When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Nothing like playing musical vehicles, I always say.....
Good luck with 'er, Gary she's in good hands!
Thanks! I'm anxious to get to Big Blue. But, I have to get the priorities correct. So, I just got through going through the mountain of parts again as they have to be moved to allow access to the lift. Put some things away where I already have designated spots, like carb and ignition components. And consolidated others into boxes for interior, suspension, trim, etc. Tomorrow I'll started carrying things to the attic.
Maybe by Wednesday I can get to Big Blue.
Originally Posted by ArdWrknTrk
It deserves an ecoboost to make up for all the LS swaps into Ford vehicles.
I thought you liked 460's. But, I will say that the day of NA engines is upon us. My brother was blown away how a little 3.5L in an F150 towed that 7.0L F250HD.
My brother was blown away how a little 3.5L in an F150 towed that 7.0L F250HD.
Modern engines can produce a lot of power; engineers have figured out how to use computer controls to extract more power from all those little explosions, what with Variable Valve Timing and whatever they have these days.
The computer controls on our generation of stuff is just what's necessary to make the thing run.
I thought you liked 460's. But, I will say that the day of NA engines is upon us. My brother was blown away how a little 3.5L in an F150 towed that 7.0L F250HD.
Um. .... 7.5l.
The 7.0 is a 429.
Twin turbos and EEC can make a lot of power. When you add 14.7 pounds of boost at sea level you are effectively doubling the size of the engine.
30 pounds of boost in a 3.5l makes it more than 10.5l.
Chris, Nissan/Infinity has a variable compression engine out for the 2018 MY.
Oddly enough, I went through a class on this stuff... I'm gonna guess within the past 3-5 years. Taught by my brother, actually.
He works as a claims adjuster for an insurance company that provides aftermarket extended warranties. He tries to get ripped off regularly, and so needs to remain current.
He teaches classes to the newbie adjusters, he ran us all through what he teaches them.
Yeah, that vvt combined with all the other things they do these days, today's small engines can make a lot of power.
Our technology/trucks will soon be reclassified as "relics." Ancient history.
I don't know how much boost the EB will actually give, but I see 12 psi routinely just before it downshifts under part throttle. So, under WOT it'll be significant. And, it does it at altitude too.
The EB is a great engine, but when you are using it to it's full capacity it drinks the fuel like any other engine doesn't it? I don't think they will ever get away from that. I suppose it's still more efficient than the 460 would have been towing the same load.
The powerstroke's are the same way. Good fuel mileage until you step on it and the turbo kicks in.
We towed/hauled about 9000 lbs, including an '85 250HD on a trailer sitting up high, at 75 MPH and got 9 MPG. I'm not sure what a 460 would have done, but the EB did it with no fanfare. I locked it out of 6th so it was running 2100 RPM in 5th, and would go to 2500 in 4th, and 3000 in 3rd when it really needed to.
But, on the way down we got 14+ MPG towing Brandon's 2000+ lb trailer, again at 75 MPH. And running light at 75 MPH it'll get 17 MPG. Any 460's do that?
We towed our 5000 lb boat to the Grand Canyon south rim, which is about 7100'. Still had 12 psi boost just before the part-throttle downshift and I could not tell any difference whatsoever in how it pulled. I'm sold.
....The powerstroke's are the same way. Good fuel mileage until you step on it and the turbo kicks in.
Not my experience. My '02 PowerStroke got 13 mpg empty at 65 mph and 11 mpg hauling a camper, towing a Bronco through the mountains at 75 mph. I couldn't believe what a fuel hog that thing was any time the engine was spinning (it desperately needed taller gears than the 3.73s it had). But the mileage hardly dropped with a load.