments
I can only confirm your observation that diesel mpg drop while hauling is minimal. With 9000 lb forklift on flatbed my mpg dropped about 5%.
With 5000 lb lowboy trailer with dovetail, my mpg seems to even increase. I tow it slightly slower, so that is a factor, but I am planning to check it farther.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #4327  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
I have done the math, with the number of miles I drive the 7.3 would be a very slight savings in cost. But when you start looking at things breaking as it ages, the V10 is still ahead on repair cost.

The V10 has all the durability of the 7.3. You would not wear one out like your other gassers.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #4328  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by IB Adrian
You got 19mpg towing 7k lbs?


Mine gets 16mpg empty on the hwy!
My last truck (7.3l - dually) would get around 9mpg towing 8-9k.
Thats about the fuel mileage my V10 gets.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #4329  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Well... Josh you are killing the thread.
After several thousands replies, the gaser owners lost the final arguments
I can only confirm your observation that diesel mpg drop while hauling is minimal. With 9000 lb forklift on flatbed my mpg dropped about 5%.
With 5000 lb lowboy trailer with dovetail, my mpg seems to even increase. I tow it slightly slower, so that is a factor, but I am planning to check it farther.
And I can refute that with real world figures.

I have a 2005 Excursion 4WD. 3.73 axle,2V 6.8L,4R100.
Running on the highway solo,it gets 15mpg.
In town it gets 12.5mpg.
Towing my 8000ish lb travel trailer is gets 9-10mpg depending on traveling speed and wind.

My good friend has the IDENTICAL same Excursion in a 2001 7.3L.
SAME gears, SAME trans, SAME 4WD.
Running on the highway emtpy-he gets 17mpg.
In town he gets 14mpg.
Towing a travel trailer the same length,profile and weight as mine-he gets 9-10mpg.

JL
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #4330  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by bill11012
I have done the math, with the number of miles I drive the 7.3 would be a very slight savings in cost. But when you start looking at things breaking as it ages, the V10 is still ahead on repair cost.

The V10 has all the durability of the 7.3. You would not wear one out like your other gassers.
The gassers I have worn out haven't been modulars, but I have seen my share of them wearing out too. I have worn out an 01 Explorer with a 4.0, a 2002 Chevy Tahoe with a 5.3, a 90 Bronco II with a 2.9 and a couple of 2.3 four cylinders in various vehicles in the last couple of years. My full sized Bronco has gone through a couple of trannys, but the engine is still original. I have done a TON of work to it over the years though.

If you compare the common parts that wear out as a vehicle ages, the 7.3 costs the same as a v10. Look up the prices on alternators, starters, water pumps, etc. I have priced them at several different places and my 5.4 and 7.3 are always within about $10 of each other.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #4331  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Looks like the mentioned samples of PS are bad engines. I was getting 9 mpg with this set towing at 61 mph with couple of mountains peaks to pass.
What you see on the picture is easy 25,000 lb. Won't even comment on aerodynamics.
Heck -slim chances the motorhome driven alone would get that mpg on its gas engine

 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #4332  
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 4
From: Rogersville, TN
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
And I can refute that with real world figures.

My good friend has the IDENTICAL same Excursion in a 2001 7.3L.
SAME gears, SAME trans, SAME 4WD.
JL
My figures are real world figures too. You are forgetting one thing though. Your real world figures have two different drivers and two different trailers(similar, but not identical). My real world figures have the same size truck, same gears, same tranny, same 4wd, exact same trailer and the same driver. I am also pulling a trailer that has virtually no wind resistance and you aren't. I welcome you to come along for a ride anytime you want to. If you are ever in this area just look me up.

Edit-As far as gassers losing more mpg's when loaded than a diesel, there is a simple reason for that in my case. On flat ground, you would be correct. With my car hauler I can cruise along in 5th gear with either my 5.4 or my 7.3 on flat ground all day long and barely see a change in mpg's in either of them. The problem is, there isn't much flat ground around here. At 65 mph my 7.3 is right in the middle of its power band and doesn't have to downshift when I hit a hill. My 5.4 has to downshift and turn 4000 rpm to make the same power my 7.3 does at 2500 rpm. That uses a heck of a lot more fuel.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #4333  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by phillips91
My figures are real world figures too. You are forgetting one thing though. Your real world figures have two different drivers and two different trailers(similar, but not identical). My real world figures have the same size truck, same gears, same tranny, same 4wd, exact same trailer and the same driver. I am also pulling a trailer that has virtually no wind resistance and you aren't. I welcome you to come along for a ride anytime you want to. If you are ever in this area just look me up.
This is driving the same route at the same speed following each other-him leading some, me leading the remainder. Our trailers are the same height, same length, same weight, same number of axles-his is simply laid out differently than mine. For all practial purposes-the same trailer.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #4334  
CampSpringsJohn's Avatar
CampSpringsJohn
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,069
Likes: 17
From: Melbourne, Ky
The OBS's do typically get better mileage over the super duty's, assuming you have the same setup as far as tranny and differentials. A manual tranny 2 wheel drive will do better than a 4X4 with an automatic too. Drivers habits do need to be taken into account too.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #4335  
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
Thread Starter
|
Modular motor junkie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
And I can refute that with real world figures.

I have a 2005 Excursion 4WD. 3.73 axle,2V 6.8L,4R100.
Running on the highway solo,it gets 15mpg.
In town it gets 12.5mpg.
Towing my 8000ish lb travel trailer is gets 9-10mpg depending on traveling speed and wind.

My good friend has the IDENTICAL same Excursion in a 2001 7.3L.
SAME gears, SAME trans, SAME 4WD.
Running on the highway emtpy-he gets 17mpg.
In town he gets 14mpg.
Towing a travel trailer the same length,profile and weight as mine-he gets 9-10mpg.

JL
Thats more what I would expect for most people/trucks.
The V10 comes out ahead too.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE