Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Gas vs PSD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #1486  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 429law
Now we have the cat diesel's yes I said CAT.
What is everyone's big thing with caterpillar engines? Everyone refers to them like they're the undisputed king of the diesel world.

Hate to break it to you folks, but cat(or is it CAT) is the undisputed loser. They aren't making highway engines anymore because the competition ran them out. Couldn't design a reliable emissions compliant diesel, so they stopped trying.

Why does everyone think they're one step short of God?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #1487  
429law's Avatar
429law
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
kings of the world nope, I just found it weird that cat made a small equipment engine for a lawn mower, I prefer yanamar for the small stuff
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #1488  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Yeah, I remember reading awhile ago that they were using little 8 HP caterpillar industrial engines in truck APUs.

I think they make just about everything except truck engines anymore.

It's not your post so much as all the other references to cat that don't make sense to me. Really cracks me up when someone suggests they wish we had a small caterpillar turbodiesel, like the C7, in our trucks instead of the Navistar engines. And they thought the newer PSDs had problems........

Ever wonder why they paint them yellow?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #1489  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
What is everyone's big thing with caterpillar engines? Everyone refers to them like they're the undisputed king of the diesel world.

Hate to break it to you folks, but cat(or is it CAT) is the undisputed loser. They aren't making highway engines anymore because the competition ran them out. Couldn't design a reliable <NOBR id=itxt_nobr_2_0 style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 100%; COLOR: darkgreen">emissions</NOBR> compliant diesel, so they stopped trying.

Why does everyone think they're one step short of God?
I've always been told the torque output of the CAT engine was better than the competition. CAT has always been heavily into offroad equipment and engines. Trucking is currently down big time also and trucking companies arn't turning around trucks like they used to. Its not that CAT can't make a compliant engine they just probably crunched the numbers and decided it was not worth it anymore and decided to concentrate on there offroad line. Maybe CAT will step back into onroad engines in the future.

The largest engine offered in the F-650 and F-750 for the 2008 model year was the Cummins ISB 325hp@2600rpm 750tq@1800rpm and the C7 CAT 300hp@2200rpm 860tq@1440rpm. Now if you were buying a 650 or 750 which engine would you want? I would rather have the CAT. Only problem with the CAT is the price, they are quite a chunk more than the Cummins from what I'm told.
http://www.f650pickups.com/08ford.html
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 06:44 PM
  #1490  
Quick444's Avatar
Quick444
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 7
From: Anchorage, AK
Club FTE Silver Member

The point of my sig is to help fire people up, just like ol' dude's sig and his mighty V10.

If v10 guys really kissed other guys, I wouldn't have let me Dad consider buying one.


Oh, and I wouldn't doubt Johnny Langton's knowledge of these things. I still remember many of his posts back in the www.modulardepot.com days.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:07 PM
  #1491  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by dkf
I've always been told the torque output of the CAT engine was better than the competition. CAT has always been heavily into offroad equipment and engines. Trucking is currently down big time also and trucking companies arn't turning around trucks like they used to. Its not that CAT can't make a compliant engine they just probably crunched the numbers and decided it was not worth it anymore and decided to concentrate on there offroad line. Maybe CAT will step back into onroad engines in the future.

The largest engine offered in the F-650 and F-750 for the 2008 model year was the Cummins ISB 325hp@2600rpm 750tq@1800rpm and the C7 CAT 300hp@2200rpm 860tq@1440rpm. Now if you were buying a 650 or 750 which engine would you want? I would rather have the CAT. Only problem with the CAT is the price, they are quite a chunk more than the Cummins from what I'm told.
http://www.f650pickups.com/08ford.html
Kind of. A good example is the C15, Cat's largest heavy truck engine. When purchased as a 625 HP engine, it will put out 2050 lb-ft of torque. 600 HP and less come with anywhere between 1550-1850 lb-ft of torque. I've never seen a 625 C15. They all are capable of it, but very rarely will you find one actually setup for it. The C15 in my work truck, for example, is a 435. Take my truck to the caterpillar dealer, fork over some green, and they plug a computer in it and tune the engine for 625.

Cummins ISX is very similar, and it is capable of up to 600 HP and 1850 lb-ft of torque. The ISX only has one VG turbo and is widely considered to be the more reliable of the two.

People complain about their 6.0L PSDs here, where I met a driver one time who had major service done to his Cat C15 7 times in 80,000 miles. That's less than a 9-month period! THIS is largely the reason they got out of the business. The ACERT emissions system is very complex; far more so than either DD or Cummins. Works fine when everything works, but reliability is far below the other manufacturers.

And, after all of this, they still make the ISX. Not so for the C15...or the C7, C9, or C12.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #1492  
Destroya's Avatar
Destroya
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 141
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Ballswedge
Whose bringing the lube?

LMFAO. You guys aren't "funny haha", you're funny..... You know the rest.



Real trucks also have GVWRs in excess of 25k, have stacks for a purpose, displace over 8 liters, and usually have 10+ wheels.

