Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Bye Bye Front Drums

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2015 | 01:04 PM
  #541  
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Originally Posted by bajafishnut
I will wait until you get home amigo, and gladly take the one you have...I will pay for pack & shipping to San Diego. Thanks amigo, I can look for the other later.. when I know which one it is...

Baja
PM sent to ya.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2015 | 01:50 PM
  #542  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by JEFFFAFA
It's been decades since I've seen Bronco brackets. From memory I recall them being a LOT shorter than the truck ones. FYI.
Not sure what version Bronco you're referencing(?) --'66-'77 early body or, the '78/'79 full-sized body.

I take it HIO is referencing the '78/'79 body.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2015 | 01:51 PM
  #543  
bajafishnut's Avatar
bajafishnut
Cargo Master
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 45
From: La Ribera, Baja, Mexico
Got it, and sent the address + Muchos Gracias... Ordering the LH one now. Photos when they are installed.. Hope to be back home in Baja before T Day, and I have plenty to be thankful for.. Stay in the Funny Zone, laugh every day, live longer..

Baja
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #544  
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Originally Posted by ultraranger
Not sure what version Bronco you're referencing(?) --'66-'77 early body or, the '78/'79 full-sized body.

I take it HIO is referencing the '78/'79 body.
Yep. I was also Steve. The 78/79 ones. On 78/79 Broncos the rear inner brackets were D8TZ17787A and D8TZ17788A. Outers were D8TZ17795A and D8TZ17796A.
73/79 Styleside Dents (EXCEPT FOR F350 WITH 140" W.B.) without step bumper had inies D3TZ17787C and D3TZ17788C. And outies D3TZ17795B and D3TZ17796B. And now that I looked them up, yes , the Bronco ones are shorter. But you got something to add on too Hio to factory fit that contoured bumper. "You said so yourself Hawkeye", once you can weld you look at metal in a different way.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2015 | 09:51 AM
  #545  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by JEFFFAFA
Yep. I was also Steve. The 78/79 ones. On 78/79 Broncos the rear inner brackets were D8TZ17787A and D8TZ17788A. Outers were D8TZ17795A and D8TZ17796A.
73/79 Styleside Dents (EXCEPT FOR F350 WITH 140" W.B.) without step bumper had inies D3TZ17787C and D3TZ17788C. And outies D3TZ17795B and D3TZ17796B. And now that I looked them up, yes , the Bronco ones are shorter. But you got something to add on too Hio to factory fit that contoured bumper. "You said so yourself Hawkeye", once you can weld you look at metal in a different way.
Yessir... just weighing my options. I'm trying to sort out how much adaptation factory Bumps bracket would require or whether cutting up the 78/79 Bronco is a better solution.... Or perhaps simply drilling the Dent contour bumper for additional bolts
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2015 | 10:16 AM
  #546  
fswells's Avatar
fswells
Freshman User
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Ultrastranger, This is a little off topic from the current discussion but earlier in this thread you were discussing your booster/MC combo. Did your explorer MC fit on your f350 booster? I recently picked booth of these up and the holes in MC are a little narrow for the booster. Making them a little bigger isn't a problem, I just wondered if you ran into the same thing. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2015 | 10:46 AM
  #547  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by fswells
Ultrastranger, This is a little off topic from the current discussion but earlier in this thread you were discussing your booster/MC combo. Did your explorer MC fit on your f350 booster? I recently picked booth of these up and the holes in MC are a little narrow for the booster. Making them a little bigger isn't a problem, I just wondered if you ran into the same thing. Thanks!
No sir. The '95 Explorer MC I installed (NAPA p/n M3246) had a 2-bolt mounting flange on 3-3/16" centers --like most all Ford MCs with a horizontal mounting flange. My MC went right on the studs of the booster with no resistance.

NAPA AUTO PARTS | PART DETAILS

Check to make sure the studs are perpendicular to the face of the booster and aren't slightly splayed out.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2015 | 02:33 PM
  #548  
fswells's Avatar
fswells
Freshman User
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Thanks. I thought it should go right on. It's the same MC, I'll check the studs.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 09:14 PM
  #549  
73to79's Avatar
73to79
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ultraranger
On a very cold day in January, 2012, I pulled this electronically shifted Ford 4R70W 4-spd. automatic overdrive transmission from a 1998 3.8L V6 Mustang.



For over 3 years, it's been sitting quietly, off to the side in my shop, patiently waiting for some attention. I decided yesterday that today was the day to blow the dust and cob webs off of it and at least get it ready to begin the teardown process on it.

I made this holding fixture to hold the transmission on an engine stand, for the teardown/rebuild process.





I had to get the engine hoist out since trying to pick the transmission up and stab it onto the engine stand, by myself, would have been rather difficult.







This is the stock torque converter. I don't plan to re-use it since I have a brand new 2500 stall converter sitting in a box.

I made some torque converter installation/removal handles out of some long 3/8"-24 bolts, a couple of regular 3/8"-24 nuts and two 3/8"-24 coupling nuts. Even though I don't plan to use this torque converter, I didn't want to risk the stock converter getting dammage by it possibly slipping out of my hands and hitting the floor.





Transmission I.D. tag located on right side, just behind the bell housing.



There are two primary versions of this transmission. One is designed to fit 'Windsor' style blocks: this includes 240/300, mid-'65-'68 289, all 302/5.0L, 351W/5.8L , 351C, 3.8L V6 and 4.2L V6 engines. The other 4R70W is designed for 4.6L/5.4L Modular Ford engine blocks. --the bell housings are integral and do not unbolt.

In the following photo, I have two arrows pointing to the bolt holes for the starter. If there are (2) starter bolt holes, the transmission is compatible with a 'Windsor' style block pattern.



If there are (3) starter bolt holes, the 4R is for a 4.6L/5.4L engine.

Great info , thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 03:23 PM
  #550  
sportjb618's Avatar
sportjb618
New User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Thank you for all the info you have posted on your 4r70w and truck. I am a novice mechanic but want to do the same swap into my 88 F150 351w w/ c6. Any extra pictures/tips/tricks would be phenomenal! I can't find enough information on this swap.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 04:33 PM
  #551  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Links to In formation on the 4R70W

Originally Posted by sportjb618
Thank you for all the info you have posted on your 4r70w and truck. I am a novice mechanic but want to do the same swap into my 88 F150 351w w/ c6. Any extra pictures/tips/tricks would be phenomenal! I can't find enough information on this swap.
I'm glad if you found something useful in the information I posted on my '98 4R70W transmission.

When I initially bought my truck 5 years ago, I had the notion I was going to install an '88-'93 AOD --even though I'm not really crazy about that transmission (I currently have a C-4). However, after doing a lot of reading/research on the AOD, AODE and the 4R70W, it was clear to me the 4R70W was a much superior transmission to the AOD and the AODE and that's what I decided to get.

From an installation and expense stand-point, the AOD is 'simpler/easier' but, the 4R70W has capabilities way beyond the AODE and even more so than the old AOD. If you're spreading your cost out over time, like I am, the added expense on the front end isn't bad compared to the advantages the 4R70W will give over the long run, after its installation is complete.

I've never rebuilt an automatic, let alone a 4-speed electronically-shifted transmission but, there's a lot of information about this transmission on the internet plus, I have the Ford Service Department transmission rebuild manuals and many of the service department transmission tools for the 4R70W (bought them off ebay).

There's a lot of good information located here:

1. TCCoA Tech Articles

2. 4R70W Automatic Transmission

3.BEC AODE & 4R70W Information
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 07:16 PM
  #552  
dman2008's Avatar
dman2008
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 11
From: Southern AB
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by sportjb618
Thank you for all the info you have posted on your 4r70w and truck. I am a novice mechanic but want to do the same swap into my 88 F150 351w w/ c6. Any extra pictures/tips/tricks would be phenomenal! I can't find enough information on this swap.
There is a guy on YouTube that overhauls a 4r75w and it isn't hard, I did my own when I adapted it to my 466 BB. overdrive was one of the best mods I did to my 64, that and the Holley Efi kit.

D
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 07:24 PM
  #553  
sportjb618's Avatar
sportjb618
New User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Any idea on how hard the 4r70w internal swap to an AOD? I don't know if it would be easier to avoid the electronic controller that route or not. Maybe more advantageous for adjustments? And thank you for the links!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 08:11 PM
  #554  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by sportjb618
Any idea on how hard the 4r70w internal swap to an AOD? I don't know if it would be easier to avoid the electronic controller that route or not. Maybe more advantageous for adjustments? And thank you for the links!
I don't know. Like I said, I've never rebuilt an automatic before. For me and in the interest of keeping it simple and straight forward, if I was going to run an AOD, I would run an AOD. If I was going to run a 4R70W, I would run a 4R70W.

Putting the internals of a 4R70W into an AOD would give you the better wide ratio gearing of a 4R70W but, you would not be able to selectively turn the lockup converter on/off (the 4R70W transmission converter (bell) housing is around 7/8" deeper than the AOD to accommodate for the thicker 4R70W converter).

You would also not be able to tailor the shift points or line pressures through a shift controller head unit like you would with an actual 4R70W transmission. If you needed to tweak the shifting of the AOD, it means you're going to have dump the transmission oil, drop the pan and pull the valve body out to modify it (messy and a hassle if you had to do this anytime you wanted to make a change in the way the transmission shifts and when).

The (Baumann) stand-alone shift controller for a 4R70W comes with two settings --a stock shift setting and a 'performance' shift setting, which you can randomly switch between stock or performance. The performance setting can be tweaked to change shift points and line pressures and then saved at those settings --you can alter it and save new settings at anytime without ever touching the transmission.

The 4R70W could also be setup to be a 'manual' automatic with paddle shifters on the steering wheel or, whatever your imagination might come up with as a means to upshift or downshift the transmission with. Or, it can be setup to work as a normal automatic that shifts on its own or, you can switch back and forth between 'manual' automatic or fully-automatic shifting.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 08:26 PM
  #555  
sportjb618's Avatar
sportjb618
New User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Awesome info. Thank you.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE