Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Project TGM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #121  
Encho's Avatar
Encho
The Southernmost Mod
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,902
Likes: 20
From: Caracas, Venezuela
Club FTE Gold Member
If you do some of the mods in the article i posted (i would be amazed if i could get such performance out of my engine for that amount of $$$) you will be at around 12mpg or more, I'm pretty sure of that. The engine will be at it sweet spot way lower in the RPM range hence you won't be steping on it. I would specially consider a proper timing chain since the original ones have retarded timing for smog reasons and that's what really kill these engine's performance.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2012 | 05:34 PM
  #122  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
Though i would love to do all of that, i unfortunately can't... I don't really have the funds. Eventually i want to have the motor completely rebuilt and upgraded but that will be a while down the road.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2012 | 05:36 PM
  #123  
ErrorS's Avatar
ErrorS
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
carbs are so easy man, try rebuilding one, after you're done you'll know everything you need to about how it works to get it tuned right!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #124  
ErrorS's Avatar
ErrorS
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Encho
If you do some of the mods in the article i posted (i would be amazed if i could get such performance out of my engine for that amount of $$$) you will be at around 12mpg or more, I'm pretty sure of that. The engine will be at it sweet spot way lower in the RPM range hence you won't be steping on it. I would specially consider a proper timing chain since the original ones have retarded timing for smog reasons and that's what really kill these engine's performance.
Encho, I really think that was to improve torque in low, low low RPM range in expense for higher RPM horsepower loss. If you punch the numbers you gain like 4-8 ft' lbs in the low RPM range theoretically for a loss of about 10-20hp in the 2500+ range for retarding the chain.. again, this was apparently to improve MPG slightly for truck-like situations.
Doesn't help a ton with a 70mph interstate speed running, what, 2500RPMs with no overdrive? but for city driving and old speed limits it was ideal.

I wish I had all my white papers on this stuff.. I know TGM isn't ready for a $10,000 dream rebuild, but still, there's a lot of really cool stuff about the 400s most people don't know
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #125  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
So i decided to finally clean up my tans fluid mess from the rebuild... That was the easy stuff. I also went to check out why neither my stock or aftermarket temp gauge are no longer working. Now the aftermarket has a wire type thing inside of a long spring insulator that runs to what i assume is the thermo housing. Then i have another doohicky where the top hose sits on the block...
This is the doohicky on the top, there is a plug like thing in the picture that looks like it could have come off there and i think it ties into the wiring harness. Could this be for the OEM temp gauge?

This is the aftermarket wire thing with the spring insulator thing to. It goes form there all the way to the gauge itself, i don't know if that is the stock placement for the gauge wire or is this is all bullwacky but i wouldn't mind some assistance.


Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #126  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
Well guys the tally has been counted, looks like we were all off by quite a lot...

Red box total mpg. This pretty much makes me think that if i were to drive like i was trying to conserve fuel i might get about 5 1/2 or so. The way i got that was taking the top number subtracted by the middle number which got 34 then took 34 and divided it by the gallons from today to top it off, 7.740 and got that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2012 | 09:24 PM
  #127  
Encho's Avatar
Encho
The Southernmost Mod
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,902
Likes: 20
From: Caracas, Venezuela
Club FTE Gold Member
If you didn't top the tank the first time you filled up that measure won't be accurate, i explained it with an example on another thread you posted this info. That's some very lousy mileage, you should be seeing at least 9-10 MPG.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2012 | 09:33 PM
  #128  
ErrorS's Avatar
ErrorS
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
I thought I posted? whatever.. yeah man, I couldn't have got 5mpg in my truck with the 400 if I had tried. It's either crazy inaccurate, or you have something set wrong (accelerator pump man, accelerator pump!)
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 21, 2012 | 04:56 AM
  #129  
justin Wallace's Avatar
justin Wallace
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, TX
Did you get the mileage from your odometer? If so, the 35" tires will be telling you that you didn't go as far. (less mileage)

By the way, I am going to subscribe to your thread. I'm in the process of doing my 78 rebuild. I am very interested to see your rig grow!
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2012 | 11:27 PM
  #130  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
Originally Posted by Encho
If you didn't top the tank the first time you filled up that measure won't be accurate, i explained it with an example on another thread you posted this info. That's some very lousy mileage, you should be seeing at least 9-10 MPG.
Yes you did post and i read it, i doubt though i could get 9-10 with my setup.
Originally Posted by ErrorS
I thought I posted? whatever.. yeah man, I couldn't have got 5mpg in my truck with the 400 if I had tried. It's either crazy inaccurate, or you have something set wrong (accelerator pump man, accelerator pump!)
You did as well post and i did as well read it. Once again though i dunno what or where the accelerator pump is.

Originally Posted by justin Wallace
Did you get the mileage from your odometer? If so, the 35" tires will be telling you that you didn't go as far. (less mileage)

By the way, I am going to subscribe to your thread. I'm in the process of doing my 78 rebuild. I am very interested to see your rig grow!
Thanks for the subbing i will do the same if you have a build thread. My thread moves slow and usually contains small things like cleaning or wiring or something. I haven't done too much big things yet save for the tranny rebuild and the track bar.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 01:39 AM
  #131  
justin Wallace's Avatar
justin Wallace
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, TX
Here you go Gruesome:

I decided to start a build thread. I think this link will work:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post11607311
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #132  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
Alright, thanks Justin i got it subbed. You should also add it to your sig so people will be able to find it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #133  
ErrorS's Avatar
ErrorS
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
no, not complaining you didn't reply.. I had posted something and it disappeared!

The accelerator pump is on the front of your carb, there is a linkage on it. Every time you hit your throttle it squirts a bit of gas directly into the bores. The linkage can be adjusted to lean it or enrich it.

http://www.ponycarburetors.com/images/location2.jpg

it'll look something like this.

and just an FYI, the Motorcraft, what, 2400? I forget exactly.. but the carb you have on there if stock is a great carb.

edit: ahh I remember, the 2150.. I had the 2100 on mine. The choke can be retarded sometimes, but man are they a joy to work on!
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2012 | 12:43 AM
  #134  
GruesomeJeans's Avatar
GruesomeJeans
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 1
From: Algona, Washington
As far as i know it is stock. I think it might be the 2100 but i don't know how to verify. I also did figure out what the acc pump was but i haven't looked at adjusting it yet. Are they easy to rebuild? Would i need any special tools and is there anything i need to watch out for when doing this? Also do you think the accelerator pump would come with a rebuild kit?
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2012 | 06:58 AM
  #135  
Edgethis's Avatar
Edgethis
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,804
Likes: 703
From: Tobyhanma, PA
Rebuild kits are super cheap. Heck even the Edelbrock rebuild kit is only like $30-$35. If you plan on a new 4 bbl intake like the Performer 400 (i had one) then I wouldn't bother rebuilding your current carb. Tho it would make for good practice if you buy a used 4 bbl...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE