Delete or not
I must say that I removed my EGR system in a 2004 6.0 back in the day but I regret that. Deleting a highly engineered and capable system that returns 1050 fl-lbs or torque all while producing no visible smoke or odor? It's a no-brainer to keep it, AND it's against the law. Someday they will crack down on end-users, for now, it's just the illegal tuners. My advice is to get the Godzilla if you don't want to mess with DPF and DEF. That's what I am doing today!
I've always said I'm not against deleting, understand why guys do it but just can't stand the @$$ hats who roll coal on overfueling race tunes...
That said, he bought the flash tuner, 4 tunes (stock, light tow, heavy tow and performance), EGR bypass kit and exhaust with the optional muffler.
He took me for a ride and let me tell you, in the heavy tow tune, the truck IMO did not smoke visibly and was barely louder than my stock truck. The tips were darker but not black tinted and had no soot on them when I wiped my finger on the inside.
I've got no desire to delete my truck but down the line, my buddy said his tuner will do four trucks... I was impressed on how stock like sounding his truck was and no coal coming out of the tailpipe. He said he's got zero interest in running the performance tune as that's just money out the tailpipe in unspent fuel and drawing attention to yourself...
- Because it's illegal and carries of $5K fine
- You might need the emissions system intact to sell it someday
- Because it pollutes more
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I've always said I'm not against deleting, understand why guys do it but just can't stand the @$$ hats who roll coal on overfueling race tunes...
That said, he bought the flash tuner, 4 tunes (stock, light tow, heavy tow and performance), EGR bypass kit and exhaust with the optional muffler.
He took me for a ride and let me tell you, in the heavy tow tune, the truck IMO did not smoke visibly and was barely louder than my stock truck. The tips were darker but not black tinted and had no soot on them when I wiped my finger on the inside.
I've got no desire to delete my truck but down the line, my buddy said his tuner will do four trucks... I was impressed on how stock like sounding his truck was and no coal coming out of the tailpipe. He said he's got zero interest in running the performance tune as that's just money out the tailpipe in unspent fuel and drawing attention to yourself...
Reason two is not a concern because I am not selling the truck and if I perish, my older son would want it... I'm starting to put together a maintenance folder of info for him on what to do.
Also if I did delete, I would keep all emissions equipment for just such an instance. So negative on the option of selling the truck.
Number 3, while you have a point, not every owner of a deleted truck rolls coal or uses a fuel rich race tune.
The problem I have with the agenda of the EPA is that while it does look towards keeping our air and water clean, but it doesn't always work out like that (that's a whole 'nother conversation there), all these gov't clean Air agendas are based off a false narrative: climate change.
And speaking of polluting more, have you ever been behind a modern day DI gasoline powered vehicle on, say a hill, when they step on it? Number 1, there's a light puff of black that exits their exhaust. Just go look at the exhaust tips of a newer vehicle. They are black and they have soot on them that will stick to your finger if you rub your finger on the exhaust tip. Ask me how I know.
Number two, those same numerous vehicles I just mentioned, stink to the high heavens.
So while diesels are targeted by the EPA, modern gas engines are not in regards to particulate matter.
I posted up a thread here on Speed of Air Engine Technologies that have the potential to possibly shake up the world of modern day engine exhaust after treatment technologies.
Go search for those terms and you'll find more info on those pistons.
So while I've always called out the coal rollers, I'm not against responsible owners who delete with stock power tunes or tow tunes that don't smoke out the people behind them nor give us diesel truck owners a black eye.
And if you're going to pull the "pollute more" card, I have to ask: are you against pre-emissions vehicles, both gas and diesel, on the road today?
Last edited by Overkill2; Nov 18, 2023 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Correct post
Reason two is not a concern because I am not selling the truck and if I perish, my older son would want it... I'm starting to put together a maintenance folder of info for him on what to do.
Also if I did delete, I would keep all emissions equipment for just such an instance. So negative on the option of selling the truck.
Number 3, while you have a point, not every owner of a deleted truck rolls coal or uses a fuel rich race tune.
The problem I have with the agenda of the EPA is that while it does look towards keeping our air and water clean, but it doesn't always work out like that (that's a whole 'nother conversation there), all these gov't clean Air agendas are based off a false narrative: climate change.
And speaking of polluting more, have you ever been behind a modern day DI gasoline powered vehicle on, say a hill, when they step on it? Number 1, there's a light puff of black that exits their exhaust. Just go look at the exhaust tips of a newer vehicle. They are black and they have soot on them that will stick to your finger if you rub your finger on the exhaust tip. Ask me how I know.
Number two, those same numerous vehicles I just mentioned, stink to the high heavens.
So while diesels are targeted by the EPA, modern gas engines are not in regards to particulate matter.
I posted up a thread here on Speed of Air Engine Technologies that have the potential to possibly shake up the world of modern day engine exhaust after treatment technologies.
Go search for those terms and you'll find more info on those pistons.
So while I've always called out the coal rollers, I'm not against responsible owners who delete with stock power tunes or tow tunes that don't smoke out the people behind them nor give us diesel truck owners a black eye.
And if you're going to pull the "pollute more" card, I have to ask: are you against pre-emissions vehicles, both gas and diesel, on the road today?
Those are the answers.
On the other, unrelated point about SOA lean-burn technology, not sure I believe the claim. It's not like the auto manufacturers haven't spent untold billions making diesels cleaner and more efficient to meet regulatory standards.
For many, the primary driver isn't necessarily more power (although that is a very nice plus!) I think most do so because the DEF/DPF system is expensive to fix/replace and restricts how you use your vehicle, especially if your driving habits involve a fair amount of short trips or idle time. Regenerating wastes fuel and sometimes requires an unnecessary prolonged drive to complete the process
(do we have data on that environmental impact yet? lol) For that DEF heater you had fixed under warranty the first time....who gets the bill on the next one? For some, watching DEF levels is just another thing to think about. When the DPF reaches the end of its life expectancy or clogs, here comes a bill to face and it wont be small.
So although this topic seems to bring out the extremes of either position, somewhere is the middle is the common sense solution. But if you're going to use your truck as a daily driver and plan on keeping it for more than 5 years, deleting seems to make the most sense.
Those are the answers.
On the other, unrelated point about SOA lean-burn technology, not sure I believe the claim. It's not like the auto manufacturers haven't spent untold billions making diesels cleaner and more efficient to meet regulatory standards.
But when it comes to emissions on 6.7s, there are more than a few that do have issues that have not been resolved by a dealer that either sell the truck back or just delete because the problems could not be resolved.
Ford's emissions components do function well but they are not perfect and the technology still has to advance...
As to SOA pistons, I'd thought I'd throw it out there because if they are proven to work, it would negate emissions components on modern diesels. OEMs would be hesitant because they are so vested in time and money with the traditional methods of after exhaust methods of meeting federal emissions guidelines. They are looking for CARB certification.
Truthfully, mixing crankcase ventilation gases/oil/etc. with EGR gases into the intake is not the cleanest method as the intake manifold crudes with crap which collects in the intake... but they don't care about engine longevity because they have to sell the latest and greatest diesels to make bank.
But that's why I run a Mishimoto oil catch can... To try to keep my intake cleaner. I'm also open to installing a methanol injection system as I hear they do wonders for emissions and give you a boost in mileage as well another benefit; more power.
I'm not trying to argue with you as I'm not pro-delete nor am I anti-delete... To each their own I say. Time will tell whether I go down that road or not but right now... I'm not having any issues as I get my truck hot enough to keep the emissions happy and functioning...













