When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Direct injection plays a big role in cold starting as well.
I understood that to be a given, my point was a cummins will start alot easier than a PSD or a dmax as well. Beyond that our equiptment (tractors and semis) will start when its -20 as long as the fuel isnt gelled.
My '94 will start @ -25F. I don't really see the need for an intake heater. If all the parts of the system are working together 100% it is my opinion that they will probably always start as long as the fuel is liquid.
-Batteries
-Battery terminal connections
-Battery cables
-Starter
-Glow plugs
-Glow plug controller
-Glow plug wiring
-Compression
As long as all these are tip top, I personally don't have any trouble in the cold.
My '94 will start @ -25F. I don't really see the need for an intake heater. If all the parts of the system are working together 100% it is my opinion that they will probably always start as long as the fuel is liquid.
-Batteries
-Battery terminal connections
-Battery cables
-Starter
-Glow plugs
-Glow plug controller
-Glow plug wiring
-Compression
As long as all these are tip top, I personally don't have any trouble in the cold.
Your 94 will start in -25 with no glow plugs..? I call BS
IMO the intake heater is better than GPs because there is only one and it heats the whole intake not just the cylinder... well pre-cup in fact.
He did not say without glow plugs. Mine has started @ -10 without a block heater; the gp's ran for about 18 seconds before the wts light went out though.
Well it's official, I've put about a thousand miles on the new motor, can't take it anymore and broke down. Ordered an s366 today, gauges, some more sch. 40 for manifolds, tracked down a zf6 and t case for $1300(found one for $650 for both but obviously was sold before I could get it) and in the next two weeks when parts are coming it's going back under the knife. This time for good(haha yeah right).
Awesome. I look forward to seeing how the s366 does for you? What IP are you running right now? And you are running the R&D Stage1 cam correct?
Right now I am just running a dps turbo cal, hoping to get my hands on something a little more in the 180 range. Yes I am running the stage 1 but also have .040 off the pistons.
Right now I am just running a dps turbo cal, hoping to get my hands on something a little more in the 180 range. Yes I am running the stage 1 but also have .040 off the pistons.
Nice. It should make some power when all is said and done. I know it is NA still but how is the power with it NA and that much lower compression from the pistons and cam? Probably slightly more sluggish I would assume. I'm sure the turbo will liven it up though. I'm pretty stoked to see the s366 on your setup with more fuel. Nobody has run a turbo that big with that much fuel before.
Nice. It should make some power when all is said and done. I know it is NA still but how is the power with it NA and that much lower compression from the pistons and cam? Probably slightly more sluggish I would assume. I'm sure the turbo will liven it up though. I'm pretty stoked to see the s366 on your setup with more fuel. Nobody has run a turbo that big with that much fuel before.
Honestly, I can't tell any difference performance wise with lowered compression and cam. Same 0-60 times actually. It did seem to clean the fuel up much better, but didn't seem anymore powerful.
I am looking forward to the turbo and fuel, pulled 20,000 today and it just needs more to be able to do it efficiently. As far as the fuel is concerned, that could take some time before I could get my hands on something with 180ccs.
Just a non-idi smart question, but doesn't the injector spray inside the combustion chamber?
So if you cut back compression, is it going to burn it as efficiently?
I mean, is the combustion gonna have trouble getting into the rest of the compressed air that isn't in the combustion chambeR?
Just a non-idi smart question, but doesn't the injector spray inside the combustion chamber
Technically no. That's the indirect injection part. Less compression does however mean lower efficiency, I feel that I mostly could not tell a difference from the original engine because the original engine was utterly shot.
Decompressing the engine allows for more aggressive turbo pressure. When you turbo charge the engine you increase compression by forcing air into the cylinder before it compresses the air. Adding a turbo to a High compression diesel engine Like the IDI you create to much supper heated air pre combustion and this makes for High EGT's at lower fuel levels before you add more fuel to increase power. Balancing the compression to the turbo makes for better performing engine at higher power (Fuel) levels.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.