2011 fuel system issues
If water is getting through, it's on Ford.
If the fuel filter isn't filtering fine enough , it's on Ford.
If lubricity of fuel is the issue, run 50:1 or 100:1 blend of biodiesel, add a qt or two of biodiesel to every 24 gallons of fuel to get the wear scar down to under 300micron wear scar spec for your diesel fuel.
If you do the above, and your HPFP still poops the bed, like others have with the same family of pump, then the problem is not with your fuel... it's a process of elimination.
These pumps are failing in England, in Canada, and Bosch and the vehicle manufacturers are trying to keep it hush hush.
You guys are funny.....

There is not a proven problem, a mass widespread problem.
It's too iffy to make a decision. Facts are facts.
Get off the soap boxes, please.
Shane
.
It (the Bosch pump) also has been dissected to pieces by VW enthusiasts that are Mechanical Engineers by trade, even lowly diesel mechanics that specialize in diesel injection systems, and deemed by them design flaws and defective.
It's been pointed out by Delphi/Vw that the Bosch design is failure prone, Delphi designed a pump with a square bore in their DFP6, with a square shoe to house the cam follower/roller, and solve the roller alignment problem associated with a round bore that Bosch chose, and then Delphi patented the design, so Bosch no longer has that simple design option that keeps things in proper alignment, without paying royalties.
Fatal pump damage comes up from lateral rotation in the bore.
Delphi's Multec® Diesel common Rail System Helps New Volkswagen Polo BlueMotion Achieve Record Low CO2 Emissions and Fuel consumption
Them's the facts... I am certain Delphi could adapt and engineer the design to run 2 cylinders instead of 1, one for each bank of 4 cylinders and the fuel rail that feeds them.
The worst feature about the Bosch cp 4.x series pump is that it rotates at crank speed, with one crappy roller. All their other systems rotated at half crank speed, had 4 rollers on a merry go round type of cam, and were running steel on steel for fuel pump ring and vanes, as well as bore and plunger, rollers, and cam, on the VE system pumps. Pre common rail and lower fuel pressure too.
Not a panic problem YOU are making out to be.
GMAFB.

I have to keep running behind you putting out these stupid fires!
Prove you accusations or leave the subject alone.
Shane
I like my truck a lot but this is a black eye on this powertrain. Ford chose a fuel system not designed for the market they were selling the vehicle in. Spending years working with OEM aircraft manufacturer's on warranty claims I smell that Bosch told Ford about the lubricity issue and Ford rolled the dice to avoid either a delay to certify or cost difference if they asked Bosch to deliver a stronger unit. Hence Ford having to go it alone eating these claims and pushing the Insurance route down our throats. Its too bad since Ford and this product is large enough sales for Bosch to have made anything they wanted. This will get cured just not on our trucks on Fords nickel for us.
Ford if your listening if you can really fix this and price it fairly I would do it on my own nickel just so I don't have to worry out on the road with the 5th wheel stuck on the back.
Cummins uses a different series all steel version that is a different pump.
If this does blow up into a disaster I am really good pals with the lawyer who beat Wal-Mart for 172 million over lunch breaks and unpaid OT here in CA. He got paid 52 million in fees for his time as well.
Peace and good diesel be with you!
I like my truck a lot but this is a black eye on this powertrain. Ford chose a fuel system not designed for the market they were selling the vehicle in. Spending years working with OEM aircraft manufacturer's on warranty claims I smell that Bosch told Ford about the lubricity issue and Ford rolled the dice to avoid either a delay to certify or cost difference if they asked Bosch to deliver a stronger unit. Hence Ford having to go it alone eating these claims and pushing the Insurance route down our throats. Its too bad since Ford and this product is large enough sales for Bosch to have made anything they wanted. This will get cured just not on our trucks on Fords nickel for us.
Ford if your listening if you can really fix this and price it fairly I would do it on my own nickel just so I don't have to worry out on the road with the 5th wheel stuck on the back.
Cummins uses a different series all steel version that is a different pump.
If this does blow up into a disaster I am really good pals with the lawyer who beat Wal-Mart for 172 million over lunch breaks and unpaid OT here in CA. He got paid 52 million in fees for his time as well.
Peace and good diesel be with you!
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
It does make me a little uneasy that Volkswagon uses a very similar pump with a long record of failures.
Defect Investigations Documents | Safercar.gov | NHTSA
and pull up this PDF
INRD-EA11003-45604P.pdf VW 4-20-2011, EXHIBIT TO REQUEST 4, REQUEST NUMBER FOUR DATA 1467
You can read about some of the 168 failures reported to NHTSA that they decided to investigate. Keep in mind, this was the first go round, about 2.5 years after the 2009's first came out, and only a request for the failures that were reported to NHSTA that were asked about, not the whole ball of wax, which is being requested now, as well as peer review of other diesel vehicle brands as of 10/07/11 for fuel pump system failures.
Defect Investigations Documents | Safercar.gov | NHTSA
and pull up this PDF
INRD-EA11003-45604P.pdf VW 4-20-2011, EXHIBIT TO REQUEST 4, REQUEST NUMBER FOUR DATA 1467
You can read about some of the 168 failures reported to NHTSA that they decided to investigate. Keep in mind, this was the first go round, about 2.5 years after the 2009's first came out, and only a request for the failures that were reported to NHSTA that were asked about, not the whole ball of wax, which is being requested now, as well as peer review of other diesel vehicle brands as of 10/07/11 for fuel pump system failures.
Shane
Frankly, you remind me of the "drive more, worry less" crowd on another website, that is until it happens to them. Then... they all sound like versions of Ricatic. I'm not one to risk taking the hit in the wallet myself, not into gambling and winning or losing. There is no "win" in this situation, if your HPFP does what it is supposed to do for 250k miles or more, without failure. There is only the down side as an owner operator of a vehicle.
I think everyone should lease their trucks from FoMoCo for 4 years, and if the HPFP dies, tell Ford to come tow the vehicle away and walk away from any more payments on the lease. Maybe then, Ford will finally "get it". One buys a new vehicle for reliability of operation for the first 100-150k miles on it. Ford has breached their contractual obligations on this one, as I see it... it's not reliable, and it's dangerous when it fails, to it's occupants and to other innocent drivers on our public roads. It's outright fraud to stick the owners insurance company for the repair, if the owner did everything right.
Ford/Bosch has brought a product into the USA that is not suitable for use on our diesel fuel. No if's, no and, no buts. Bosch has known about our fuel quality since 2003. The told ARB in CA all about it almost 10 years ago. Our
ASTM standard is 520 micron since ULSD came on the scene in 1999 in CAlif by Arco.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline...22003bosch.pdf
Also of note was that NONE of the fuel samples taken by Bosch had a problem with the amount of water in the fuel in 2002. This was California fuel, yet CA leads the way with # of HPFP failures, and VW has been quick to blame water or gas in the fuel. Maybe Bosch knows all this, because of failures experienced in Europe when major cities in Sweden came up with ULSD with 2 to 5 ppm sulfur in 1992 to prevent pollution, and pumps started croaking on the fuel?
Frankly, you remind me of the "drive more, worry less" crowd on another website, that is until it happens to them. Then... they all sound like versions of Ricatic. I'm not one to risk taking the hit in the wallet myself, not into gambling and winning or losing. There is no "win" in this situation, if your HPFP does what it is supposed to do for 250k miles or more, without failure. There is only the down side as an owner operator of a vehicle.
I think everyone should lease their trucks from FoMoCo for 4 years, and if the HPFP dies, tell Ford to come tow the vehicle away and walk away from any more payments on the lease. Maybe then, Ford will finally "get it". One buys a new vehicle for reliability of operation for the first 100-150k miles on it. Ford has breached their contractual obligations on this one, as I see it... it's not reliable, and it's dangerous when it fails, to it's occupants and to other innocent drivers on our public roads. It's outright fraud to stick the owners insurance company for the repair, if the owner did everything right.
Ford/Bosch has brought a product into the USA that is not suitable for use on our diesel fuel. No if's, no and, no buts. Bosch has known about our fuel quality since 2003. The told ARB in CA all about it almost 10 years ago. Our
ASTM standard is 520 micron since ULSD came on the scene in 1999 in CAlif by Arco.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/gasoline...22003bosch.pdf
Sorry"...
Shane
There's your trouble.... I have seen it in the Bosch family of CP 4.x HPFP's. I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE BADGE being ford, chevy, vw, Audi, BMW, MBz, what ever.
You need to forget about the tree and look at the whole damn forest.
What is it about leading horses to water, but you can't make them drink? Quit being a Ford fanboi, and look at the big picture, diesel vehicles with Bosch CP4.x family of HPFP's that fail in 2, 34, 5 years, and do the whole fuel system in.
It's all about perspective, your's is a small subset, Ford 6.7 Bosch cp4.2 powered vehicles, mine is larger, along the lines of NHTSA looking at all common rail diesel fuel pump failures by all major vehicle sellers in the USA, looking for commonality of the failures.






