Debugging slightly low boost
I see you now have a significant gain in EBP and boost, but I also see leaks. You'll need to go on safari for boost and exhaust leaks - sorry.
Sorry if this is a bit random - I just wanted to get it out there....
I also need to step up may game some because it seems like it might be getting worse. Doing WOT runs with not much load I have been seeing MAP values of 28-29.5 or so. This is near red line on RPMS.
Pulling a trailer, at about 2300-2400 RPMS I'm seeing a max MAP of about 27. I **assume** that with now load at the higher RPM that the truck actually requires less air/fuel than the truck WOT at 2300 RPMs going up a hill. Does that seem reasonable?
One thing that confuses me is exhaust leaks. At max boost / WOT the wastegate "hole" is pretty big. It seems to me that as long as capping the red hose produces a larger difference in EBP vs uncapped that any exhaust leak will be overshadowed by the wast gate hole.
One other thing that I noticed is that my filter minder is starting to move. It's still much closer to the new side vs the replace side, but I wonder if it could be restricting the air flow enough have an impact. Might that explain being able to make more boost with a low load vs a high load?
When doing these WOT runs, do I want to take my foot out of it as soon as I see 1200 on the EGT gauge?
RPM redline? are you referring to another log? RPMs don't even reach 3000 on your graph. Redline is about 3250.
The "experts" say you can run your EGTs at 1250 (EGT redline) for a max of two minutes. There are a lot of variables at play, so it's an estimate. The concern is not a blast of hot air, the concern is "heat soak".
Heat soak: Light a lighter and just wave it by your palm at a distance of one inch. That's a WOT run, then a let-up. Now... hold that lighter under your palm for 5 seconds (in your imagination only - for readers that take everything literally). That's heat soak, that's damage, and that's like going up a grade for 5 minutes with EGTs at 1300 degrees while towing. Hot air is not the the thing, overheated metal is.
Boost/exhaust leaks make higher EGTs much easier than a sealed system. Fix the leaks, then revisit everything.
I don't know if the above concept works, but it seems like something along those lines should.
My observation is that:
a) WOT at redline at ~55 MPH (at the 2nd to 3rd gear shift I think) I can seem MAP values of 28-29.
b) WOT at ~60MPH towing a trailer at 2500 RPMS I see a map more in the 26-27 range. Now this not apples to apples to a) but this operation is more real world (WOT pulling a hill at 50-65 mph).
I'm just wondering if there is anything the be learned by the difference between a and b other than higher RPM = More Boost?
I'm just wondering if I'm chasing red herrings here. For example would it be possible that I can't hit max boost simply because my 5 year old AIS filter is a little clogged and the engine simply can't get enough air to make max power?
A boost leak is a whole 'nother matter: The turbo is blowing far more air volume, so the EBP skyrockets and the boost... well.. doesn't.
A healthy truck with a stock turbo will show about 18 PSI boost (MAP 32-33 PSI at sea level), with EBP hovering above it with 37-43 PSI. The spread gets bigger with tunes: I've seen many stock turbos with 53 PSI EBP and 39 to 44 PSI MAP, but this can be deceiving because the EBP sensor maxes out at about 53 PSI. The back pressure can be higher and we have no way of knowing how much.
The graph was from Stock-ish Stinky with 240K miles on the HPOP. I was having an issue with ICP nosedives on tunes, and the T500 was recommended to fix the ICP. While the T500 was a huge improvement with the chipped truck, it didn't solve all my woes - the problem ended up being elsewhere.
A boost leak is a whole 'nother matter: The turbo is blowing far more air volume, so the EBP skyrockets and the boost... well.. doesn't.
A healthy truck with a stock turbo will show about 18 PSI boost (MAP 32-33 PSI at sea level), with EBP hovering above it with 37-43 PSI. The spread gets bigger with tunes: I've seen many stock turbos with 53 PSI EBP and 39 to 44 PSI MAP, but this can be deceiving because the EBP sensor maxes out at about 53 PSI. The back pressure can be higher and we have no way of knowing how much.
I've been seeing relationships and corridors of values indicating performance or lack thereof, but haven't zeroed in on the exact details. This post helps a LOT.
Saved, filed, in my reference library
Thanks, Rich
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Now, just to add to my confusion about my own truck. I finally saw 16 PSI of boost today and managed to capture a log for it. I have not changed anything. The EBP seems less noisy here too. I don't have any way to explain why.
Should I expect to see max boost pulling a hill with trailer (~8,000 lbs) at about 60 MPH? The MAX I can find in my logs is 14.32 PSI at 2898 RPM with MAP=28.5 and EBP 35.5.
Here's a comparison of two WOT runs:
<table style="border-collapse: collapse" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody><tr height="13"> <td height="13" width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">GEAR</td> <td class="xl24">SPEED</td> <td class="xl24">RPM</td> <td class="xl24">MAP</td> <td class="xl24">BOOST</td> <td class="xl24">EBP</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">2nd</td> <td class="xl24">37</td> <td class="xl24">2864</td> <td class="xl24">30.53</td> <td class="xl24">16.1</td> <td class="xl24">38.76</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">3rd</td> <td class="xl24">58</td> <td class="xl24">2898</td> <td class="xl24">28.54</td> <td class="xl24">14.32</td> <td class="xl24">35.57</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td height="13">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
I would think that the 3rd gear run would require WAY more CFM than the 2nd gear run. Does this in any way help with my clogged air filter theory?
The air filter visibly looks fine. I guess I could weight it, but I don't know what a new one weighs....
I did have to roll off the throttle on hills quite a few times due to EGTs getting to 1250....
are you sure your turbo has the stock wheel? Did the PO change turbo wheels by chance?
There is also the possibility of a partially stuck/closed EBPV.
Is it really stock if you are hitting 1200 EGT's?
Wheel Photo:
I recently did the up pipes, the EBPV lever was moving freely when I had the turbo off.
I'm assuming it's stock. I don't know how to tell for sure.
Here's a chart with EGT:
Now, just to add to my confusion about my own truck. I finally saw 16 PSI of boost today and managed to capture a log for it. I have not changed anything. The EBP seems less noisy here too. I don't have any way to explain why.
Should I expect to see max boost pulling a hill with trailer (~8,000 lbs) at about 60 MPH? The MAX I can find in my logs is 14.32 PSI at 2898 RPM with MAP=28.5 and EBP 35.5.
Here's a comparison of two WOT runs:
<table style="border-collapse: collapse" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody><tr height="13"> <td height="13" width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> <td width="75">
</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">GEAR</td> <td class="xl24">SPEED</td> <td class="xl24">RPM</td> <td class="xl24">MAP</td> <td class="xl24">BOOST</td> <td class="xl24">EBP</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">2nd</td> <td class="xl24">37</td> <td class="xl24">2864</td> <td class="xl24">30.53</td> <td class="xl24">16.1</td> <td class="xl24">38.76</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td class="xl24" height="13">3rd</td> <td class="xl24">58</td> <td class="xl24">2898</td> <td class="xl24">28.54</td> <td class="xl24">14.32</td> <td class="xl24">35.57</td> </tr> <tr height="13"> <td height="13">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
I would think that the 3rd gear run would require WAY more CFM than the 2nd gear run. Does this in any way help with my clogged air filter theory?
The air filter visibly looks fine. I guess I could weight it, but I don't know what a new one weighs....
I did have to roll off the throttle on hills quite a few times due to EGTs getting to 1250....
This seems like what Tugly was saying about the boost leaks, because the map drops 1 psi or so and ebp increases 5 psi. But I'm no expert with these data logs yet so I'm sure if im right someone will chime in soon
Have you replaced your intake boots or at least cleaned them?
The problem I see is that you should not be seeing 1250 EGT's in a stock setup.
Could you take a pic of your air filter? Also see if Kiwi 2 or Dash Pro will allow you to monitor your Manifold air temps.
The data is a bit confusing and hard to read & see the colors. Any way to increase the line fonts?
The turbo pic looks good, looks clean and no oil or dirt build up
The filter minder:
Top:
I'll see what I can do, probably not until tomorrow though.






