Notices
2017 - 2022 Super Duty The 2017-2022 Ford F250, F350, F450, F550 & F600 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Carli Suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2018 | 02:12 PM
  #286  
theboom's Avatar
theboom
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 464
Likes: 29
I am just trying to figure out the overall height of the truck so does anyone know about how much the rear of an f350 srw with the carli Add-A-Pack rear spring will sag with about 1000lbs in the bed? I know the add a pack is going to add about 1/2" height with no weight in it, I just need to know how much around 1000lbs would bring it back down.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 01:56 PM
  #287  
Sharky75's Avatar
Sharky75
New User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Sil17SD
Just looking for some advice here......

Current setup:
Carli 2.5"coils
Carli 2.5 kings
Carli steering stabilizer
Carli track bar
STOCK rear springs (full deavers ordered)
37x12.5r20 ridge grapplers set at 45psi

The truck started with 2"spacer and 2" lift fox 2.0 shocks not carli tuned straight from fox. Then I added carli track bar. Swapped the spacers out and added carli coils and bump stop drops. At that time the truck had 35x12.5r20 ridge grapplers on it.

This truck is on rough farm roads and patched up asphalt a lot (50-60% of the time). I beat it pretty hard for 32k miles but was very happy with it.The last week the 35s were on it and the first week the 37s were on it I really beat on it. So i started noticing the truck was giving a lot of feedback through the steering wheel. Sure enough I checked the shocks and yep front driver shock was shot. So I bit the bullet after talking with carli and bought pin tops and steering stabilizer.

Well it was an instant improvement for sure but I'm still (5000mi later) noticing a lot of steering wheel feedback on the hwy (way more than when the 35s where on it when the fox shocks were new). The truck feels very stiff and rocks side to side in big rolling potholes significantly more than it did with the fox shocks. With the fox shocks I did feel the front bump stops contact a couple times a day. I dont think I've managed to even make them kiss with the pintops until I checked the pressure and they were @300psi so I dropped them to 225psi and now I think they do move easier. But maybe even more steering wheel feedback now.

Has anyone ever felt the pintops were valved too stiff. I read stories were people say they're actually looking for manhole covers and potholes that they used to go around. This has turned out to be opposite, I now have respect for the ones I would drive right over with the previous setup.

So my question is do you guys think the rear springs will fix the side to side harshness and overall stiffness.

I haven't had time to get it to the alignment to see if some of the hwy feedback when crossing expansion joints, asphalt patches ,pot holes etc is due to a worn ball joint or tie rod end. I did replace my drag link as it had some wear but it wasnt terrible.

I understand I do have a larger tire now and think some of these characteristics are to be expected but not all of them.

I think I have a couple different things going on, but just looking to see what you guys think.

Also, please know this is not a bash on Carli at all, I just wanna get this figured out

I've been contemplating this post for a whil. But didn't do it because I think their products are bad *** and I dont wanna trash them.

I really wanna make this work this thing has actually started to make my back hurt and causing extra fatigue on the same roads I traveled day in day out for 32000 miles with no trouble.

I have checked all the joints in the front end and cant find any problems. But have not had time to jack it up and check ball joints.

TIA for any suggestions.
I've had the 2.5" pintop for about three weeks now on my 17 250 - difference from yours is I do have the deavers, radius arms, & on 18s. Everything went on at the same time so cannot speak to how much of the improvement is just from the deavers but will say that setup as is does ride very well. Certainly better on mine vs stock on the usual roads I drive daily. I would definitely expect the deavers to help, but not sure if that the sole culprit. Sorry I know that doesn't help you about your ride quality - the reason I'm responding is that I also have a lot of feedback in my steering wheel. I also have the Carli steering stabilizer - tried reducing the pressure a little which helped but still have quite a bit of feedback. I think we might be among the first with their stabilizer setup & have not seen anyone previously mention any issues with feedback like we both have.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 05:11 PM
  #288  
Tricon's Avatar
Tricon
Logistics Pro
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 51
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Sil17SD
Just looking for some advice here......
Current setup:
Carli 2.5"coils
Carli 2.5 kings
Carli steering stabilizer
Carli track bar
STOCK rear springs (full deavers ordered)
37x12.5r20 ridge grapplers set at 45psi
.
Not so much a question, but you should never alter the nitrogen pressure to adjust ride characteristics. That nitrogen is purely there to stop the oil from cavitating. If you want a softer/more compliant ride you need to adjust the valve stack. You can have King do this, but they are backed up over 7-8 weeks at the moment because of all the races going on right now. Fox should be able to take care of you right away as they have a much bigger service department...but that doesn't really help you.

It sounds to me like your Kings are just valved too stiff, especially if you liked the Foxes before that as a lot of guys say the 2.0's are a little too soft in their stock valving. When I revalved my 2.5's I went a tad stiffer...but not really much at all. And I only did it because I offroad almost every weekend. Couple things to check, is your Track bar at 406 lbs of torque? Have you tried playing with tire pressure? Were your 35's the same tire as before?

I was the one that said I aim for potholes now that I put my 2.5's and Carli coils in But I can tell you I still get a lot of feedback when I drop my toy hauler off and drive home unloaded, the tires are at 65psi and air bags about 20psi and I can feel a lot more in the road. Big bumps are still butter, but the little stuff like manholes I start noticing whereas I never do when I run 45/40psi and none in the bags.

Deavers will give you a pretty huge boost in ride quality. You'll only have about the same payload as an F150 though, but the ride will be noticeably better. You can also give Atlas Spring a call, they can build you a full stack rear leaf spring that will give you a better ride but let you keep your payload. HOWEVER, this isnt going to fix the issues you're having now. It might mask some of them, but if you're rocking a lot more than you used to...and the only thing you changed was shocks and the SS, I think you just prefer a softer shock valving.

Have you tried putting the stock SS back in and see if that changes the feedback portion of your equation? (I'm guessing its your tires though...)
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 05:31 PM
  #289  
Sil17SD's Avatar
Sil17SD
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Tricon
Not so much a question, but you should never alter the nitrogen pressure to adjust ride characteristics. That nitrogen is purely there to stop the oil from cavitating. If you want a softer/more compliant ride you need to adjust the valve stack. You can have King do this, but they are backed up over 7-8 weeks at the moment because of all the races going on right now. Fox should be able to take care of you right away as they have a much bigger service department...but that doesn't really help you.

It sounds to me like your Kings are just valved too stiff, especially if you liked the Foxes before that as a lot of guys say the 2.0's are a little too soft in their stock valving. When I revalved my 2.5's I went a tad stiffer...but not really much at all. And I only did it because I offroad almost every weekend. Couple things to check, is your Track bar at 406 lbs of torque? Have you tried playing with tire pressure? Were your 35's the same tire as before?

I was the one that said I aim for potholes now that I put my 2.5's and Carli coils in But I can tell you I still get a lot of feedback when I drop my toy hauler off and drive home unloaded, the tires are at 65psi and air bags about 20psi and I can feel a lot more in the road. Big bumps are still butter, but the little stuff like manholes I start noticing whereas I never do when I run 45/40psi and none in the bags.

Deavers will give you a pretty huge boost in ride quality. You'll only have about the same payload as an F150 though, but the ride will be noticeably better. You can also give Atlas Spring a call, they can build you a full stack rear leaf spring that will give you a better ride but let you keep your payload. HOWEVER, this isnt going to fix the issues you're having now. It might mask some of them, but if you're rocking a lot more than you used to...and the only thing you changed was shocks and the SS, I think you just prefer a softer shock valving.

Have you tried putting the stock SS back in and see if that changes the feedback portion of your equation? (I'm guessing its your tires though...)
I know that dropping nitrogen pressure is not really a form of tuning them . But I also know the higher the pressure the stickier they can get. I did drop them to 180psi and it calmed down some of the feedback and softened the ride some But it is still pretty harsh.

I think you're right, the valving in these things is the root of my problem. I agree the rear springs are gonna help but not completely fix the rough ride.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 10:45 PM
  #290  
honda250xtitan's Avatar
honda250xtitan
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 554
is the extra feedback from the trackbar using Heims/uniball bearings instead of injection molded rubber bushings? Also the kings have spherical bearings instead of rubber bushings right? All these "race" oriented parts will add more feedback to the cab. wondering if some guys notice it more then others? Just wait till all those parts rust and start to squeak
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2018 | 10:59 PM
  #291  
Sil17SD's Avatar
Sil17SD
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by honda250xtitan
is the extra feedback from the trackbar using Heims/uniball bearings instead of injection molded rubber bushings? Also the kings have spherical bearings instead of rubber bushings right? All these "race" oriented parts will add more feedback to the cab. wondering if some guys notice it more then others? Just wait till all those parts rust and start to squeak
Yep heims everywhere. But when I first did the track bar it really minimized feed back well actually it minimized the bump steer. I think those joints will cause more of a noise type feed back. The feedback I'm getting is like you left a shock bolt loose or have bad shock bushings. slop

And yes all hardware is tight, believe me I've even checked bolts I never took loose like 3or 4 times.

The firmness (rough ride) is the main issue not the feedback.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 11:50 AM
  #292  
shawnw17's Avatar
shawnw17
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Really been researching the hell out of this subject and struggling to nail down a decision....

I originally planned on running a Commuter 2.5 setup because I never go offroad. After talking to some vendors it seemed like the Backcountry 2.5 kit was a better fit for me. Mainly, I drive 40-50k miles a year and probably tow 20-25k of that. I don't tow "heavy" but I tow far (150 mile trips each way on the weekend and 5-800 mile trips to WV/NH/ME/TN towing a trailer with multiple RZR's). As part of that conversation I was swayed towards the Deaver's as I'm really looking to tone down the harsh handle on bridge joints, potholes (NYS roads suck), etc... Now I'm second guessing myself with the Deaver's as I want to get a leveled stance and it seems like anyone with a Backcounctry 2.5 + Deavers is keeping their stock rake. As I understand it the add-a-packs provide less lift and a marginal increase in ride quality. From what I gather the add-a-packs are the go-to with the Commuter kit and the Deaver's are the go-to with the Backcountry.

Can anyone comment on what might be best? I feel like the more I read the more difficult it becomes to nail down the "right" combination for me. I "only" plan on running 37's.

Thanks,
Shawn
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 11:53 AM
  #293  
wicked 2018's Avatar
wicked 2018
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by shawnw17
Really been researching the hell out of this subject and struggling to nail down a decision....

I originally planned on running a Commuter 2.5 setup because I never go offroad. After talking to some vendors it seemed like the Backcountry 2.5 kit was a better fit for me. Mainly, I drive 40-50k miles a year and probably tow 20-25k of that. I don't tow "heavy" but I tow far (150 mile trips each way on the weekend and 5-800 mile trips to WV/NH/ME/TN towing a trailer with multiple RZR's). As part of that conversation I was swayed towards the Deaver's as I'm really looking to tone down the harsh handle on bridge joints, potholes (NYS roads suck), etc... Now I'm second guessing myself with the Deaver's as I want to get a leveled stance and it seems like anyone with a Backcounctry 2.5 + Deavers is keeping their stock rake. As I understand it the add-a-packs provide less lift and a marginal increase in ride quality. From what I gather the add-a-packs are the go-to with the Commuter kit and the Deaver's are the go-to with the Backcountry.

Can anyone comment on what might be best? I feel like the more I read the more difficult it becomes to nail down the "right" combination for me. I "only" plan on running 37's.

Thanks,
Shawn
Why not hold off on the rear springs for now, just do the shocks. Do your lift in the front, shocks in the rear and rims/tires. Then see how it rides and go from there.

You may find the larger tires and shocks mellows out the rear enough for you without touching the spring...

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-1

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-8

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 12:13 PM
  #294  
shawnw17's Avatar
shawnw17
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by wicked 2018
Why not hold off on the rear springs for now, just do the shocks. Do your lift in the front, shocks in the rear and rims/tires. Then see how it rides and go from there.

You may find the larger tires and shocks mellows out the rear enough for you without touching the spring...
Certainly an option. I'm willing to entertain all ideas and options honestly. What are your thoughts regarding commuter vs. backcountry?

Thanks,
Shawn
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 12:18 PM
  #295  
Tricon's Avatar
Tricon
Logistics Pro
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 51
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by shawnw17
Certainly an option. I'm willing to entertain all ideas and options honestly. What are your thoughts regarding commuter vs. backcountry?

Thanks,
Shawn
Personally I'd go with the backcountry purely for the added oil capacity in the reservoirs for towing...but I geek out on shocks more than most so the ROI in that system might not be as apparent to some.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 12:47 PM
  #296  
shawnw17's Avatar
shawnw17
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tricon
Personally I'd go with the backcountry purely for the added oil capacity in the reservoirs for towing...but I geek out on shocks more than most so the ROI in that system might not be as apparent to some.
The oil capacity is the main reason the Backcountry was recommended to me. In addition to that it seems like the valving would be more appropriate to "taming" the beast.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2018 | 06:22 PM
  #297  
ymsmiley's Avatar
ymsmiley
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 351
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Getting my Carli pintop installed now, just dropped it off. Took for effing ever but finally showed up yesterday. King SS another 3 weeks out
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:26 PM
  #298  
imtrich76's Avatar
imtrich76
New User
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
If anyone on AZ is interested, I am selling a carli 2.5 full progressive leaf spring pack and U bolts. Had them on my 2015 6.7 f350 CCLB for 10,000 miles but had to swap back to stock for fifth wheel towing. Asking 1k obo.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:38 PM
  #299  
Tricon's Avatar
Tricon
Logistics Pro
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 51
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by imtrich76
If anyone on AZ is interested, I am selling a carli 2.5 full progressive leaf spring pack and U bolts. Had them on my 2015 6.7 f350 CCLB for 10,000 miles but had to swap back to stock for fifth wheel towing. Asking 1k obo.
Are those the same springs for a 17+? Carli lists them as different part numbers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:43 PM
  #300  
imtrich76's Avatar
imtrich76
New User
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ

Originally Posted by Tricon
Are those the same springs for a 17+? Carli lists them as different part numbers.
I think they are different, the part numbers on the spring sticker is
D10045L18

 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

story-0
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-5
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-7
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE