When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Torque numbers are on the chart by Ford, if you don't like it, take it up with them.
My MPG numbers are what I calculated. There seems to be nothing others can say that you won't dispute if it doesn't align with your personal experience, whatever reason it may be.
If you are going to continue to call strangers liars even when given numbers, then I will say it here: You are a disgrace to the flag, and should learn to drive properly.
Torque numbers on the graph aren't what you said and you haven't shown any proof of your hand calculated MPG numbers.
Torque numbers on the graph aren't what you said and you haven't shown any proof of your hand calculated MPG numbers.
I’m not picking sides in this ridiculous argument as I am able to comprehend that individual use scenarios and personal choices as well as how we as owners choose to spend our money and how that choice really isn’t anyone else’s business are part of what makes this country great. It would be great if those arguing above (and I’m sure more to come below….) could open their minds up a little and just agree to disagree like civilized members of this community.
That graph actually shows about 110 HP at 1500 RPMs, so 110 X 5252 = 577,720 divided by 1500 = 385 ft/lbs which is 81% of the peak torque of 475 ft/lbs shown in that graph. Again, I am not picking sides here, just doing math…….
I’m not picking sides in this ridiculous argument as I am able to comprehend that individual use scenarios and personal choices as well as how we as owners choose to spend our money and how that choice really isn’t anyone else’s business are part of what makes this country great. It would be great if those arguing above (and I’m sure more to come below….) could open their minds up a little and just agree to disagree like civilized members of this community.
That graph actually shows about 110 HP at 1500 RPMs, so 110 X 5252 = 577,720 divided by 1500 = 385 ft/lbs which is 81% of the peak torque of 475 ft/lbs shown in that graph. Again, I am not picking sides here, just doing math…….
Looks like 100hp at 1500 RPM and 110 HP at 1700 rpm to me, no real way of knowing without grid lines.
I guess I should have just kept my mouth shut. Didn't mean to stir a hornets nest.
I will be going with the 3.73 (with locker) UNLESS I decide to add the Tremor package, which only allows the 4.30...
And 5 pages later, the conundrum continues........ How to start a forum brawl in 3 easy steps. Make thread that is oil type, gas vs diesel, or what gears. Gauranteed to have many many many posts argueing between 3-4 different users.