When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why do we need to swap the rear Axle? I would like to know the WMS difference is anyone has it? and i see the brakes are larger..
found this- the pinion spline count is different starting in 2011. I believe axle shafts are still 35 spline though Ford 10.25" / Ford 10.5" (Sterling / Visteon) Axle Parts, Gears, and Upgrades
1983-199210.25" Short 31 Spline Pinion (1-1/4")1993-199810.25" Long 31 Spline Pinion (1-5/8")1999-200710.50" Long 31 Spline Pinion2008-2010Same as '99-'06 w/ Different Bearings2011 +10.50 w/ 37 Spline Pinion
Are you asking why the need to swap if you swap the front?
yes, thanks. From what I have read from other sources they were saying the front dana 60 (05' and later are wider) but the rear sterling axles are similar widths..... I cannot confirm this however....
I understand the rear caliper is slightly larger but any other reason to swap rear axles? Thanks
The newer axles on the 05+ are 3" wider from end-to-end...both front and rear. Hence the need for spacers if you want to run the same rims on the back as the front if you DON'T swap the back axle out with the front. You can get a Dana 60 from an 03-04 that is still leaf sprung if all you want is the 60.
Can an 05+ D60 be narrowed 3” without issue? By issue, I am mainly referring to tire/frame clearance once that axle is narrowed. I don’t know the cost, but I know it’s very common with the serious off-road crowd. Before this is dismissed as ridiculous, if one has an existing tire wheel package they really like and are then faced with purchasing a new tire/wheel package , that expense could surpass the cost of narrowing the front axle. Also consider that your existing rear axle is now fine and doesn’t need changing or spacers. I hope Pirate will chime in here.
Okay, just snooping around on the net, the job of narrowing an axle housing and repslineing the axles or even custom made to length axles looks to be pretty reasonable. Considerably less than a nice set of wheels. I am surprised nobody has gone this route. If this needs to be a separate thread then I can move it. This thread seems to be the very comprehensive front end swap guide though.
even custom made to length axles looks to be pretty reasonable. Considerably less than a nice set of wheels. I am surprised nobody has gone this route.
I've briefly considered going this route... boring out the plug welds that retain the axle tubes to the front differential casting, and replacing the tubes with longer ones, just a couple of inches longer, matching whatever was available in off the shelf axle shafts that matched my carrier's splines, in order to widen the track and increase the wheel cut clearance for a tighter turning radius, while avoiding the death wobble and inadequate caster issues prevalent in the coil sprung set ups since the whole purpose of doing it this way would be to retain the leaf spring suspension. While shaving down the stop posts of the knuckle castings for more angular cut is easy enough, the more complicated limitation lies in the universal joints nested inside the knuckles. The stock U joint crosses and axle shaft yokes are apparently not large enough to reliably handle any increase in range of articulation.
So when Dana designed the Super 60, larger yokes and larger U joints were employed inside larger knuckle castings, to accommodate the more angular wheel cut during axle rotation at 4HI speeds. That's when I realized that my experience helping a rock crawler neighbor plug weld new tubes in the pumpkin of his buddy's rear axle D60... was not enough to street cred to napkin engineer a wide track front axle on my own.
I was under the impression the rear axle width difference was in the hubs, everything else being the same. Swapping the 05-07 hubs and brakes over would be doable, but I guess that depends on if the caliper spacing is done from the mounts on the axle, or the calipers & brackets.
Well, just looking at some of the 05+ axle pics, it looks to me like narrowing them is out due to the bottom coil spring locator which would need to stay in the same place.
I was under the impression the rear axle width difference was in the hubs, everything else being the same. Swapping the 05-07 hubs and brakes over would be doable, but I guess that depends on if the caliper spacing is done from the mounts on the axle, or the calipers & brackets.
putting 99-04 hubs and brakes on a 07 axle would negate 3/5 of the benifit of using a 07+ axle.
1.bigger brakes
2. Bigger unit bearings
3. Better turning radius
4. Bigger axle shafts
5. Bigger ring and pinion
I've briefly considered going this route... boring out the plug welds that retain the axle tubes to the front differential casting, and replacing the tubes with longer ones, just a couple of inches longer, matching whatever was available in off the shelf axle shafts that matched my carrier's splines, in order to widen the track and increase the wheel cut clearance for a tighter turning radius, while avoiding the death wobble and inadequate caster issues prevalent in the coil sprung set ups since the whole purpose of doing it this way would be to retain the leaf spring suspension. While shaving down the stop posts of the knuckle castings for more angular cut is easy enough, the more complicated limitation lies in the universal joints nested inside the knuckles. The stock U joint crosses and axle shaft yokes are apparently not large enough to reliably handle any increase in range of articulation.
So when Dana designed the Super 60, larger yokes and larger U joints were employed inside larger knuckle castings, to accommodate the more angular wheel cut during axle rotation at 4HI speeds. That's when I realized that my experience helping a rock crawler neighbor plug weld new tubes in the pumpkin of his buddy's rear axle D60... was not enough to street cred to napkin engineer a wide track front axle on my own.
Rock rigs turn 1350 Size 60 ujoints to 50* on a regular basis, given the typical usage of a Ex I seriously doubt you would break a joint or yoke ears by making it turn a few degrees over stock and certainly not going to do it at 4 hi speeds, In 4low the small 30 spline shaft is far more likely to fail.
Speaking of the Dana 50, consider the smaller ring and pinion and axle shafts before you spend to much time and money on the axle. The 07 Dana 60 is a far better choice as a builder and vastly superior to the Dana 50
Well, just looking at some of the 05+ axle pics, it looks to me like narrowing them is out due to the bottom coil spring locator which would need to stay in the same place.
your whole reasons to do this was to use a rim with more backspacing which would give you some room to move the spring outboard, I bet you could squeeze it in there, if not then use a smaller OD coil spring like on a 2” coilover.
Even a simple narrow job is going to cost more then new rims so if the exercise was to save money you already lost that battle from the get go. But if the goal was to have fun making your thing work, it can
putting 99-04 hubs and brakes on a 07 axle would negate 3/5 of the benifit of using a 07+ axle.
1.bigger brakes
2. Bigger unit bearings
3. Better turning radius
4. Bigger axle shafts
5. Bigger ring and pinion
Perhaps I worded it wrong. I'm talking other way around. put the 05-07 hubs & brakes on the 01 rear I already have. Save from pulling out the entire axle. Front axle would be a full swap of course, but from what I can tell the rear upgrade should be much easier. I could be entirely wrong. Axle shafts in the 10.5 rear are the same 35 spline 37 5/8" aint they?
Speaking of the Dana 50, consider the smaller ring and pinion and axle shafts before you spend to much time and money on the axle. The 07 Dana 60 is a far better choice as a builder and vastly superior to the Dana 50
My truck came with the 6K lb rated Dana 60. I'm wanting the wheel cut and turning radius of the Super 60, without converting to coils and radius arms.