Notices
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #196  
Enomra's Avatar
Enomra
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
I keep hearing this!!!! "wait until they are broke in and then they will get better mileage" I'm not totaly disagreeing with that but I have bought 7 brand new trucks over the last 20 years and at the most I saw a 1-1.5 mileage increase over new. I attribute that to the fact that once the newness wears off you drive them differently. I'm not buying that these new engines will get a significant mileage increase when "broke in". If someone has proof otherwise please post it... I had a 2003 6.0 and I got better mileage when it was new 19-21 mpg on the hwy than when it was "broke in" 17-18mpg. I attribute that to the reflashing from stock. My new 6.0 has only 6300 miles on it and I see from 17-19mpg hwy and I don't expect to get more when it's "broke in" I think that with the new technologies that the engine builders are using today the engines don't improve as much as they did in the past....

Than again I could be wrong but please prove it...
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #197  
dieseldrinker's Avatar
dieseldrinker
New User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Angry

I agree they have way more power now and in return less gas milage but that is what they say !!
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #198  
blown65stang's Avatar
blown65stang
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mattebury
I think that a 30% increase is a bit high, I'd want independent proof.
I actually think its possible, definitely on the highway at 70-75mph when your turning 2700 rpms. Problem is, I dont drive at 70-75 that ofter so the payback on 70/30 city/highway just wont pay out for quite some time.

That being said, even if it took 5 yrs to recoup the cost of the unit, the wear on the motor at 2700 vs the lowered rpm on those trips would add up IMO. So whos going to be the first F450 4.88 truck to make the jump. LOL
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 07:39 PM
  #199  
Strut61's Avatar
Strut61
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
From: Columbia County. Pa
Well I have no new report for mileage, still averaging 11.5 per fill up. I did however get my 5th wheel hitch installed and towed for the 1st time..........

I only was able to tow about 15 miles to the Rv dealer for an inspection, but here are some first impressions....

***1st off the truck had no idea the 5er was even attached, might have gotten 1" sag when the weight was applied. Obviously, 2200# vs 6100# capacity!
***Took it down rural roads, never towed with a dually so the experience was certainly a treat, no lateral movement in the truck at all, very firm and sure handling.
***Tow boss, Ok! Went down a fairly steep hill, tap the brake and it's like a Jake brake....very nice! But, acted like it didn't want to shift up with out coaxing???? Gonna have to get used to this, not sure I like it at this point. Probably just my ignorance.
***The Brakes on this truck are the best ever! Totally solid.
*** Power house??? Even with the 4:88's and a 15k 5th wheel, well let's just say it did ok but didn't seem to have any more power than my prior 7.3, sort of disappointed really.
***The lie-o-meter never topped 7.4 mpg during the brief haul.
***Low interior cab noise, even when your trying to put your right foot through the floor!
***Did I say the brake are awesome, well they are.
*** The vote is out, I need more testing. Currently over all I like the truck but I think if my 99 F250 with the 7.3 would have had dual rear wheels, it would have done equaly as well towing. I already know I used to avg 10-12 mpg towing this very same 5er so I'm not impressed with the potential of getting only 8 to 10 mpg. The only thing that really stands out for me are the brakes. Everything else I'll reserve a final opinion on till I can tow for at least 100 miles roung trip (which will be Mat 17th).

Sorry guys, not bashing as I too own one! Just not blown away like I though I'd be.
 

Last edited by Strut61; Apr 20, 2007 at 07:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #200  
Percys Armory's Avatar
Percys Armory
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
I like not picking up speed down a steep hill and not needing to hit the brakes
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #201  
mattebury's Avatar
mattebury
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Percys Armory
I like not picking up speed down a steep hill and not needing to hit the brakes
I love the engine braking too. Headed west on I-40 coming down the grade from Kingman, AZ was great. Cruise control makes this even better. I had the cruise set at 60 for fuel economy and coming down a 6% grade for ~7 - 10 miles, cruise control applied the engine brake and I never went above 60 MPH, then at the bottom, automatically took off the engine brake and kept on plugging away at 60.

Now if I could get automatic steering, I could take a nap!
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #202  
pilotshot's Avatar
pilotshot
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pilotshot
Just finished a trip to CA and back to BC and wish to share my fuel mileages.

I have a 2008 F-350 PSD Lariat SC, 4x4, auto, 3:73 rear and SW with 18" rims. I was towing a 26 foot 26/31 Glendale Titanium 5th wheel weighing 10,600 pounds. I drove the speed limits and trip included mountains and hills on I-5 and costal highway 101.

I towed the trailer for 2468 miles/3972 Kms and the fuel mileage was 9.34 US MPG, 11.21 Imperial MPG or 25.19 Litres/100 Kms. I operated the truck empty for 808 miles/1301 Kms and the fuel mileage was 12.79 US MPG, 15.36 Imperial MPG or 18.39 Litres/100 Kms. The truck now has 5273 Kms/3276 miles with no problems to date.
A Futher Update on my Fuel Mileage. Truck now has 6000 Kms/3728 miles with no problems to date. I operated truck empty during this period with some mountain climb, city and freeway driving. Fuel mileage has increased to 14.08 US MPG, 16.7 L/100 Kms / 16.91 Imperial MPG. The truck does not feel as stiff anymore and has definitely had an increase in fuel mileage. I have a two week trailer trip to WA and OR last half of May and will report the MPG after.

While in the Ford dealership today learned a fellow had 3 miles on his new GT-40 when he totalled it at an intersection with a caddie who busted a red light. His new GT-40 arrived today. It is in the LeMans blue, orange and white. Insurance was for a new vechicle replacement in case of a total. Lucky fellow.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #203  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kimminau2
I think the idea is to have it in the peak torque rpm range while hwy cruising at 70-75. Not below the peak rpm. At 70-75 you are looking at 2600-2900 rpm. Peak torque is somewhere around 2000. If you could cruise at 70-75 at 2000 rpm you would get better mpg and driveability should be better.
The preferred (by many) method for gearing a truck is to cruise at an engine speed above the peak torque rpm, that way when you hit the hills or a headwind and the truck slows, as the rpms drop your torque is increasing which cuts down on the downshifting.
If mpg was better and driveability improved by gearing a Ford Super Duty to cruise 70-75 mph at 2,000 rpm, Ford would build them that way.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #204  
Swift193's Avatar
Swift193
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, Md
Originally Posted by origcharger
The preferred (by many) method for gearing a truck is to cruise at an engine speed above the peak torque rpm, that way when you hit the hills or a headwind and the truck slows, as the rpms drop your torque is increasing which cuts down on the downshifting.
Originally Posted by origcharger
If mpg was better and driveability improved by gearing a Ford Super Duty to cruise 70-75 mph at 2,000 rpm, Ford would build them that way.