You have a pickup truck, just so happens it's diesel fueled as are many other things such as generators, sunflower heaters, tractors, economy cars and even some riding lawn mowers. I don't claim my kubota diesel powered cub cadet riding lawn mower to be a REAL tractor, as you shouldn't claim to have a REAL truck just because of its fuel.



1. You ALWAYS have to change filters every 10-15k that cost more than all 10 of my plugs combined that I have to change every 100k.

2. Yes, lets talk about the "ejecting" of parts. Or even the "blowing" or "leaking" or how about even the "complete catastrophic failure" of some parts....(that last one should be a Registered Trademark of the Ford Motor Company when used in reference to the "powerstroke diesel") Don't go there, you diesel guys have much more to keep up on than us gassers do, such as EGR coolers, head gaskets and variable vane turbo failures. Two of those little examples cost more to repair on your diesels than the replacement of a complete 2v v10 engine.

If you would take a moment to go over to www.pickuptrucks.com and read the HD shootout test you'll see that yes, the diesel did start with a higher starting speed up a 15% grade with 10k behind it, But after a bit the diesel planed off and was stuck at one speed, the v10 was gaining spped at that point.



And I quote;

"Ford's F-250 and F-350 finally developed some unique performance patterns, even though they are using the same 5-speed TorqueShift transmission. But look at how well the V10 was running at the 250-meter finish line versus the V8 Power Stroke. Again the gasser was traveling faster than the compression ignition motor. The F-350's speedo barely inched up from 100-m to 250-m, while the F-250 gained over 6-mph."

This was going up a 15% grade with a 10k load.

I see PSD trucks on flatbed trailers DAILY. My v10 truck has never seen so much as a repair facility ever. Heck, I've only seen like 8 other V10 trucks period. PSDs are like a**holes, everyone has one.

HEY! I know another couple of things that diesels can do better than gas engines, and we wouldn't want to forget these;

1. leave you stranded often.

2. cost you 2-5 times more to repair and service.

3. get you real friendly with wrecker drivers and service representatives at dealers.

LOL, it's all in fun right?

BTW: the truck in my sig gets 10-13 mpg.
Still by far the best post in this entire thread.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:32 PM
  #1493  
Ballswedge's Avatar
Ballswedge
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Yes I think so too, as pointless and rediculous as this thread is.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #1494  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 95_Dually
On sub 11 second cars this was a problem because of all the boost they were generating. The 12 second cars were very dependable daily drivers. I think a 12 second or even a 14 second V10 truck would be awesome.
Then talk to my machinist who was redoing one of those motors just about every month. Totally stock, they were good for about 30K miles, and that's if you babied it.

I knew someone personally who had one. His lasted 12K before major engine repairs. And those "repairs" included head gaskets going south.

Compared to the T-bird SC (and it's related XR7), they were garbage.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:44 PM
  #1495  
SteveBricks's Avatar
SteveBricks
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 42,085
Likes: 6
From: Lakewood, Ca.
FTE Emeritus
Originally Posted by Destroya
Still by far the best post in this entire thread.
Yes, but be careful with it....it's an antique!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #1496  
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Just posting to see if I make it to page 101..

Damn, didn't.... the C& is a decent engine, they put them in our MRAP's, the 6x6 weighs about 45- 50 thousand pounds, and with a little pedal I can hit 75mph which surprised me for only having 320/750. Hell, I'm making 320/704 at the rear wheels.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #1497  
Pinky Demon's Avatar
Pinky Demon
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Destroya
Still by far the best post in this entire thread.
I hate to say it, but it does contain the most truth.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #1498  
dwilliamsceg's Avatar
dwilliamsceg
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Destroya
Still by far the best post in this entire thread.
The only problem with the post you quote is that it is not inaccurate. It amazes me that with google available for free people cannot do some simple research before posting. Here is where your quoted post is incorrect.

The 6.4 is fundamentally and largely the same motor as the MaxxForce 7. Here is some info
http://maxxforce.com/Application/on-...ct/MaxxForce_7

This motor is used in commercial applications including school buses and delivery trucks, etc. So, to claim that the PSD is simply a toy motor in a toy pickup is not accurate. I don't get the need from the gas community to bash the diesel motor. All of the goods you buy at WalMart were delivered by a diesel vehicle. If gas was really better for these applications, wouldn't companies use gas instead of diesel? The bottom line defines business, so if diesel is so much more costly, why haven't companies adopted gas?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #1499  
Quick444's Avatar
Quick444
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 7
From: Anchorage, AK
Club FTE Silver Member

Lets just solve this the old fashion way.

Have an FTE Get Together for Beers, BBQ, a TON of Bull****ing, and some good old fashion sled pulls and drag racing.

Then people can legitimately mock each other for a year, until the next one. I have little to prove, but I love my truck like everyone else does. I would be at a meet in a heartbeat if Alaska were just a hop skip and a jump away.

We used to do this with the Mustang forums, and invite Camaros and Firebirds. All kinds of stuff went down and then people could tease and humor each other until the next year. Actually was fun too.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 09:08 PM
  #1500  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Why haven't companies adopted gas?
Fuel mileage.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE