When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hmmm, maybe the reason mr, nitrous & supercharger hasn't been seen around lately, is becuase he probably hit the nitrous right after that "whipple" charger kicked in.
Right now he's probably half way to the moon, still holding on to the steering wheel from what used to be his "hipo-impala"
"just a thought"
1988 F-150, SWB, 5.0 EFI (formerly 4.9 EFI), M5OD 5 speed, 3.08 gears, Summit shorty truck headers, Custom built Flowmaster exhaust system. Force 4 LP6000 lightbar, Federal signal PA-300 100 watt siren, Icom IC-V100 50 watt mobile radio.
=======================================
1965 F-100 (just purchased 1/18/01), SWB, 390, C-6 auto. Dual exhaust, Not much else to do to it.
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 12-Jul-01 AT 02:05 PM (EST)[/font][p]Well then maybe the Camaro driver sucked then, or maybe his car did. Or maybe the Lightning driver was just too quick at the throttle for him. I have no idea if the Lightning was stock or not. I only know the guy stomped the Camaro in the ground.
Should have used "later" model instead of "late" model. Because
I know that somewhere in the later years the suspension was r&r'd
to be as or simulative of the ZR-1 or ZO-6 or whatever the hell
it is. Around the same time the Firehawk(?) came out. I don't
keep up with GM's crap so i'm not positive on the stats.
Drivers make a big difference in the F-bods. I've seen a stock M6 LS1 Z-28 run a 13.0@107, but I've seen plenty of them run mid 14s too. So, with that in mind, and having done it myself, a Gen 2 Lightning can certainly outrun an F-body, even an SS, once the driver is factored in.
Later!
Jeff S.
Lightning #74 in '95 - 11.92@115.2
Lightning #582 in '00 - 13.36@101.75
Thier not biased,fords just suck so bad it seems that way to people that don't have the common sense to own a chevrolet.No one would belive a lightning could run with a vette,not even a modified lightning.Now i'm not saying the lightnings aren't fast,they're extremly fast,but were talking about a vette.I owned an 96 vette and its nowere near as fast as a c-5,but it would take any but the most higly modified lightnings.On its worst day 13.80's were common.I raced many times at houston raceway park to see exactly what I coud run,and I know why you ford people get so upset,if I got outran as often as you ford folks do I would be upset too.
Thier not biased,fords just suck so bad it seems that way to people that don't have the common sense to own a chevrolet.No one would belive a lightning could run with a vette,not even a modified lightning.Now i'm not saying the lightnings aren't fast,they're extremly fast,but were talking about a vette.I owned an 96 vette and its nowere near as fast as a c-5,but it would take any but the most higly modified lightnings.On its worst day 13.80's were common.I raced many times at houston raceway park to see exactly what I coud run,and I know why you ford people get so upset,if I got outran as often as you ford folks do I would be upset too.
haha a vette might be able to haul butt but it cant haul lumber, jetskis , camping gear etc .. all i can say is a lightning is a waycool ride and if my lightning wont beat your vette my gto or my firebird WILL! haha at vette people being so worried that a TRUCK might beat em and then talking smack about henry ford . no doubt a vette is waycool too but the bang 4 the buck i get with my lightning 351w is way better than u can get with your girlish looking vette . hahaha
Hey fordsajoke....
I can see why you buy chevy's...or is that Chevrolet still don't get it?
1 You can not spell
2 Comparing a truck to a car is totally ridiculous
3 I have a friend who thought he was smart and bought 7 Chevrolets for his AC business and all been in the shop min. 4 times, as of today, one has been 9 times<- this number will change.
4 GM produces nothing but junk, transmissions definitely
5 Someone needs to blow money, why not you?
So brag as you may, but comparing chevy to Ford is like comparing Diamonds to crystal?
Paul
78 F150 4x4 400 4bbl/C6
98 F150 4x4 offroad < been through pure hell....:-)
i agree none of this built like a rock bs or differ like dodge give me a truck thats BUILT FORD TOUGH ol henry ford knew how to build a truck . and for that non spelling vette dude if my ford wont beat u just dont stop because i will ram your vette into submission 10-4 .haha ha hehe
ok ford fans, the facts
are in, and it doesn't look
good for the lightning. 1/4
mile, 2001
lightning-14.3@99mph. corvette
z06-12.6@112 mph, winner-
chevy! 0-60, lightning-6.2.
corvette z06-4.3, winner-chevy
by nearly 2 seconds! miles per
gallon, lightning 13, corvette
19, winner, chevy once again
(is anybody seeing a trend
here?).600 ft. slalom speed,
lightning 61.3,
corvette-68.4.braking 60-0 mph,
ligtning 150 ft. corvette
z06-111 ft. winner, in no
surprise...chevy!! and yet the
lightning has more hp? in
conclusion the lighning is
nothing but a horsepower loaded
non-gas mileage getting piece
of ford! while on the other
hand the corvette is just one
fine piece of work from the
best car maker in the world.
next time lets try putting the
lightning up against something
more of it's type, like the
chevy metro!!
hahaha its a truck beavis get a
grip on your life and seek help
a vettes a vette and a trucks a
truck and for that 96 impala ss
black w/kicker subs 350
cu.in.its a hunk of crap i
owned one and had nothing but
problems with it and it didnt
do donuts very well and some
pimple faced teenager in a kia
beat me from stoplight to
stoplight . i own a lightning
now with a 351w twweeked out
with a few bolt ons and i am
searching for that lil punk in
that kia who embarrased me
while in that impala . i will
race him and then tell his
mother he has been out tearing
up her car.
ROFL! Here we go with another Chevy boy and their bizarre logic - comparing a truck to a sports car.
First, Chevy Boy, that 14.3 is pretty pathetic. My stock 2000 truck ran 13.60s. Stock 2001s run 13.40s. Granted that's not enough to unseat a Z06, but how about we compare it to ANY Chevy truck? Eh? Awwww... so sad, you lose.
How about we compare a stock Lightning to a stock Impala SS? Oooo, that would be scary for you, huh SS-boy? The Impala SS couldn't match a Gen 1 Lightning in ANY measure of performance, to say nothing of a Gen 2.
Shame shame shame, a truck putting the smack on a car - granted, it's just a glorified taxi, but still... It's a car!
Later!
Jeff S.
Lightning #74 in '95 - 11.92@115.2
Lightning #582 in '00 - 13.36@101.75
i agree 100% with you JEFF . i feel like snapping something off in that dudes well u know . hahah the chevy people are so very hate filled i bet they get constipated and lose sleep worrying when that bad to the bone lightning pulls up next to them and scares them . i bet they would make a quick left or right turn to avoid any sort of conflict with the bad to the bone lightning driver haha . KEEP UP THE WAYCOOL WORK JEFF U ROCK !
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!
Joe Kucinski
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!
Michael S. Palmer
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)
first of all son, you've never seen a such a heavily modified impala as mine. what do you think about a whipple supercharger, edlebrock headers, borla exhaust, 180 hp nos,high-performance computer chip, XGT-Z michelin radial rubbers, a 2 in. body drop, and AS MUCH WEIGHT AS A LIGHTNING, but pushing 500 horse, i can eat a 1/4 mile in 12.64 and any lightning you wanna throw at me and got the timeslip to prove it. oh by the way i was riding with my friend in his trans am firehawawk, and we just happened to see a lightning on the interstate and just happened to blow him away at 150 while the poor lightning was geared so low at 140. winner-trans am! (darnit, chevs(or pontiacs, the same company) just seem to win every time don't they!?) ok, i will say one thing though, the lighning is a nice truck and is fast, but just can't hang with superior sports cars from g.m.
KEY WORD SPORTS CAR .. LIGHTNINGS A TRUCK DINGLEBERRY. AND 500 hp isnt all that good . lol@ superior sports car . i think the problem here is that guy is mildly retarded hahha remember CORKY from that tv show they had a few years back .
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 11-Jul-01 AT 06:58 PM (EST)[/font]
Jeff
I agree with the HotRod thing 100%.Just f__king pathetic!
I know for a fact the Lightning will eat up the late model Camaro
with the hipo package and ZR-1 suspension. Saw that in person,
3 times. The Lightning wasted it.
Mr. Imputant SS needs to go lay down somewhere(Impala).
The Lightning is art, man. Plain and simple.
Garett
garett i agree . that ss dude just wants to be like us WAY COOL AND BAD TO THE BONE AND 2FAST4LUV 10-FO.
I am in total agreeence with you, becasue when i went to look at the 2001 Lightning becasue that is my dream truck and when i get outta basic traing for the air force it is wha i am going to be driving. but anyway the sales guy started telling me about how some guy bought a brand new corvette and took it back becasue it got beat by a lightning and went there to buy one instead of his corvette. i love what ford has done to their trucks all even the std f-150's they are by far the nicest trucks but none compare to the lighning.