Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Superchips 6.0 Microtuner Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #601  
mrc59's Avatar
mrc59
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Metro DC
Club FTE Silver Member

I'm not an expert at this and don't claim to be. I really appreciate your help. My main goal is to increase mileage. So, I may not be the typical SCMT user. I can see how there may be a difference in perception between those that baby the throttle and want mileage and those that routinely put the hammer down. Two different issues completely.

I disengaged the cruise at several speeds, from 35 to 80MPH. Under load, e.g., up hill, and while coasting. I got the bump every time. Almost a "clink" in the driveshaft. I was amazed it happened while not under load. Felt as severe as an inappropriate downshift might feel in a manual. It's a major jolt, not at all subtle.

I tried to voice the shift point issue in an early post, and another member said it much better right after my post. In ECON mode vs. STOCK, I felt as if I had to reach too high an RPM to get an upshift on light throttle. Running higher RPMs seems counter to good mileage.

Amazing that these trucks seem to have individual personalities!

Feel free to email me if you need more info/feedback.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 10:52 PM
  #602  
SpartanDieselTech's Avatar
SpartanDieselTech
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
mine has the driveshaft "bump" too...i think it might be the TC clutch disengaging, and the reason we are feeling it is the fact that the line pressure is boosted by the SCMT....am I even on the right track here, Vic?
Personally, I kind of like it...gives it a rougher *truck* feel...
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:09 PM
  #603  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
The trucks definitely have different personalities.

In fact, if you want to be technical about it...every computer code has it's own personality. Every truck has different tolerances (remember, these trucks are designed by humans and built by humans....or at least human built machines).
No two are exactly the same...I don't care what anyone says.

Sometimes tolerances add up, sometimes they don't....a few thousanths more...a few thousanths less...it all makes a difference.

Then you have calibration...this is a HUGE HUGE variable.
Each calibration is most certainly different....you can usually tell right away if Ford refashes your PCM. Sometimes this is a good change, sometimes you may not like it.
Each calibration must be tuned different than others to get the correct gains, mileage and drivability.

Because of all of these tuning differences, tuning must be done for each calibration and a generic program can not be forced into each truck. This makes constructing a database more difficult and is part of the reason why so much time is spent in R&D

Did you know a 2003 6.0L or early 04 makes nearly 70 ft lbs more torque stock than a late 04 does stock?

I haven't seen two stock trucks put down the same stock numbers yet.....and I'm using a VERY consistent Superflow dyno.
Once they reach optimal temp, one truck will make the same numbers run after run ...when you strap down another truck it all changes.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 02:39 AM
  #604  
Twin Tritons's Avatar
Twin Tritons
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 3
From: Fairbanks, AK
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
Did you know a 2003 6.0L or early 04 makes nearly 70 ft lbs more torque stock than a late 04 does stock?
Will an early 04 with a tuner and a late 04 with a tuner make the same amount of torque or will the late 04 always make 70 ft. lbs. less? Just wondering if the difference was in the computer or physical changes to the engine.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #605  
jdadamsjr's Avatar
jdadamsjr
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 4
An early 03 WITH pilot injection or one that has be detuned by the "black" flash


OBTW, the stock 6-oh's at our dyno day were doing right at 275 hp...
my truck with the +100 hp predator setting did 375... so they "seemed" relatively consistent to us... curious....
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 07:30 AM
  #606  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Twin Tritons
Will an early 04 with a tuner and a late 04 with a tuner make the same amount of torque or will the late 04 always make 70 ft. lbs. less? Just wondering if the difference was in the computer or physical changes to the engine.

The tuner does not understand the delta between the two build dates… so it will not correct for the delta of TQ.

Yes, the "late" 04 will always make 70 less, if all variables remain the same. i.e. not a “special” tuner for the late 04
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 07:41 AM
  #607  
Choctaw Bob's Avatar
Choctaw Bob
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by jdadamsjr
An early 03 WITH pilot injection or one that has be detuned by the "black" flash


OBTW, the stock 6-oh's at our dyno day were doing right at 275 hp...
my truck with the +100 hp predator setting did 375... so they "seemed" relatively consistent to us... curious....
See! My hose was bleeding off quite a bit because the HP and Torque curves were flat for over 1,000 RPM. Maybe my truck had another 50-60 HP...
I plan to make another trip to the dyno after I add the water injection. I will have them run a base line before we turn on the Water/alcohol injection.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #608  
fish4bass's Avatar
fish4bass
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: TN
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
The trucks definitely have different personalities.

In fact, if you want to be technical about it...every computer code has it's own personality. Every truck has different tolerances (remember, these trucks are designed by humans and built by humans....or at least human built machines).
No two are exactly the same...I don't care what anyone says.

Sometimes tolerances add up, sometimes they don't....a few thousanths more...a few thousanths less...it all makes a difference.

Then you have calibration...this is a HUGE HUGE variable.
Each calibration is most certainly different....you can usually tell right away if Ford refashes your PCM. Sometimes this is a good change, sometimes you may not like it.
Each calibration must be tuned different than others to get the correct gains, mileage and drivability.

Because of all of these tuning differences, tuning must be done for each calibration and a generic program can not be forced into each truck. This makes constructing a database more difficult and is part of the reason why so much time is spent in R&D

Did you know a 2003 6.0L or early 04 makes nearly 70 ft lbs more torque stock than a late 04 does stock?

I haven't seen two stock trucks put down the same stock numbers yet.....and I'm using a VERY consistent Superflow dyno.
Once they reach optimal temp, one truck will make the same numbers run after run ...when you strap down another truck it all changes.
I have a March 03 Huntsville engine. Mine originally ran like a scalded dog. At about 6K miles I started getting the dreaded idle fluctuation and received the Oct flash. I lost the PI and idle fluctuation. I gained MPGs and a little power. I have not received another flash nor will I if I can help it. I have read of so many getting worse MPGs after the October flash...not me.

My point is that Vic's comment is well taken. These trucks are obviously different in many respects.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 09:41 AM
  #609  
the cleaner's Avatar
the cleaner
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 1
If my truck was updated with the DAXO flash,will it say it on the PCM.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #610  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by the cleaner
If my truck was updated with the DAXO flash,will it say it on the PCM.
Call SC and ask if it will, they will help you out.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #611  
supernewguy's Avatar
supernewguy
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
This is not an "update", it is a case to case basis as it is more a matter of preference than anything.

I will make adjustents to your shifting and shifting only.
Vic,

Just curious, how will you know how much to adjust it without my truck? All I told customer service was that it shifted kinda harsh for my liking during low speeds in Econ mode.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #612  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by supernewguy
Vic,

Just curious, how will you know how much to adjust it without my truck? All I told customer service was that it shifted kinda harsh for my liking during low speeds in Econ mode.

I can say this about the harsh shifting.
This is very personal thing one mans hard shift is another mans dream, I hope no one believes
this will continue to be a, "can you do it just a bit more"
I think this is awesome that SC is doing this for some.
However....
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #613  
softwizard's Avatar
softwizard
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mrc59
Hi Vic. My unit's on the way back -- if not already there -- for rough shifts at light throttle in economy mode.

A related issue is when I disengage the cruise control: I have a very serious "bump" all through the drive train. Will the planned tranny program tweak address this as well?

You say this change is to address a preference. With all due respect, who would want this behavior? Or, do you mean by preference, that those running in performance mode don't experience this?
Mine also shifts a little firm in both ECON and HP AND it does the bump thing coming out of cruise control.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #614  
mrc59's Avatar
mrc59
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Metro DC
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
I can say this about the harsh shifting.
This is very personal thing one mans hard shift is another mans dream, I hope no one believes
this will continue to be a, "can you do it just a bit more"
I think this is awesome that SC is doing this for some.
However....
Wait a minute... I don't want anything to do with an after market modification that may damage my truck's tranny or drivetrain. I seek a mileage improvement and I want my investment in this truck to last.

Given what I feel and hear while running under *my* current SCMT ECON setting, I believe this program is hard on *my* equipment. The mileage is worse because of higher shift points. The clunk I feel/hear when dropping off cruise cannot be good.

This isn't a preference issue, like longbed/shortbed, or cloth/leather. I chose the SCMT and ECON mode to get better economy and that's all I want. But as things stand, I get worse economy and rough shifts that must result in excess wear.

Perhaps we're not talking apples to apples here. I'll buy the point that trucks differ, and that mine is sensitive to the new program and more prone to hard shifts than other trucks. But this isn't just a preference issue. The problem is a showstopper for the SCMT. I won't use it if this can't be resolved. Thankfully, the master is willing to work on the program and I'm willing to see if a retune takes care of things.

I don't expect SC to individually tweak every truck. From what I read, that's not necessary, which is great.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #615  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mrc59
Wait a minute... I don't want anything to do with an after market modification that may damage my truck's tranny or drivetrain. I seek a mileage improvement and I want my investment in this truck to last.

Given what I feel and hear while running under *my* current SCMT ECON setting, I believe this program is hard on *my* equipment. The mileage is worse because of higher shift points. The clunk I feel/hear when dropping off cruise cannot be good.

This isn't a preference issue, like longbed/shortbed, or cloth/leather. I chose the SCMT and ECON mode to get better economy and that's all I want. But as things stand, I get worse economy and rough shifts that must result in excess wear.

Perhaps we're not talking apples to apples here. I'll buy the point that trucks differ, and that mine is sensitive to the new program and more prone to hard shifts than other trucks. But this isn't just a preference issue. The problem is a showstopper for the SCMT. I won't use it if this can't be resolved. Thankfully, the master is willing to work on the program and I'm willing to see if a retune takes care of things.

I don't expect SC to individually tweak every truck. From what I read, that's not necessary, which is great.

To each his own......this is what I wrote "This is very personal thing one mans hard shift is another mans dream" you MAY NOT like it most do, once again a personal thing......and no it will not hurt the truck.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE