Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Dad's Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 05:51 PM
  #151  
bruno2's Avatar
bruno2
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,575
Likes: 5
From: Broken Arrow , OK
Jim is having connecting rod envy I see. I knew this was going rear its ugly head sooner or later.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 06:12 PM
  #152  
first today's Avatar
first today
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 2
From: Prairieville, La
Club FTE Silver Member

Gary, I was doing some surfing and saw this article about the "Mutt".

Have you seen or read it? 500 horsepower 565 torque for $5,000.00. They used Eddie heads. It may not be very informative though... it only goes 6 pages deep before conclusion.

The Mutt - Tech - Parts Used - Hot Rod Magazine Page 2
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #153  
bruno2's Avatar
bruno2
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,575
Likes: 5
From: Broken Arrow , OK
Kyle, I don't know what to say about the article. The F 100 never had a 400. They had the 351M. So they may not even know what they did. The cranks are different in the two motors.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 06:39 PM
  #154  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Ok, I've read the bit in the link on rod length and cam timing. And they summarized by:
In general, to achieve the same piston position timing with short and long rods, the engine with longer rods should have a cam with slightly less duration and with a smaller lobe separation angle.
And, in their example the change from a 5" rod to a 6.2" rod was only 1.7° in intake valve closing, so that isn't a huge change with a large change in rod length. But, what it doesn't say is whether two engines having cam timing determined by "piston position" will cause them to run the same. Or, did I miss that?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 06:57 PM
  #155  
bruno2's Avatar
bruno2
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,575
Likes: 5
From: Broken Arrow , OK
Do we assume they know it was a 400? Gary, just going by what you went through to identify yours makes me wonder if it was a 400 or an M.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 06:58 PM
  #156  
first today's Avatar
first today
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 2
From: Prairieville, La
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by bruno2
Kyle, I don't know what to say about the article. The F 100 never had a 400. They had the 351M. So they may not even know what they did. The cranks are different in the two motors.
I can remember them in the 77 to 79 models. Then again they may have just been 351m's.

I also found an older thread here at FTE with some feuding, but an interesting link from member William William.

M-Block 351M/400 History

I am sure Gary has read most of this in some of his books already, but it is some cool history to learn.

And Gary I still vote for the Aussie heads.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 07:10 PM
  #157  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Kyle - I have read that one several times. They got lots of power, that's for sure.

However, by leaving the pistons down in the hole .030" they killed the quench they could have had from the Eddy closed-chamber heads. So the M/400's propensity to ping or clatter is still there in that engine. The problem they had was they couldn't find pistons with the proper dish to give them the right CR when zero-decked. Fortunately in the 6 years since they did that Tim has come along and provided pistons that fit most of our needs on the 400. He has pistons that give essentially the same CR they had, 10.5, while coming right to the top of the block, thereby giving good quench. The best of both worlds.

Anyway, while I'm not going to have quite as many cubes (408 vs their 431), and probably not as much cam, I do expect to make lots of power! Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 07:11 PM
  #158  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Yep, Bubba's site is one I have bookmarked. Lots of good info there.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 07:13 PM
  #159  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Originally Posted by bruno2
Do we assume they know it was a 400? Gary, just going by what you went through to identify yours makes me wonder if it was a 400 or an M.
They being Hot Rod? Yes, they had the crank ground to 4.2" so it had to have been a 400 as you can't grind a 3.5" throw M crank to get to 4.2".
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 07:26 PM
  #160  
bruno2's Avatar
bruno2
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,575
Likes: 5
From: Broken Arrow , OK
OK, I didn't see that part. I was thinking in the back f my head that Hot Rod wouldn't just throw something into their magazine w/o making sure it was accurate.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 07:45 PM
  #161  
ArdWrknTrk's Avatar
ArdWrknTrk
pedant
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,576
Likes: 38
From: EXTREME southwest CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by bruno2
Jim is having connecting rod envy I see. I knew this was going rear its ugly head sooner or later.
There's no replacement for displacement.
Try boring your block to 4.36"

Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Ok, I've read the bit in the link on rod length and cam timing. And they summarized by:
In general, to achieve the same piston position timing with short and long rods, the engine with longer rods should have a cam with slightly less duration and with a smaller lobe separation angle.
And, in their example the change from a 5" rod to a 6.2" rod was only 1.7° in intake valve closing
The difference in that graph is 1.7"-1", or... 0.7"

Are they saying ~'have the same amount of overlap with a tighter LSA'?

(sorry if I am not following closely. either the FTE server or my Gmail is having an issue. Seems notifications are held up for hours)
Maybe it's the NSA?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 09:16 PM
  #162  
CarolinaCanes's Avatar
CarolinaCanes
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Most definitely the nsa. It always is. Sneaky *******s
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 09:35 PM
  #163  
bruno2's Avatar
bruno2
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,575
Likes: 5
From: Broken Arrow , OK
Originally Posted by ArdWrknTrk
There's no replacement for displacement.
Try boring your block to 4.36"

The difference in that graph is 1.7"-1", or... 0.7"

Are they saying ~'have the same amount of overlap with a tighter LSA'?

(sorry if I am not following closely. either the FTE server or my Gmail is having an issue. Seems notifications are held up for hours)
Maybe it's the NSA?
If I took my cylinders over that far I would just have two long channels on both sides of the block.

My email hasn't updated the threads at all tonight. The only way I know if there is a reply is by actually logging on and checking the threads.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 10:11 PM
  #164  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
In the example they said the piston on the 6.2" rod would be at the same place at 53.3 degrees. That put it at the same place as the one on the 5" rod when it was at 55 degrees. Ergo a 1.7 degree diff due to the rods.

Email up dates? You are getting them? I think I'm getting yesterday's. Chris knows about and has alerted the proper folk, so hopefully they can find the plug and fix it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 12:11 AM
  #165  
Brad from Oz's Avatar
Brad from Oz
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CarolinaCanes
Most definitely the nsa. It always is. Sneaky *******s
Na, Obama just said they'd wind back on the sneaky action didn't he?

I'm sure the NSA handed back the keys to the candy store

My notifications are about 6 hours late, so it must be the Eschelon system
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE