Big Blue
)Yes, I could do that. I'll be powder-coating about 6 other things then anyway as I'm going to do away with the red. So, I could easily PC them. However, both of them have attaching points on them that I don't need/want, and at least the passenger's side one has seen better days. Here's a shot with a spotlight showing up the dents, which would be made much more visible if the covers were a shiny finish than the current dull gray.
I think for $60 the Eddys would look a lot better. But, what say all y'all?

Then I looked a bit further and found this, still on the same perch.
So, there are 3 bolts where there should be 5. But two of them are G8's and one is sorta a G5 - but with a spacer that may be thin-wall tubing. And, as Jim pointed out, there are no washers. In fact, on the first picture you can see where the head of what was probably a rivet set for years against the perch. Given that, there's certainly less than 1/2 of the clamping force the factory thought the perch needed. Oh well, I can easily fix that with the engine out.
And, by the way, at the top of the pic above you can easily see two other problems that I've shown previously. First, the two pieces of tubing that appear to be almost touching the header are the fuel lines. But, the pic is deceptive as there's about 1/2" of clearance.

Second, just left of the "knee" of the closer of the two fuel lines is where the header is against the perch.
But - it's your truck, so do what you think is best. The Eddys are cheap enough for sure.

So, that would mean I'll have a black base and aluminum top, and could carry that theme over to the valve covers. One approach would be to do the base of the air cleaner in black wrinkle and have matching valve covers. But, I'll have to learn how to do wrinkly powder coating.
Or, I could do smooth black on both and sand the top of Ford Motorsports like I did for Dad's. Hmmm. You guys are helping. Thanks!
Valve covers do not look like the correct ones, they should have a place to attach the air pipes for the exhaust.
Note studs on valve cover to stabilize the air manifold and air plumbing.
Bill - I suspect these are salvage yard purchases since they have "460" written on them with a paint pen. I'm not sure why the change, but there's a picture somewhere of the engine on a stand with "fabricated" valve covers. Perhaps they were too tall and wouldn't fit under the A/C compressor? Given that, I should check out the clearance before deciding what covers to order.
As for the perches, I don't think I need pictures, but thanks. These are in the right places, but just don't have all the fasteners they are supposed to have. So, with the engine out I'll pull the perches, blast and and powder coat them, and put them back with G8 fasteners, washers, etc.
Speaking of that, do y'all think that placing a 1/4" plate on top of both perches would be the way to get clearance for the headers? As Bill pointed out, because of the angle I won't get but about 1/8" of additional height, but I can also dent the header at that point. Will that be enough?
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I do agree that properly bolting them may help with the engine 'listing'.
Given the current metric bolts, reaming to fractional holes should tighten things up considerably.
Not sure how the geometry of spacers would affect the ability of the motor mounts to fit in the perches at all
And, while I'm measuring I think I'll also measure the width between the perches and their angle(s), and draw it up on CAD. That way I can figure out what will happen with spacers.
But, I hadn't thought about the perch sagging. Good point. The two bolts that are missing are the ones that would pull the perch up tight to the crossmember, so without them it has to be drooping some. I suppose I could loosen the retaining nuts, raise the engine slightly to take the load off the perch, slip bolts in those holes, and cinch it up tight to see what happens. But, that sounds like work, and I doubt it will raise it enough to get the clearance needed, so I think that will just be icing on the cake.
If not, I still have the one I took off Darth.
I'd imagine the diagonal of your 1/4" plate is going to be almost 3/8.
Hypotenuse of a square is 1.4142, so if the face is 45°......
This is simply the reverse of milling an intake when you deck the heads.
Jim - You are right. I was thinking the wrong-way 'round. Turns out that a .250" spacer gives .350" lift, as shown below. (Actually it should be .3535" if you multiply the square-root of 2 times .250, but my drawing wasn't quite that accurate.) So, a .1875" (3/16") spacer will give .265" lift.
Does that seem like it would be enough? Hope so because I have about .200+" of mount stud sticking out past the nut. And, by the way, it looks like the mount studs are close to the bottom of the teardrop-shaped slots, so they can easily go up. See the pic at the bottom.
I'm going to assume the shape of the hole is to make it easier to drop the engine in... from about 8'

Then accurately locate it as the mounts bottom and wedge under the weight
If you were to shim only one side you would get rotation -and- lift, but again don't know if that would be helpful.
Depending on where the header is hitting relative to the mounting axis on the opposite side and the distance between perches, 1/4" lift on the problematic side might equate to 3/8" or more at the collector.








