Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

payload question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #136  
Chris Anchor's Avatar
Chris Anchor
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Cecil County, Maryland
Name:  DSC01315.jpg
Views: 513
Size:  37.3 KB

Name:  DSC01314.JPG
Views: 512
Size:  135.4 KB

As requested the labels on my truck. Chris
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #137  
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,308
Likes: 42
From: SW Virginia
Wow...that's a huge difference compared to others.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #138  
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,512
Likes: 18
From: Detroit
You are....

Originally Posted by Chris Anchor
As requested the labels on my truck. Chris
...the undisputed winner of the "macho F150" award.

I'll note that this is with E-rated tires, 55/60 lbs of pressure; those are definitely some real truck tires--not the little 20" rubber bands from "Pimp my Ride"....
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #139  
Chris Anchor's Avatar
Chris Anchor
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Cecil County, Maryland
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
Chris seems to have the heaviest load carrying capacity rig here,so far.

Chris, do You have the 10-1/4" rear end? With 7 lug steel wheels?

If so, Post up what the "Tire and Loading Information" sticker says. Maybe get a pix of it?
I looked it up and I have 9.75 gear set/.373 with the 17" steel rims. Chris
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #140  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Chris Anchor
Attachment 13590

Attachment 13591

As requested the labels on my truck. Chris
So in theory, this truck should weigh 8200 - 2598 = 5602 lbs? That seems kind of heavy for a single cab 4x4. It must be the 4x2 models with the 8200 gvwr package that get the 3000 lb payload? This has turned out to be a very interesting and informative thread.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #141  
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: None of your business
Originally Posted by tylus
I think you guys are getting yourselves worked up a little bit for something rather small guys...and if you don't like the 900 lbs capacity, "downgrade" your rims to the 17 or 18" rims. they can carry more weight



who really carries 4-5 200 lb people in the cab (or 4 250 lb'ers) + 700-800 lbs of trailer hitch weight and 300+ lbs in the bed?

honestly...how many do?



and if you do, why are you driving a F-150?
I'd like to get a crew cab truck for going ATVing. I would have 3-4 people, a 5x12 trailer with 2 quads on it and one in the bed. We do that now with my current truck for short trips.

In the future I'd like to get a 16x8 trailer so I could take a total of 5 ATVs. With gear, fuel, ect I think I would be way over those numbers and I don't think this should be a Superduty type load.

Mike
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #142  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,031
Likes: 1,521
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Chris Anchor
Attachment 13590

Attachment 13591

As requested the labels on my truck. Chris
I'm going to say that Ford must have a mathmatical formula to figure GVWR. 2598 lbs though impressive is a rediculous number. Why not 2600 lbs? Is (2) two pounds going to break the camel's back? Will the rear leaf springs bend? Will the tires pop? No, of course not. This has to be legal speak from Ford's attourneys.

Chris's beast has a payload rating of 1100 lbs more than my '88. That is a helluva truck sir!

Tim
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #143  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
Yeah, 2600 lbs is very impressive. But so is the 5600lbs curb weight.

Damn, these trucks are HEAVY!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #144  
dbossman's Avatar
dbossman
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 286
Likes: 32
another data point

Stopped by a local dealer today to check out a truck I saw this weekend while browsing around.

Its a 145" wb Lariat supercrew 4x4. Max trailer tow, 3.73 gears, 18 inch wheels, etc. It had running boards, lariat plus package, and the 36 gallon fuel tank.

I was hoping to see a payload up near the theoretical max as published on the ford web site (1560lbs).

Turns out this truck is rated for 1294 lbs. Not bad, but still 266 lbs below max. The extra fuel tank capacity takes about 62 lbs, leaving another 200 or so for the other bling I guess.

If a similarly equipped 4x2 adds back 200lbs, as the ford site says, the payload would be about 1500. That would probably work for my situation although I would like to see it a bit higher.


Tim
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #145  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
It seems You pay a pretty hefty premium (in lbs) for the SCrew
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #146  
Power Kid's Avatar
Power Kid
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Remember all versions of the 09 dropped weight for 09 due to changes in frame... with exxception of SCrew. Its also 6 in longer. Lets have the 8,200 GVW SCrew!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #147  
mg5ford's Avatar
mg5ford
New User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
payloads

Just want to throw these out. I have some old Ford brochures from whem I bought new trucks before. Here are some numbers from the brochures.
I used F150 supercab, 8 ft bed 4x4 to try and get weights somewhat close. Remember old 80's truck had metal dash, metal inner fenders under hood which may or may not make a difference.
1988 payload 1750, gvwr 6250 (wheelbase 155)

1993 payload 1720, gvwr 6250, gcwr 11,500, max trailer weight 6700
if 4.10 axle add 1000 lbs to above gcwr & gvwr.

1998 payload 1280, gvwr 6250, gcwr 12700, max trailer wgt 7700.
I pulled 29 ft travel trailer with f150 with 302 motor, 3.55 axle ratio from Maine to Florida with 6 of us and all personal stuff... Never felt like it was overloaded. But my 1977, 88,93 and 97 had a helper spring on top of rear spring pack. Maybe that could help out the payload and tongue weight issues. I now tend to believe the comments on Ford trying to keep safe and out of court like Explorer issue with tires. The 93 and 97 catalog does start to change numbers different axle ratios, stick or auto, and wheel size 16 or 17 inch. Just to add some thought toolder truck numbers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 09:10 PM
  #148  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,031
Likes: 1,521
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mg5ford
Just want to throw these out. I have some old Ford brochures from whem I bought new trucks before. Here are some numbers from the brochures.
I used F150 supercab, 8 ft bed 4x4 to try and get weights somewhat close. Remember old 80's truck had metal dash, metal inner fenders under hood which may or may not make a difference.
1988 payload 1750, gvwr 6250 (wheelbase 155)

1993 payload 1720, gvwr 6250, gcwr 11,500, max trailer weight 6700
if 4.10 axle add 1000 lbs to above gcwr & gvwr.

1998 payload 1280, gvwr 6250, gcwr 12700, max trailer wgt 7700.
I pulled 29 ft travel trailer with f150 with 302 motor, 3.55 axle ratio from Maine to Florida with 6 of us and all personal stuff... Never felt like it was overloaded. But my 1977, 88,93 and 97 had a helper spring on top of rear spring pack. Maybe that could help out the payload and tongue weight issues. I now tend to believe the comments on Ford trying to keep safe and out of court like Explorer issue with tires. The 93 and 97 catalog does start to change numbers different axle ratios, stick or auto, and wheel size 16 or 17 inch. Just to add some thought toolder truck numbers.
Well that's a good indicator as to how much trucks have changed over the years.

I was on the Ford build site earlier this evening and built an XLT Screw. 6.5' bed, 4x4 with the 5.4L and 3.73 axles and max trailer tow package. The came with the 36 gallon fuel tank and I added bed access steps as well as tubular running boards. The max payload of this set-up is 1580 lbs.

This package is identical to Bsimmer3000's Plat except it's not a plat. His I believe has the 3.55.1 axles. Why the huge difference?

Tim
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #149  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tseekins
Well that's a good indicator as to how much trucks have changed over the years.

I was on the Ford build site earlier this evening and built an XLT Screw. 6.5' bed, 4x4 with the 5.4L and 3.73 axles and max trailer tow package. The came with the 36 gallon fuel tank and I added bed access steps as well as tubular running boards. The max payload of this set-up is 1580 lbs.

This package is identical to Bsimmer3000's Plat except it's not a plat. His I believe has the 3.55.1 axles. Why the huge difference?

Tim
This is what i cant understand Tim. But when you see the payload figures for the platinum, Speak to ford dealers, speak to people high up at ford they all told me the same thing as online. 1500lbs as spec'd. I would like to know why the difference in fords numbers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #150  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,031
Likes: 1,521
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bsimmer3000
This is what i cant understand Tim. But when you see the payload figures for the platinum, Speak to ford dealers, speak to people high up at ford they all told me the same thing as online. 1500lbs as spec'd. I would like to know why the difference in fords numbers.
I think someone at Ford screwed up. Additionally, I want to know why the 8200 lbs package isn't available on the screw. In my mind, it's the most likely version of a Ford that needs it. Hense, SUPER CREW. The truck was initially designed and marketed to carry a crew of workers to the job site, (work truck). Ford and all the others quickly adapted these trucks and thier marketing strategies toward light duty family use. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CONTRACTORS!? Did Ford forget about the guys that need / want a fancy work truck?

I have come to believe that I'm missing a point or THE point. Maybe I'm just thick or stubborn, I've been associated with both.

I've tried to do a comparison with the Toyota and GM pound for pound, but Ford has so many damned options and packages that it's difficult to do an exact comparo.


Tim
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE