When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Maybe someone can chime in on a quench stepped piston vs. a plain D-cup dish. I've always been a D-cup man...
I can relate...
However, as far as pistons go, I really don't know the difference. They state they're for heavy duty (another site I saw said "UPS") and not for racing. I don't understand that stuff well enough yet to know why, without someone explaining it.
If you're feeling a little shifty you could order one each of a few 300 pistons, enough to get free shipping from Summit, have them CCed then return them. Just like dusting off and nuking the site from orbit it's the only way to be sure. All you'd be out is the cost of return shipping.
But that'll leave a cloud of vapor the size of Nebraska!
I'd thought about this and am considering it. Kinda sucks to pay to return them, but at least I'd know.
I DID, however, find a site that listed these specifically as 19cc pistons.
I know you are pretty thorough when it comes to the #'s. Just make sure to confirm the compression height on the pistons. There were one or two different pistons I've found used in some of the 70's 300's that were quite a bit shorter then most. It might be the one that was a true flat top with no dish or valve reliefs. I believe it was listed for either a 300 HD engine or a UPS 300. So just make sure the compression height is what you need.
I know you are pretty thorough when it comes to the #'s. Just make sure to confirm the compression height on the pistons. There were one or two different pistons I've found used in some of the 70's 300's that were quite a bit shorter then most. It might be the one that was a true flat top with no dish or valve reliefs. I believe it was listed for either a 300 HD engine or a UPS 300. So just make sure the compression height is what you need.
Thanks for the heads up. Yeah, I've been checking those pretty closely. They usually are either 1.778", 1.776", or 1.767". I do see a set of the flat top pistons you're talking about and they're 1.576" and would give me a nice 7.3:1 compression.
I just so happen to have a 240 head, a carb 300 head and efi 300 head on hand right now, plus a '96 short block with d-shaped dish hyper pistons. Out of curiosity I used a piece of clear plastic and a head gasket to trace the piston dish so I could see how it matched up to each of the heads. We talk about squish, so what gives?
The plastic was shiny and made getting good pictures a pain. But for what it's worth.
First, the EFI head
Then the 240 head
Finally, the 300 carb head:
Pretty obvious why Ford went to a D-shaped dish. It mates almost perfectly.
I'll answer for BVA: No, that is not the ridges of a fast burn chamber. That is simply the shape (heart shape) of an EFI head. A fast burn chamber has ridges around the valves that are meant to direct the gas flow, as in the photo below. The top chamber has the ridges; the bottom chamber has had them removed, and is polished. The top chamber has 1.94 intake valves, while the bottom one has 2.02 intakes.
In the third photo the chamber is oem and you can see the depth of the chamber opposite the spark plug. The chamber with the ridges has only had .020 removed. Quite a difference. I should mention the photo of the polished chamber was supplied by pmuller9, on the other forum. After he removed the ridges he cc'ed the chambers and came up up a 76cc chamber.
I also wanted to thank BVA for the photos. Your illustration makes me like the 351 SpeedPro piston in your link even more because of the oblong indentation.
Interesting, the chamber of the 240 head I've got looks pretty much identical to the chamber in that top picture - same ridges on the spark plug side. I'll get another picture in the a.m. without the plastic. I think you've got yourself a 240 head. Have you CCed the chambers?
Interesting, the chamber of the 240 head I've got looks pretty much identical to the chamber in that top picture - same ridges on the spark plug side. I'll get another picture in the a.m. without the plastic. I think you've got yourself a 240 head. Have you CCed the chambers?
I thought the 240 head had kidney bean shaped chambers. Nope, haven't cc'ed the chambers. I'm running it now. But will cc before and after when I remove the ridges.
So what's the squish height? How come you never tell us anything, Flashman?
I gave what I have, I never claimed to have built it, as I do not have any way to do so. Every thing listed here came from Old Man Johnson himself before he retired.
If you wish to know more, talk to Mike Johnson at, J.M.S.: R.E., i.e. Johnson Machine Service: Racing Engines, in El Monte, Ca. JMS Racing ? Since 1973 - Racing Engines and Vehicle Service
A fast burn chamber has ridges around the valves that are meant to direct the gas flow, as in the photo below. The top chamber has the ridges; the bottom chamber has had them removed, and is polished. The top chamber has 1.94 intake valves, while the bottom one has 2.02 intakes.
The slight ridges around the valve seats have nothing to do with the fast burn properties of the combustion chamber and indeed, can be found on both carbed and EFI heads (depending on the manufacturing variances). The heart shaped combustion chamber is the secret to fast burn, especially the "mask clearance" where the chamber wall closely shrouds the edge of the intake valve as the intake valve closes (and to a lesser extent, opens), imparting tangential swirl to the mixture which, in conjunction with the quench, which "jack-hammers" the macro swirling charge into many micro turbulent charges. Also useful to reduce emissions is the smaller surface-to-volume ratio of the chamber - something this dinosaur of an engine sorely needed.
Flashman, I was making a JOKE, pretending to quibble about a single dimension when you had typed out a whole bunch of dimensions.
Why is it that people take my words seriously only when I'm joking, and at no other time? But really, Flashman, you shouldn't take anything I say without several grains of salt, LOL.
There was a company that offered oversized valves that were a direct replacement ( length wise ) for the 300. I think the company was SI. But if I remember they discontinued them. But they still offer the SBC length valves.
The ones I'm looking at are some Manley ones. But they are kind of spendy $$$. And they are longer then the stock 300 ones. If you don't want to spend this much I'm pretty sure you can find basically the same thing for less from another brand.
There are two different part #'s for the intake valves. I can not find what the difference is between them. They appear to be the same valve. But one they say is for a Ford and the other is listed for a chevy.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.