When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Diesel trucks are so fun to drive its too bad they have become so complicated and EPA restricted. I got so close to buying a 6.7 but the fear of unlikely but very possible high dollar repairs kept me away, for now.
Anyone else find it ironic that Ford produces a "contamination kit" instead of solving the fuel pump problem? Calling it a "contamination kit" is just Ford's first strike at denying warranty coverage. Isn't a "contamination kit" also used to repair the damage done by a faulty fuel pump where no contamination was present?
Great observation.
The PowerlessStroke is a Ford cash cow.
First they charge $10k more for it, then they charge another $8-12k to fix it, every time it fails.
That’s genius.
And the funniest thing is, they can’t build the trucks or the contamination kits fast enough to keep up with demand!😂
100% agreed! I am not putting none of that crap on mine!, all gimmicks, i have seen one mechanic talk about how it doesn't always work in a major failure.
Also, bill at powerstroke help hits in this aftermarket crap, he said 9 times out of 10 it fixes one issue and opens up 99 other issues. The guy does it everyday, services 1,000s of trucks, he says always go with OEM!!
I know I am gonna get alot of crap from this, but SPE puts what? Maybe $1 million into R&D, (giving benefit of doubt), ford spends millions and millions, and innovates from previous years. Guarantee you failure rates are less then 1% of all super duties sold, just somebody has to get the bad one.
my 22 f450 is getting ripped apart as we speak (in peices) getting upper pan done, seems to be a fluke, somebody has to get a bad one. all mine stuff stays stock, when warranty goes it goes!
S&S DPK is the way to go. Go ahead and call it a gimmick but it works, period. OP would just be replacing his pump instead of the entire fuel system if he was running one.
Curious how many with failures are running aftermarket or Amazon "Motorcraft" filters. Not pointing fingers or trying to shame anyone, just truly curious.
Curious how many with failures are running aftermarket or Amazon "Motorcraft" filters. Not pointing fingers or trying to shame anyone, just truly curious.
Not mine. Every single service action was handled by my dealership. Also, nothing in the mounds of external research has ever pointed a finger at filters. Go read the report in my first link....
Not mine. Every single service action was handled by my dealership. Also, nothing in the mounds of external research has ever pointed a finger at filters. Go read the report in my first link....
As stated, not knocking anyone. The report did state "changing fuel filters ahead of schedule and use severe duty schedule". In my neck of the woods, the only failures seem to come from pumping DEF in the fuel, and that comes from all 3 brands, well except GM lift the hood to fill.
Curious how many with failures are running aftermarket or Amazon "Motorcraft" filters. Not pointing fingers or trying to shame anyone, just truly curious.
It might be a valid point. I have seen online examples of Chinese fake Motorcraft parts getting into dealer stock.
OMG. Distract from the real issue that the CP4 is a piece of junk and Ford continues to use it. Is the "moderator" paid by Ford Corporate maybe?
Hey bud, I know how frustrating this ordeal is, going through this same thing on my truck right now, but you need to cool it a little, trash talking a moderator on here is a good way to get banned.
It really doesn't surprise me. How many trucks have been built with the CP4? Thousands, hundreds of thousands? How many failures? One here, one there and then hundreds? To the bean counters it is a good return on the purchase of the part vs failures of the part. We know that is BS but that is all Ford is looking at, is it cost effective and is there a class action suit or enough failures to support a class action suit? At Ford they really could care less as long as it is cost effective vs failure rate. There is my internet 2 cents worth of opinion today.
bob
by far the most widely used diesel Fuel Injection pump in history.
It really doesn't surprise me. How many trucks have been built with the CP4? Thousands, hundreds of thousands? How many failures? One here, one there and then hundreds? To the bean counters it is a good return on the purchase of the part vs failures of the part. We know that is BS but that is all Ford is looking at, is it cost effective and is there a class action suit or enough failures to support a class action suit? At Ford they really could care less as long as it is cost effective vs failure rate. There is my internet 2 cents worth of opinion today.
bob
The Ford Pinto is a great example of this. Ford knew that it could burst into flames if rear ended. But it was cheaper to payoff the victims then repair the problem.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.