Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

2011 fuel system issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 10:41 PM
  #106  
GCLL's Avatar
GCLL
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NinerBikes
Guys, really stop the nonsense with this being a Ford problem... it isn't, it's Bosch's problem. Ford subcontracted the whole fuel system with Bosch. Bosch specs the filtering requirements, for sediment, micron size passing of debris on first pass by the fuel filter, and water and moisture containment. It's up to Ford to meet those specifications.

If water is getting through, it's on Ford.
If the fuel filter isn't filtering fine enough , it's on Ford.
If lubricity of fuel is the issue, run 50:1 or 100:1 blend of biodiesel, add a qt or two of biodiesel to every 24 gallons of fuel to get the wear scar down to under 300micron wear scar spec for your diesel fuel.

If you do the above, and your HPFP still poops the bed, like others have with the same family of pump, then the problem is not with your fuel... it's a process of elimination.
These pumps are failing in England, in Canada, and Bosch and the vehicle manufacturers are trying to keep it hush hush.
This is true, but Ford needs to take care of their customers and go after Bosch. They chose the pump now they need to stand behind it.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #107  
srkr's Avatar
srkr
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 658
Originally Posted by GCLL
This is true, but Ford needs to take care of their customers and go after Bosch. They chose the pump now they need to stand behind it.

You guys are funny.....

There is not a proven problem, a mass widespread problem.

It's too iffy to make a decision. Facts are facts.

Get off the soap boxes, please.

Shane
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #108  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GCLL
This is true, but Ford needs to take care of their customers and go after Bosch. They chose the pump now they need to stand behind it.
Kind of like how they went after Navistar? We saw how well that worked out. Ain't gonna happen, so you have to avoid the problem like The Plague.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:04 PM
  #109  
GCLL's Avatar
GCLL
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
I was hoping that Ford might have taken something good away from the International fiasco, maybe not.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:06 PM
  #110  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by srkr
You guys are funny.....

There is not a proven problem, a mass widespread problem.

It's too iffy to make a decision. Facts are facts.

Get off the soap boxes, please.

Shane
Facts are that it's gone to Design Defect Engineering at NHTSA and is under intense scrutiny by them currently, for a potential safety recall
.
It (the Bosch pump) also has been dissected to pieces by VW enthusiasts that are Mechanical Engineers by trade, even lowly diesel mechanics that specialize in diesel injection systems, and deemed by them design flaws and defective.

It's been pointed out by Delphi/Vw that the Bosch design is failure prone, Delphi designed a pump with a square bore in their DFP6, with a square shoe to house the cam follower/roller, and solve the roller alignment problem associated with a round bore that Bosch chose, and then Delphi patented the design, so Bosch no longer has that simple design option that keeps things in proper alignment, without paying royalties.

Fatal pump damage comes up from lateral rotation in the bore.

Delphi's Multec® Diesel common Rail System Helps New Volkswagen Polo BlueMotion Achieve Record Low CO2 Emissions and Fuel consumption

Them's the facts... I am certain Delphi could adapt and engineer the design to run 2 cylinders instead of 1, one for each bank of 4 cylinders and the fuel rail that feeds them.

The worst feature about the Bosch cp 4.x series pump is that it rotates at crank speed, with one crappy roller. All their other systems rotated at half crank speed, had 4 rollers on a merry go round type of cam, and were running steel on steel for fuel pump ring and vanes, as well as bore and plunger, rollers, and cam, on the VE system pumps. Pre common rail and lower fuel pressure too.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:11 PM
  #111  
srkr's Avatar
srkr
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 658
Originally Posted by GCLL
I was hoping that Ford might have taken something good away from the International fiasco, maybe not.
Really? Again?

Not a panic problem YOU are making out to be.


GMAFB.

I have to keep running behind you putting out these stupid fires!

Prove you accusations or leave the subject alone.

Shane
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:15 PM
  #112  
stsmark's Avatar
stsmark
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 60
From: Ca Wine country
Niner Bikes is right on with his assumption that a huge factor in all this is a Steel piston in an Aluminum bore, it's impossible for that combination to deal with anything but ideal lubrication. Bleeding air after a filter change will set the failure ball in motion if not done by cycling the key using the low pressure pump in the DFCM. Why is there not a steel body for this unit being tested at Bosch and FOMOCO? I suppose there could be but I doubt it. I see no option but to do a precautionary pump change after a WIF incident. The pump is the source of all the chips causing the downstream damage. 2-3000 is better than 12000.

I like my truck a lot but this is a black eye on this powertrain. Ford chose a fuel system not designed for the market they were selling the vehicle in. Spending years working with OEM aircraft manufacturer's on warranty claims I smell that Bosch told Ford about the lubricity issue and Ford rolled the dice to avoid either a delay to certify or cost difference if they asked Bosch to deliver a stronger unit. Hence Ford having to go it alone eating these claims and pushing the Insurance route down our throats. Its too bad since Ford and this product is large enough sales for Bosch to have made anything they wanted. This will get cured just not on our trucks on Fords nickel for us.

Ford if your listening if you can really fix this and price it fairly I would do it on my own nickel just so I don't have to worry out on the road with the 5th wheel stuck on the back.

Cummins uses a different series all steel version that is a different pump.

If this does blow up into a disaster I am really good pals with the lawyer who beat Wal-Mart for 172 million over lunch breaks and unpaid OT here in CA. He got paid 52 million in fees for his time as well.

Peace and good diesel be with you!
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:20 PM
  #113  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stsmark
Niner Bikes is right on with his assumption that a huge factor in all this is a Steel piston in an Aluminum bore, it's impossible for that combination to deal with anything but ideal lubrication. Bleeding air after a filter change will set the failure ball in motion if not done by cycling the key using the low pressure pump in the DFCM. Why is there not a steel body for this unit being tested at Bosch and FOMOCO? I suppose there could be but I doubt it. I see no option but to do a precautionary pump change after a WIF incident. The pump is the source of all the chips causing the downstream damage. 2-3000 is better than 12000.

I like my truck a lot but this is a black eye on this powertrain. Ford chose a fuel system not designed for the market they were selling the vehicle in. Spending years working with OEM aircraft manufacturer's on warranty claims I smell that Bosch told Ford about the lubricity issue and Ford rolled the dice to avoid either a delay to certify or cost difference if they asked Bosch to deliver a stronger unit. Hence Ford having to go it alone eating these claims and pushing the Insurance route down our throats. Its too bad since Ford and this product is large enough sales for Bosch to have made anything they wanted. This will get cured just not on our trucks on Fords nickel for us.

Ford if your listening if you can really fix this and price it fairly I would do it on my own nickel just so I don't have to worry out on the road with the 5th wheel stuck on the back.

Cummins uses a different series all steel version that is a different pump.

If this does blow up into a disaster I am really good pals with the lawyer who beat Wal-Mart for 172 million over lunch breaks and unpaid OT here in CA. He got paid 52 million in fees for his time as well.

Peace and good diesel be with you!
Right now, with FOMOCO management, ignorance is bliss... but if or when a few folks get killed in these 6.7 scorpion diesel motored vehicles, due to the motor dying with no warning, loss of control, no power steering, no brakes, all bets are off. Hopefully, before that, folks will experience failures, lose confidence and feeling safe in their vehicles, and family's safety in said vehicle, and file complaints with NHTSA, so that the squeaky wheel gets enough grease to effect some design changes.
 
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:23 PM
  #114  
srkr's Avatar
srkr
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 658
Niner, now would this not have happened in almost 2 years of hundreds and thousands of trucks on the road by now?

Shane
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:30 PM
  #115  
GCLL's Avatar
GCLL
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by srkr
Really? Again?

Not a panic problem YOU are making out to be.


GMAFB.

I have to keep running behind you putting out these stupid fires!

Prove you accusations or leave the subject alone.

Shane
5 failed pumps or 5000, they should be covered under warranty if the customer followed maintenance procedures. That's been my point the whole time.

It does make me a little uneasy that Volkswagon uses a very similar pump with a long record of failures.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:45 PM
  #116  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GCLL
5 failed pumps or 5000, they should be covered under warranty if the customer followed maintenance procedures. That's been my point the whole time.

It does make me a little uneasy that Volkswagon uses a very similar pump with a long record of failures.
If you go to this link here,

Defect Investigations Documents | Safercar.gov | NHTSA



and pull up this PDF

INRD-EA11003-45604P.pdf VW 4-20-2011, EXHIBIT TO REQUEST 4, REQUEST NUMBER FOUR DATA 1467

You can read about some of the 168 failures reported to NHTSA that they decided to investigate. Keep in mind, this was the first go round, about 2.5 years after the 2009's first came out, and only a request for the failures that were reported to NHSTA that were asked about, not the whole ball of wax, which is being requested now, as well as peer review of other diesel vehicle brands as of 10/07/11 for fuel pump system failures.
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #117  
srkr's Avatar
srkr
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 658
Originally Posted by NinerBikes
If you go to this link here,

Defect Investigations Documents | Safercar.gov | NHTSA



and pull up this PDF

INRD-EA11003-45604P.pdf VW 4-20-2011, EXHIBIT TO REQUEST 4, REQUEST NUMBER FOUR DATA 1467

You can read about some of the 168 failures reported to NHTSA that they decided to investigate. Keep in mind, this was the first go round, about 2.5 years after the 2009's first came out, and only a request for the failures that were reported to NHSTA that were asked about, not the whole ball of wax, which is being requested now, as well as peer review of other diesel vehicle brands as of 10/07/11 for fuel pump system failures.
Wonder if ford responded by December 9, 2011.

Shane
 
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 12:04 AM
  #118  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by srkr
Niner, now would this not have happened in almost 2 years of hundreds and thousands of trucks on the road by now?

Shane
There is no time limit on this, Shane, or mileage limit on it, when it gets down to $12000 repairs and the whole fuel system goes, without warranty coverage by Ford.

Frankly, you remind me of the "drive more, worry less" crowd on another website, that is until it happens to them. Then... they all sound like versions of Ricatic. I'm not one to risk taking the hit in the wallet myself, not into gambling and winning or losing. There is no "win" in this situation, if your HPFP does what it is supposed to do for 250k miles or more, without failure. There is only the down side as an owner operator of a vehicle.

I think everyone should lease their trucks from FoMoCo for 4 years, and if the HPFP dies, tell Ford to come tow the vehicle away and walk away from any more payments on the lease. Maybe then, Ford will finally "get it". One buys a new vehicle for reliability of operation for the first 100-150k miles on it. Ford has breached their contractual obligations on this one, as I see it... it's not reliable, and it's dangerous when it fails, to it's occupants and to other innocent drivers on our public roads. It's outright fraud to stick the owners insurance company for the repair, if the owner did everything right.

Ford/Bosch has brought a product into the USA that is not suitable for use on our diesel fuel. No if's, no and, no buts. Bosch has known about our fuel quality since 2003. The told ARB in CA all about it almost 10 years ago. Our
ASTM standard is 520 micron since ULSD came on the scene in 1999 in CAlif by Arco.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline...22003bosch.pdf

Also of note was that NONE of the fuel samples taken by Bosch had a problem with the amount of water in the fuel in 2002. This was California fuel, yet CA leads the way with # of HPFP failures, and VW has been quick to blame water or gas in the fuel. Maybe Bosch knows all this, because of failures experienced in Europe when major cities in Sweden came up with ULSD with 2 to 5 ppm sulfur in 1992 to prevent pollution, and pumps started croaking on the fuel?
 
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 12:12 AM
  #119  
srkr's Avatar
srkr
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 658
Originally Posted by NinerBikes
There is no time limit on this, Shane, or mileage limit on it, when it gets down to $12000 repairs and the whole fuel system goes, without warranty coverage by Ford.

Frankly, you remind me of the "drive more, worry less" crowd on another website, that is until it happens to them. Then... they all sound like versions of Ricatic. I'm not one to risk taking the hit in the wallet myself, not into gambling and winning or losing. There is no "win" in this situation, if your HPFP does what it is supposed to do for 250k miles or more, without failure. There is only the down side as an owner operator of a vehicle.

I think everyone should lease their trucks from FoMoCo for 4 years, and if the HPFP dies, tell Ford to come tow the vehicle away and walk away from any more payments on the lease. Maybe then, Ford will finally "get it". One buys a new vehicle for reliability of operation for the first 100-150k miles on it. Ford has breached their contractual obligations on this one, as I see it... it's not reliable, and it's dangerous when it fails, to it's occupants and to other innocent drivers on our public roads. It's outright fraud to stick the owners insurance company for the repair, if the owner did everything right.

Ford/Bosch has brought a product into the USA that is not suitable for use on our diesel fuel. No if's, no and, no buts. Bosch has known about our fuel quality since 2003. The told ARB in CA all about it almost 10 years ago. Our
ASTM standard is 520 micron since ULSD came on the scene in 1999 in CAlif by Arco.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline...22003bosch.pdf
I knoW you have seen this in VW. But I cannot worry about something that is not proven yet. I can't even see the smoke,,,,so I know there is no fire.

Sorry"...

Shane
 
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 01:00 AM
  #120  
NinerBikes's Avatar
NinerBikes
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by srkr
I knoW you have seen this in VW. But I cannot worry about something that is not proven yet. I can't even see the smoke,,,,so I know there is no fire.

Sorry"...

Shane

There's your trouble.... I have seen it in the Bosch family of CP 4.x HPFP's. I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE BADGE being ford, chevy, vw, Audi, BMW, MBz, what ever.

You need to forget about the tree and look at the whole damn forest.

What is it about leading horses to water, but you can't make them drink? Quit being a Ford fanboi, and look at the big picture, diesel vehicles with Bosch CP4.x family of HPFP's that fail in 2, 34, 5 years, and do the whole fuel system in.

It's all about perspective, your's is a small subset, Ford 6.7 Bosch cp4.2 powered vehicles, mine is larger, along the lines of NHTSA looking at all common rail diesel fuel pump failures by all major vehicle sellers in the USA, looking for commonality of the failures.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE