Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Debugging slightly low boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 05:21 AM
  #46  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Once you capped the red line, the wastegate signal became irrelevant... you neutered that control signal. Taking infrequent samples of the wastegate PID leaves you with a long duration of the last sampling - making it appear to stay high or low for a long time (right through changing events).

I see you now have a significant gain in EBP and boost, but I also see leaks. You'll need to go on safari for boost and exhaust leaks - sorry.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 09:44 PM
  #47  
tjmike's Avatar
tjmike
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 1
I know I have to continue to hunt down leaks. I also want to check other possibilities in parallel.

Sorry if this is a bit random - I just wanted to get it out there....


I also need to step up may game some because it seems like it might be getting worse. Doing WOT runs with not much load I have been seeing MAP values of 28-29.5 or so. This is near red line on RPMS.

Pulling a trailer, at about 2300-2400 RPMS I'm seeing a max MAP of about 27. I **assume** that with now load at the higher RPM that the truck actually requires less air/fuel than the truck WOT at 2300 RPMs going up a hill. Does that seem reasonable?


One thing that confuses me is exhaust leaks. At max boost / WOT the wastegate "hole" is pretty big. It seems to me that as long as capping the red hose produces a larger difference in EBP vs uncapped that any exhaust leak will be overshadowed by the wast gate hole.


One other thing that I noticed is that my filter minder is starting to move. It's still much closer to the new side vs the replace side, but I wonder if it could be restricting the air flow enough have an impact. Might that explain being able to make more boost with a low load vs a high load?

When doing these WOT runs, do I want to take my foot out of it as soon as I see 1200 on the EGT gauge?

 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 07:16 AM
  #48  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Wastegate "hole"? With red line capped, it's now more of a wastegate "wall" - it's closed.

RPM redline? are you referring to another log? RPMs don't even reach 3000 on your graph. Redline is about 3250.



The "experts" say you can run your EGTs at 1250 (EGT redline) for a max of two minutes. There are a lot of variables at play, so it's an estimate. The concern is not a blast of hot air, the concern is "heat soak".

Heat soak: Light a lighter and just wave it by your palm at a distance of one inch. That's a WOT run, then a let-up. Now... hold that lighter under your palm for 5 seconds (in your imagination only - for readers that take everything literally). That's heat soak, that's damage, and that's like going up a grade for 5 minutes with EGTs at 1300 degrees while towing. Hot air is not the the thing, overheated metal is.

Boost/exhaust leaks make higher EGTs much easier than a sealed system. Fix the leaks, then revisit everything.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 06:58 PM
  #49  
tjmike's Avatar
tjmike
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Tugly
Wastegate "hole"? With red line capped, it's now more of a wastegate "wall" - it's closed.
Agreed. What I'm trying to say is that if it's possible to generate way more exhaust backpressure with the waste gate capped vs uncapped then any leak that might exist must be small in comparison to the virtual leak created by the wastegate. There must be some number (spread between max EBP plugged vs unplugged) that helps to gauge leaks on the exhaust side. For example if EBP can get typically get to 45 PSI with the WG plugged and 30 PSI with the WG unplugged, then the spread is 15PSI. If I can only make a spread of 7 PSI, then maybe I have a problem on the exhaust side. If I'm seeing 15PSI then I probably don't need to focus on exhaust side leaks.


I don't know if the above concept works, but it seems like something along those lines should.



Originally Posted by Tugly
RPM redline? are you referring to another log? RPMs don't even reach 3000 on your graph. Redline is about 3250.
Sorry. The above chart is just to show getting out of the throttle when EGTs hit 1200 or so.


My observation is that:
a) WOT at redline at ~55 MPH (at the 2nd to 3rd gear shift I think) I can seem MAP values of 28-29.

b) WOT at ~60MPH towing a trailer at 2500 RPMS I see a map more in the 26-27 range. Now this not apples to apples to a) but this operation is more real world (WOT pulling a hill at 50-65 mph).

I'm just wondering if there is anything the be learned by the difference between a and b other than higher RPM = More Boost?


Originally Posted by Tugly
The "experts" say you can run your EGTs at 1250 (EGT redline) for a max of two minutes. There are a lot of variables at play, so it's an estimate. The concern is not a blast of hot air, the concern is "heat soak".
Thanks, this is the magic number I was looking for. I get the heat soak issue too.




Originally Posted by Tugly
Boost/exhaust leaks make higher EGTs much easier than a sealed system. Fix the leaks, then revisit everything.
I've fixed every leak that can be found with the exception of a small manifold leak. Given that fixing a **much larger** up pipe leak changed nothing, I'm not too concerned about the pinhole (or smaller) manifold leak at this point. It seems like I have bigger fish to fry.

I'm just wondering if I'm chasing red herrings here. For example would it be possible that I can't hit max boost simply because my 5 year old AIS filter is a little clogged and the engine simply can't get enough air to make max power?
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 09:33 PM
  #50  
kbarbee95's Avatar
kbarbee95
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tugly
Stock tuning with some air mods and the red line capped:




I would focus exclusively on the anemic boost before I moved onto the EBP sensor. While the sensor is likely bad, that sucker ain't cheap.
Was this your stock hpop after a rebuild or still untouched? After how many miles too? I dont think my hpop hits that high, maybe that's why my truck doesnt like the higher hp tunes
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 12:24 AM
  #51  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
A plugged air filter will keep boost and EBP low. That sounds weird, but we've all heard a vacuum cleaner speed way up when the hose gets plugged. That's the air being evacuated from the compressor wheel, offering less resistance, and it takes less push to make the wheel spin faster. It's difficult to tell the difference from exhaust leak and plugged air filter with data alone - so a visual inspection for soot under the hood or a dirty air filter is needed.

A boost leak is a whole 'nother matter: The turbo is blowing far more air volume, so the EBP skyrockets and the boost... well.. doesn't.

A healthy truck with a stock turbo will show about 18 PSI boost (MAP 32-33 PSI at sea level), with EBP hovering above it with 37-43 PSI. The spread gets bigger with tunes: I've seen many stock turbos with 53 PSI EBP and 39 to 44 PSI MAP, but this can be deceiving because the EBP sensor maxes out at about 53 PSI. The back pressure can be higher and we have no way of knowing how much.

The graph was from Stock-ish Stinky with 240K miles on the HPOP. I was having an issue with ICP nosedives on tunes, and the T500 was recommended to fix the ICP. While the T500 was a huge improvement with the chipped truck, it didn't solve all my woes - the problem ended up being elsewhere.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:14 AM
  #52  
kbarbee95's Avatar
kbarbee95
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
You would have more back pressure with the red line off and plugged than on the wastegate plugged in. Your wording is a little confusing but I dont think it works like that
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 11:01 AM
  #53  
ExPACamper's Avatar
ExPACamper
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 32
From: Blairsville, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Tugly
A plugged air filter will keep boost and EBP low. That sounds weird, but we've all heard a vacuum cleaner speed way up when the hose gets plugged. That's the air being evacuated from the compressor wheel, offering less resistance, and it takes less push to make the wheel spin faster. It's difficult to tell the difference from exhaust leak and plugged air filter with data alone - so a visual inspection for soot under the hood or a dirty air filter is needed.

A boost leak is a whole 'nother matter: The turbo is blowing far more air volume, so the EBP skyrockets and the boost... well.. doesn't.

A healthy truck with a stock turbo will show about 18 PSI boost (MAP 32-33 PSI at sea level), with EBP hovering above it with 37-43 PSI. The spread gets bigger with tunes: I've seen many stock turbos with 53 PSI EBP and 39 to 44 PSI MAP, but this can be deceiving because the EBP sensor maxes out at about 53 PSI. The back pressure can be higher and we have no way of knowing how much.
^^Nuggets o' Gold^^

I've been seeing relationships and corridors of values indicating performance or lack thereof, but haven't zeroed in on the exact details. This post helps a LOT.

Saved, filed, in my reference library Thanks, Rich
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 07:22 PM
  #54  
tjmike's Avatar
tjmike
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 1
Yes, I found that post by tugly super useful too. Thanks!!!

Now, just to add to my confusion about my own truck. I finally saw 16 PSI of boost today and managed to capture a log for it. I have not changed anything. The EBP seems less noisy here too. I don't have any way to explain why.








Should I expect to see max boost pulling a hill with trailer (~8,000 lbs) at about 60 MPH? The MAX I can find in my logs is 14.32 PSI at 2898 RPM with MAP=28.5 and EBP 35.5.

Here's a comparison of two WOT runs:


<table style="border-collapse: collapse" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody><tr height="13"> <td height="13" width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">GEAR</td> <td class="xl24">SPEED</td> <td class="xl24">RPM</td> <td class="xl24">MAP</td> <td class="xl24">BOOST</td> <td class="xl24">EBP</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">2nd</td> <td class="xl24">37</td> <td class="xl24">2864</td> <td class="xl24">30.53</td> <td class="xl24">16.1</td> <td class="xl24">38.76</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">3rd</td> <td class="xl24">58</td> <td class="xl24">2898</td> <td class="xl24">28.54</td> <td class="xl24">14.32</td> <td class="xl24">35.57</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td height="13">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>

I would think that the 3rd gear run would require WAY more CFM than the 2nd gear run. Does this in any way help with my clogged air filter theory?

The air filter visibly looks fine. I guess I could weight it, but I don't know what a new one weighs....




I did have to roll off the throttle on hills quite a few times due to EGTs getting to 1250....
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 07:43 PM
  #55  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
what program/device are you using to data log?

are you sure your turbo has the stock wheel? Did the PO change turbo wheels by chance?

There is also the possibility of a partially stuck/closed EBPV.

Is it really stock if you are hitting 1200 EGT's?
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 08:58 PM
  #56  
tjmike's Avatar
tjmike
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by white Buffalo
what program/device are you using to data log?
These logs were with KIWI 2 and DashPro.



Originally Posted by white Buffalo
are you sure your turbo has the stock wheel? Did the PO change turbo wheels by chance?
I can't say for sure. The truck seems stock. I think the turbo had been out before though. The clamp for the up pipe collector was not a Ford one.

Wheel Photo:





Originally Posted by white Buffalo
There is also the possibility of a partially stuck/closed EBPV.
I recently did the up pipes, the EBPV lever was moving freely when I had the turbo off.


Originally Posted by white Buffalo
Is it really stock if you are hitting 1200 EGT's?
I'm assuming it's stock. I don't know how to tell for sure.



Here's a chart with EGT:

 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 09:41 PM
  #57  
kbarbee95's Avatar
kbarbee95
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tjmike
Yes, I found that post by tugly super useful too. Thanks!!!

Now, just to add to my confusion about my own truck. I finally saw 16 PSI of boost today and managed to capture a log for it. I have not changed anything. The EBP seems less noisy here too. I don't have any way to explain why.








Should I expect to see max boost pulling a hill with trailer (~8,000 lbs) at about 60 MPH? The MAX I can find in my logs is 14.32 PSI at 2898 RPM with MAP=28.5 and EBP 35.5.

Here's a comparison of two WOT runs:


<table style="border-collapse: collapse" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody><tr height="13"> <td height="13" width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">GEAR</td> <td class="xl24">SPEED</td> <td class="xl24">RPM</td> <td class="xl24">MAP</td> <td class="xl24">BOOST</td> <td class="xl24">EBP</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">2nd</td> <td class="xl24">37</td> <td class="xl24">2864</td> <td class="xl24">30.53</td> <td class="xl24">16.1</td> <td class="xl24">38.76</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">3rd</td> <td class="xl24">58</td> <td class="xl24">2898</td> <td class="xl24">28.54</td> <td class="xl24">14.32</td> <td class="xl24">35.57</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td height="13">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>

I would think that the 3rd gear run would require WAY more CFM than the 2nd gear run. Does this in any way help with my clogged air filter theory?

The air filter visibly looks fine. I guess I could weight it, but I don't know what a new one weighs....




I did have to roll off the throttle on hills quite a few times due to EGTs getting to 1250....
In the graph the first part where the ebp jumps up, the boost actually goes down a tiny bit and it happens again in the graph towards the end.

This seems like what Tugly was saying about the boost leaks, because the map drops 1 psi or so and ebp increases 5 psi. But I'm no expert with these data logs yet so I'm sure if im right someone will chime in soon

Have you replaced your intake boots or at least cleaned them?
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:18 PM
  #58  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
if your getting 16 psi on a stock setup then you are darn close to max, within 5% of max.

The problem I see is that you should not be seeing 1250 EGT's in a stock setup.
Could you take a pic of your air filter? Also see if Kiwi 2 or Dash Pro will allow you to monitor your Manifold air temps.

The data is a bit confusing and hard to read & see the colors. Any way to increase the line fonts?
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:21 PM
  #59  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by tjmike
.............Should I expect to see max boost pulling a hill with trailer (~8,000 lbs) at about 60 MPH? The MAX I can find in my logs is 14.32 PSI at 2898 RPM with MAP=28.5 and EBP 35.5.....
Not in OD, but close in 3rd. The issue again in my mind is your EGT's. With those higher rpm's I would expect to see more around the 1100 degree range.

The turbo pic looks good, looks clean and no oil or dirt build up
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 10:52 PM
  #60  
tjmike's Avatar
tjmike
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 584
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by white Buffalo
if your getting 16 psi on a stock setup then you are darn close to max, within 5% of max.
I got 16 PSI just once. Getting much above 14 (28.5 MAP) has been elusive.


Originally Posted by white Buffalo
The problem I see is that you should not be seeing 1250 EGT's in a stock setup.
Could you take a pic of your air filter?
Earlier, I said the filter was clean like new. I stand corrected. I'm sure it was all blue and pretty a few months ago. Now it's looking dirty:




The filter minder:




Top:




Originally Posted by white Buffalo
Also see if Kiwi 2 or Dash Pro will allow you to monitor your Manifold air temps.
I'm pretty sure it does. I'll add it to the PID list.

Originally Posted by white Buffalo
The data is a bit confusing and hard to read & see the colors. Any way to increase the line fonts?
I'll see what I can do, probably not until tomorrow though.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE