When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The Cummins doesn't take advantage of the torque because the automatic transmission is nothing compared to the Torqshift. If you have a manual transmission then you don't have torque multiplication and therefore the PSD is actually producing more low RPM torque at the rear wheels.
I don't dispute the Torqshift is an immeasurably better transmission, but I personally hate autos. I don't care how advanced they are. If you are going 45 mph and floor it, it always jams down a gear(with diesels its not as bad because you don't have to floor it). I don't like the way this feels so I feather the gas to try to keep it in the gear its in but it usually does it anyway. I like to be able to control what gear I am in in situations like this and just like the overall feel of the clutch and being able to switch gears when YOU want. I admit stop and go towing feels better with an auto but I'm not stop and go towing 24/7/365.
We have already went over the Ford vs. Dodge autos and really hammered it in how much better the Torqshift is. Everyone already knew that and personally I never really cared because I would never even consider buying a brand new truck with an auto. Lets compare standard vs. standard now please.
L.H., I'm talking about the PSD Torqshift vs Cummins manual. There is torque multiplication at low RPM with an auto that isn't there in a manual transmission. My point is that auto vs auto the PSD wins and auto vs manual the PSD actually has more torque because of torque multiplication.
Manual vs manual the Cummins has a slight low end advantage, but the torque curve of the PSD will give it a slight advantage over the Cummins. Also, someone posted recently that the Dodge tranny isn't even rated to handle 600 ft/lbs of torque. So much for mods!
Yes but that multiplication comes at a price. Why would you compare auto vs manual? They both make autos. They both make manuals. Compare em seprately. A 6 speed camaro is faster than an auto camaro. Why? Autos suck. Well they waste engergy.
In diesels its different. You lose your boost when you shift a manual. So autos become faster. Doesnt mean they are better. If your towing heavy. Id recommend a stick. They deliver better fuel economy.They are more reliable too. And cheaper.
The Cummins engine is speced in light and medium duty trucks, the PSD is not.
Yes it is. You can get the PSD, the 5.9 Cummins, or the 7.2 Cat in the F650/750. At that point the Cummins and PSD seem meaningless. Cat is the only way to go in an F650/750.
Manual vs manual the Cummins has a slight low end advantage, but the torque curve of the PSD will give it a slight advantage over the Cummins. Also, someone posted recently that the Dodge tranny isn't even rated to handle 600 ft/lbs of torque. So much for mods!
Nor is the zf rated for 560. Whatcha gonna do.
As for mods that little nv5600 handles 1000lb ft. It is the toughest tranny on the market when it comes to uprates.
In the past I was always partial to manual transmissions. My current truck has a ZF-5. With all of the effort being put into automatic transmissions like the Torqshift, my next truck will be an automatic, although that may be quite some time from now. My wife can't drive a manual which normally makes me happy, because she won't drive my truck. On 1000 mile trips though it gets old real quick.
Yes it is. You can get the PSD, the 5.9 Cummins, or the 7.2 Cat in the F650/750. At that point the Cummins and PSD seem meaningless. Cat is the only way to go in an F650/750.
Yes it would seem so. The F650's are way awesome but they are really unsuitable for the general pop. and whats the msrp? The big 3 make from the 1500 to the 3500 and mass produce them for the general purpose of the general population. Most people don't NEED an F650 for personal use. I can see general contracting and construction companies using them for business, but the big toys are usually towed with a semi anyway. Aren't the 650s and 750s mostly used by towing companies?
Yes it would seem so. The F650's are way awesome but they are really unsuitable for the general pop. and whats the msrp? The big 3 make from the 1500 to the 3500 and mass produce them for the general purpose of the general population. Most people don't NEED an F650 for personal use. I can see general contracting and construction companies using them for business, but the big toys are usually towed with a semi anyway. Aren't the 650s and 750s mostly used by towing companies?
My point was simply that in that size truck both the PSD and 5.9 Cummins become irrelevant. With the Caterpillar option why would you want the other two?
L.H., you are correct, the Torqshift is an option although you'll be hard pressed to find a 6-speed at a Ford dealer unless you order it.
My point was simply that in that size truck both the PSD and 5.9 Cummins become irrelevant. With the Caterpillar option why would you want the other two?
L.H., you are correct, the Torqshift is an option although you'll be hard pressed to find a 6-speed at a Ford dealer unless you order it.
On the Caterpillar note, yes I agree. Just the thought of owning one makes me giddy. On the Torqshift note, well like you guys said there is no benefit to having a manual on the PSD since the auto is so advanced. The Cummins on the other hand has no benefits in having an auto since it is proven less reliable, and less able to handle the torque compared to its own manual transmission option.
On the Caterpillar note, yes I agree. Just the thought of owning one makes me giddy. On the Torqshift note, well like you guys said there is no benefit to having a manual on the PSD since the auto is so advanced. The Cummins on the other hand has no benefits in having an auto since it is proven less reliable, and less able to handle the torque compared to its own manual transmission option.
I agree, but PSD/Torqshift vs Cummins/manual is not even close. The PSD has a huge advantage in that scenario. That's why I've been saying that Dodge needs to come up with an automatic transmission that competes with the Torqshift and Allison.
I agree, but PSD/Torqshift vs Cummins/manual is not even close. The PSD has a huge advantage in that scenario. That's why I've been saying that Dodge needs to come up with an automatic transmission that competes with the Torqshift and Allison.
Very true especially since Dodge is the underdog to begin with(with 2 less cylinders). Better yet they need to contract out someone elses transmission that is proven great or modify their own somehow to be bulletproof.
I've heard that Ford is actually working on a 6-speed auto. The Cummins could really benefit from a 6-speed auto to take advantage of the torque curve.
Yes but that multiplication comes at a price. Why would you compare auto vs manual? They both make autos. They both make manuals. Compare em seprately. A 6 speed camaro is faster than an auto camaro. Why? Autos suck. Well they waste engergy.
In diesels its different. You lose your boost when you shift a manual. So autos become faster. Doesnt mean they are better. If your towing heavy. Id recommend a stick. They deliver better fuel economy.They are more reliable too. And cheaper.
You know at one time you where correct but not anymore. Recommend a stick all you want but even the Dodge rates there auto as having more tow capacity. A 6 speed Camaro may be faster on a road course or the salt flats but at the drag strip its not.
All this is because of torque multiplication. The only way to muliply torque with a manual is to slip the clutch. With the lockup converters that comes with the newer trannys and computers that tie the engine and tranny togther the auto is a much better choice than manuals today. Who would of thought that an auto could provide engine braking.
You know at one time you where correct but not anymore. Recommend a stick all you want but even the Dodge rates there auto as having more tow capacity. A 6 speed Camaro may be faster on a road course or the salt flats but at the drag strip its not.
All this is because of torque multiplication. The only way to muliply torque with a manual is to slip the clutch. With the lockup converters that comes with the newer trannys and computers that tie the engine and tranny togther the auto is a much better choice than manuals today. Who would of thought that an auto could provide engine braking.
Good points tmyers. But the auto will always be more troublesome in the long haul. The auto will deliver poorer fuel economy. Be more costly to repair or replace. Not handle as much torque. There are other reasons why they use autos at the strip. A manual will always put more rpm to the wheels. If you go over ironmans post you will see why this is so important.
Sorry if you missed it. All transmissions multiply torque. The torque multiplication in the converter is shortlived. Its actually what destroys autos. If you slip the clutch its to get closer to peak hp. Not really necessary to slip the clutch on these new diesels. So much torque so soon. The torque multiplication in the torque converter is similar to slipping the clutch. It does enhance the torque at low rpm but is very wastefull at the same time. You sacrifice acceleration too due to this multiplication. Although it all sounds like its positive in reality its not. Very few torque converters are even 90% efficient. In reality most are more like 80%. Thats a pretty big waste of energy.
I am unable to locate specs which differentiate between the auto or the manual. Can you provide a link? I found where it says you can tow 23k with a 6 speed. I know you cant tow more than that with an auto. The payload is a little different because the manual weighs 200 lbs more. Its truly a medium duty manual.
Last edited by Logical Heritic; Aug 23, 2004 at 09:55 PM.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.