When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Gary, I was doing some surfing and saw this article about the "Mutt".
Have you seen or read it? 500 horsepower 565 torque for $5,000.00. They used Eddie heads. It may not be very informative though... it only goes 6 pages deep before conclusion.
Kyle, I don't know what to say about the article. The F 100 never had a 400. They had the 351M. So they may not even know what they did. The cranks are different in the two motors.
Ok, I've read the bit in the link on rod length and cam timing. And they summarized by:
In general, to achieve the same piston position timing with short and long rods, the engine with longer rods should have a cam with slightly less duration and with a smaller lobe separation angle.
And, in their example the change from a 5" rod to a 6.2" rod was only 1.7° in intake valve closing, so that isn't a huge change with a large change in rod length. But, what it doesn't say is whether two engines having cam timing determined by "piston position" will cause them to run the same. Or, did I miss that?
Kyle, I don't know what to say about the article. The F 100 never had a 400. They had the 351M. So they may not even know what they did. The cranks are different in the two motors.
I can remember them in the 77 to 79 models. Then again they may have just been 351m's.
I also found an older thread here at FTE with some feuding, but an interesting link from member William William.
Kyle - I have read that one several times. They got lots of power, that's for sure.
However, by leaving the pistons down in the hole .030" they killed the quench they could have had from the Eddy closed-chamber heads. So the M/400's propensity to ping or clatter is still there in that engine. The problem they had was they couldn't find pistons with the proper dish to give them the right CR when zero-decked. Fortunately in the 6 years since they did that Tim has come along and provided pistons that fit most of our needs on the 400. He has pistons that give essentially the same CR they had, 10.5, while coming right to the top of the block, thereby giving good quench. The best of both worlds.
Anyway, while I'm not going to have quite as many cubes (408 vs their 431), and probably not as much cam, I do expect to make lots of power! Thanks!
OK, I didn't see that part. I was thinking in the back f my head that Hot Rod wouldn't just throw something into their magazine w/o making sure it was accurate.
Jim is having connecting rod envy I see. I knew this was going rear its ugly head sooner or later.
There's no replacement for displacement.
Try boring your block to 4.36"
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Ok, I've read the bit in the link on rod length and cam timing. And they summarized by:
In general, to achieve the same piston position timing with short and long rods, the engine with longer rods should have a cam with slightly less duration and with a smaller lobe separation angle.
And, in their example the change from a 5" rod to a 6.2" rod was only 1.7° in intake valve closing
The difference in that graph is 1.7"-1", or... 0.7"
Are they saying ~'have the same amount of overlap with a tighter LSA'?
(sorry if I am not following closely. either the FTE server or my Gmail is having an issue. Seems notifications are held up for hours)
Maybe it's the NSA?
There's no replacement for displacement.
Try boring your block to 4.36"
The difference in that graph is 1.7"-1", or... 0.7"
Are they saying ~'have the same amount of overlap with a tighter LSA'?
(sorry if I am not following closely. either the FTE server or my Gmail is having an issue. Seems notifications are held up for hours)
Maybe it's the NSA?
If I took my cylinders over that far I would just have two long channels on both sides of the block.
My email hasn't updated the threads at all tonight. The only way I know if there is a reply is by actually logging on and checking the threads.
In the example they said the piston on the 6.2" rod would be at the same place at 53.3 degrees. That put it at the same place as the one on the 5" rod when it was at 55 degrees. Ergo a 1.7 degree diff due to the rods.
Email up dates? You are getting them? I think I'm getting yesterday's. Chris knows about and has alerted the proper folk, so hopefully they can find the plug and fix it.