When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hand calculated. 35" MT tires with 4.56 gears gets better mileage than the same 35s with 3.73s did. It did get better mileage with the stock street tires and 3.73s.
so, if I put 4.56 gears in my truck with the 10spd I'll be doing like 2300rpm at 70mph in 10th gear. Gas mileage will be worse than my 460/zf5/4.10s with the same size tires.
so, if I put 4.56 gears in my truck with the 10spd I'll be doing like 2300rpm at 70mph in 10th gear. Gas mileage will be worse than my 460/zf5/4.10s with the same size tires.
Are you asking me or telling me? Can't really compare two different trucks and drivetrains. An OBS weighs considerably less, and so do the OBS drivetrain components so you have less parasitic loss, not to mention it is a manual vs an auto. The efficiency of the 460 and 7.3 isn't the same either.
If Ford offered a gas SD with the diesel 3.31 gears with the 10 speed that has three overdrive gears.
Someone on here that had one would be tell us how great it is. Like they say in the car business, there’s an *** for every seat!
Are you asking me or telling me? Can't really compare two different trucks and drivetrains. An OBS weighs considerably less, and so do the OBS drivetrain components so you have less parasitic loss, not to mention it is a manual vs an auto. The efficiency of the 460 and 7.3 isn't the same either.
I'm telling you. None of that crap matters when you're talking about raising the truck with taller tires and going to a lower gear. Lower gears do not get better fuel economy on the highway and higher gears don't get better fuel economy in the city. The overdrive in the 10R140 is higher than the ZF5 but turning 2000-2100RPM at 70mph when the fuel economy sweet spot on my engine and final drive is 1600-1700rpm. If I need more HP and TQ I only need to increase my RPM until I am making just enough to move my load either by downshifting or increasing speed in 10th gear. Sometimes in a wind I need to go 2300rpm to tow my trailer. On flat ground no wind I can tow in 10th gear at 70mph or 2000rpm. In California I could tow 1700-1800rpm and my fuel economy increased at least 2mpg.
The same argument about fuel economy with a supercharger always happens. People seem to think you are always needing 8psi of boost and you'll be turning 4k rpm. If you are making 50hp more at a lower rpm it could mean that you can tow at a lower rpm meaning you can possibly run a higher gear in your transmission which could give you better fuel economy.
Never has running a higher rpm got me better fuel economy. Add in extra rotating mass and reduced aerodynamics of larger tires then lower gears which will increase my rpm no way I'm getting better fuel economy.
You are insufferable. You realize that you are the mirror image of the posters you complain about....but it's OK because it's the 'side' you are on?
Why are you so triggered about this? You are cheerleading 3.73/3.55 much harder than anyone has ever praised 4.30's, but you can't see it because of your bias. Why do you promote less power to the wheels so intensely?
If I wanted to cheerlead 3.55/3.73 I would prominently point it out in my signature like so many 4.30 owners like to do, and maybe add a snazzy remark like "3.55 gets it done" or "3.73 sets you free". But nah, that would be too tacky. I, in reality, make a point of promoting diesel, or different gas gear ratios, when the situation calls for it. Look around, I in fact would like a 4.88 option so I could run 37 inch tires without being bogged down with 4.30 which has same effective ratio as 33 tires running 3.83 gearing.
The fact that so many 4.30 owners insist there is little or no difference to 4.30 compared to taller gearing for all situations runs contrary to industry understanding of drivetrain design.
Y'all missed your calling working as transmission engineers for one of the big three since you all seem so sure your way is the only way to go. Instead you are just a bunch bored people on the internet championing a cause that diesel owners chuckle at.
I'm telling you. None of that crap matters when you're talking about raising the truck with taller tires and going to a lower gear. Lower gears do not get better fuel economy on the highway and higher gears don't get better fuel economy in the city. The overdrive in the 10R140 is higher than the ZF5 but turning 2000-2100RPM at 70mph when the fuel economy sweet spot on my engine and final drive is 1600-1700rpm. If I need more HP and TQ I only need to increase my RPM until I am making just enough to move my load either by downshifting or increasing speed in 10th gear. Sometimes in a wind I need to go 2300rpm to tow my trailer. On flat ground no wind I can tow in 10th gear at 70mph or 2000rpm. In California I could tow 1700-1800rpm and my fuel economy increased at least 2mpg.
The same argument about fuel economy with a supercharger always happens. People seem to think you are always needing 8psi of boost and you'll be turning 4k rpm. If you are making 50hp more at a lower rpm it could mean that you can tow at a lower rpm meaning you can possibly run a higher gear in your transmission which could give you better fuel economy.
Never has running a higher rpm got me better fuel economy. Add in extra rotating mass and reduced aerodynamics of larger tires then lower gears which will increase my rpm no way I'm getting better fuel economy.
Say what you want, just going off of my experience. There is more to fuel mileage than just RPM, running at too low an RPM and lugging it can often get you worse fuel mileage because it requires more throttle input to maintain the same speed. Also did you even read my post correctly? Going with bigger tires didn't get me better fuel mileage.
I told you in post #3 “gears are a very sensitive topic on here”. It’s as if you’re attacking their baby.😂
Why is that like that in this forum? 95% of this forum is only a few people arguing over gears and motors. I do not understand people that get upset and whine as much about other peoples gears as this Ford forum.
If my choice of gears really bothers people then I have 2 words for them and it is not happy birthday.
I guess I should have just kept my mouth shut. Didn't mean to stir a hornets nest.
No way man, you asked an honest question. Unfortunately, rear gearing is a hot topic. Not really sure why people get all worked up about the build spec of someone else's truck but most of those threads end up like this unfortunately.
4.30 will move any load easier than 3.73s and gives you more available torque. You can argue all you want but it all boils down to basic physics. No advantages to having 3.73 gears over 4.30s on a gas engine with the 10 speed.
If you do the math, the 4.30 rear end has an advantage in first gear, after it shifts into 2nd gear it is basically equal to a 3.73 rear end running one gear lower, it's all well and good until both trucks hit 10th gear, at which point the 3.73 has an advantage. so, where do you spend the most time?
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.