When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I wonder which pump provides the needed volume with the least amount of air? My thought is if it’s not working as hard then there may be less cavitation.
I wonder which pump provides the needed volume with the least amount of air? My thought is if it’s not working as hard then there may be less cavitation.
I doubt work would want me to take our FFT equipment offsite for a test on a 21 year old Powerstroke.
What are your thoughts?
would a thinner but wider pocket on the pump gear cause more or less of a tendency for aeration?
I’m assuming the gear tooth itself has became a smaller width so the same volume can be pumped at each rpm.
I doubt work would want me to take our FFT equipment offsite for a test on a 21 year old Powerstroke.
What are your thoughts?
would a thinner but wider pocket on the pump gear cause more or less of a tendency for aeration?
I’m assuming the gear tooth itself has became a smaller width so the same volume can be pumped at each rpm.
No clue without data to tell me how hard the pump is sucking the oil out of the pan. The critical measure is if oil is getting sucked so hard that it drops below vapor pressure. That is when cavitation occurs.
If you have fewer lobes with deeper pockets, I'm assuming there will be greater suction within the pumping chamber vs more lobes with more shallow pockets. But I'm sure there's plenty of nuance that'd be needed for a proper understanding.
Originally Posted by FordTruckNoob
This kind of overdid it?
Definitely the latter haha the former is for Fridays and Saturdays