That's exactly how my F250 Lariat is. At 75 it's just above 2000 with the 3.73's. I now have about 1700 miles on it and the 3rd trip back home from Hagerstown showed me 19.6 on the computer. The previous 2 trips I could not get it above 17.8 no matter what I did. (so far the comp. has been very close to calculations) I tow infrequently with a <10,000-lb trailer and don't have a 5'er yet. It has to work a little harder when it is towing than you guys with the big gears, but that's OK. And our "mountains" around here aren't that big anyway. I love it on the road unbridled and the milage is coming along great. I previously had a 1987 jeep cherokee which I bought new and drove for 20 years (170,000-mi). I never saw better that 23.5-mpg and that was staying below 65. At the speeds I usually traveled (70 - 80) I got 20-21 and with the trailer it was down aroung 15. Who could complain about my psd. I know it's not close to broke in yet, and I love it. The thing that really amazed me was how much sitting at stop lights and idling tears up the fuel mileage, you can watch it go down. Never thought about that until the computer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 06:12 AM
  #205  
firehawk198's Avatar
firehawk198
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Central Massachusetts
Strut, did you notice how much higher rpm it ran in tow mode, wondering if that killed the fuel milage? Your Creek is probably about 15,000# loaded? I've driven manuals for 40 years. I read a lot of good things about the Torqshift so I went that route. Still wonder if I am going to miss controlling rpm's myself. Wasn't planning to tow untill Memorial Day. I sure hope I find a big difference in towing. my v10 3.73's was rated at 9800# and my 5'th w. is 13,000. We have a hill leaving the house that I couldn't get out of 2'nd gear at 30mph. Remember your 250 7.3 sw was a lot lighter than your new 450. So we have to pay extra to have that big bad 450. a 250 regular cab 6.4 is only about 6,000# and the 450 is 8700#. So we are hauling around an extra 2700# to start with, and the 250 you can get with 3.73's so it will run a lot lower rpms than my 4.30 and your 4.88. The 450 is King of the Road but we have to pay that extra especially with the 24,000# towing capacity of your beast. Hope this makes you feeel better. Still think you will have a grin ear to ear when you pull into the campgrounds and people say, Wow that guys got one of those new 450's!
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #206  
Strut61's Avatar
Strut61
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
From: Columbia County. Pa
firehawk, I'm sure (Hoping) its a matter of getting used to it........not really thrilled with any of it at this point. I took the 5er down a very harsh incline about 3/4 miles long and the truck would still be screaming if I had let it. Then it acted like it didn't want to release from the lower gear once on the flat. I had to apply a good amount of throttle just to get it to shift.
Oh not to mention, going UP the hill. I had it in tow/haul (First time) and I was pushing floor boards......this thing with 4:88's topped the hill at the exact same speed my 99 F250 did with 3:73's. WTF!
This truck is beautiful, runs well and that is it! Seriously not happy at this point.
Right now I'd gladly get rid of it for my old truck. Besides that I got 15-17mpg running empty and 10-12 towing the same 5er.
All I have now is a slower dually Diesel HOG that looks awesome, it's kind of like a beautiful woman ya can't stand to be around!! Very frustrated here guys! Geez I hope it's just first impressions, If it's not I'll have a friggin For Sale sign!
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #207  
Percys Armory's Avatar
Percys Armory
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
should've got a Chevy
Originally Posted by Strut61
firehawk, I'm sure (Hoping) its a matter of getting used to it........not really thrilled with any of it at this point. I took the 5er down a very harsh incline about 3/4 miles long and the truck would still be screaming if I had let it. Then it acted like it didn't want to release from the lower gear once on the flat. I had to apply a good amount of throttle just to get it to shift.
Oh not to mention, going UP the hill. I had it in tow/haul (First time) and I was pushing floor boards......this thing with 4:88's topped the hill at the exact same speed my 99 F250 did with 3:73's. WTF!
This truck is beautiful, runs well and that is it! Seriously not happy at this point.
Right now I'd gladly get rid of it for my old truck. Besides that I got 15-17mpg running empty and 10-12 towing the same 5er.
All I have now is a slower dually Diesel HOG that looks awesome, it's kind of like a beautiful woman ya can't stand to be around!! Very frustrated here guys! Geez I hope it's just first impressions, If it's not I'll have a friggin For Sale sign!
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 04:34 AM
  #208  
Strut61's Avatar
Strut61
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
From: Columbia County. Pa
Naaaaa, A GMC there better!
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #209  
firehawk198's Avatar
firehawk198
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Central Massachusetts
Strut, been thinking about the towing while I ran 6 miles this morning. I think, not able to back it up but? When you mentioned that your speed was the same at the top of the hill as your 7.3, I think your 7.3 was at the proper torque rpm verses your 450 with 4.88’s was probably over reving. Example in Mass. On Rt 90 in the Berkshires they call it Blanford mtn. Going up it with my 99 v10 3.73 5 speed stick I ran it 55 mph 3rd gear 3700rpms full throttle. Your 7.3 would probably run 4th gear (if 5 speed) 2300 rpms 2/3 throttle. My new 450 4.30’s should run it 55 mph in 4th at 2600 rpms ½ throttle. Your 450 with 4.88s in 4th at 55 would be probably reving 2900 rpms being out of the torque range. Now change the weight from 13,000# towing to 24,000# my old v10 and your 7.3 would probably be down to second gear pulling their hearts out. My 450 would be down to 3rd gear 40mph at 3000 rpms. And your 450 would still be at 55 in 4th at 2900 rpms pulling just fine. So what I am trying to say, under certain circumstances towing 13-15,000# will be different at certain hills with each setup. Hope this makes you feel better. Just the 4.88 pulling 15,000 might be a bit of an overkill. You might have to go out and buy one of those Tenton homes that weigh over 20,000# to feel the real difference. Give it some more time buddy before you get discouraged.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #210  
Strut61's Avatar
Strut61
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
From: Columbia County. Pa
That is exactly why the 450 and 4:88's.......we're looking at a Teton to replace the Creek in a 4-5 year time frame.
I understand what you your saying, still frustrating though.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE