Notices
Modular V10 (6.8l)  

99 2V Dyno'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #76  
NM04FORD's Avatar
NM04FORD
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 46
Have had my y pipe on now for about a week, 04 f350 cc sb 4x4 3.73 gears with hypertech tuner, k&n fipk and fm70 muffler. Did one on my brother in laws bone stock 01 f350 cc, lb 4x4 3.73 gears at the same time. We both notice better throttle response, less throttle needed to maintain speeds and to get the truck moving, no dyno runs though but seat of the pants feels good. Deffinetly worth the 90 bucks spent. Neither one of us have towed anything since the install. The pipe removed from the truck is a joke the way it is choked down, couldn't be good for power or mpg.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 03:25 AM
  #77  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

Guess what I'm saying is that I have a $39 Flowmaster Y-pipe. Y250300 (Was less when I bought it, I think.)




$90 plus the outlandish claims by that guy make me want to not give him any kudos.

I do I think anything is better than the factory piece.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #78  
chris60's Avatar
chris60
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Monsta
Guess what I'm saying is that I have a $39 Flowmaster Y-pipe. Y250300 (Was less when I bought it, I think.)




$90 plus the outlandish claims by that guy make me want to not give him any kudos.

I do I think anything is better than the factory piece.
That one looks real good, sure can't beat that price!
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #79  
bigford1's Avatar
bigford1
New User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek Ohio
To touch base on the choppy data numbers on the dyno, I spent about 4 hrs at a NED in Mass and they found it to be in the loop on how the motor is reading air/fuel. They guy that did my tune was a master programmer and wrote Ford code. He fixed it and I am looking for my dyno sheets to scan. It was communication between the MAF and what the O2 sensors were reading. I had a back fire and a lean condition at the higher end of the RPM range. Choopoy like what you saw. Now, all good, the tune I have is a custom tune, wiped out a chip and reprogrammed it. I think when it was all said and done, I picked up almost 50 hp and much more torque. Let me find my sheets so ya'll don't call me a fibber...
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #80  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Monsta
The eBay guy claims 33HP(!) with just the Y-pipe. He's obviously full of shee-it. Why anyone would want to continue to support his business now is beyond me.
Actually, 33HP at the flywheel is believable, if you're using "corrected" rear-wheel dyno results. Of course, we all know how accurate rear-wheel dynos are. Great for comparisons between mods on the SAME VEHICLE like fordmdb is doing, but overall not a completely accurate portrayal of what's happening at the flywheel. (Rear-wheel-dynos show more HP when you remove rotating weight like lighten the driveshaft or rear wheels/tires or remove the mechanical fan and replace it with an electrical fan. In reality, you haven't done anything to the actual amount of torque at the flywheel available at any one RPM. HP=Torque*RPM/5252. HP at the flywheel has nothing to do with engine acceleration).

I suspect what the restricted Y-pipe does is limit the acceleration of the crankshaft. Which is not really "flywheel HP".
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 02:03 AM
  #81  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

They don't claim flywheel HP & TRQ gains. SPDs site says

Originally Posted by SPD
After the installation of our Y Pipe, our customers are achieving 30 to 40 hp more (and 30 to 50 pounds more of torque). Made from mandrel bent piping, it creates a smoother, unrestricted meeting point of both header exhausts. Additionally, our customers have seen an increase of gas efficiency, averaging 2 mpg better. Here is what the Dyno Tests show on an F250 crew cab.

HP increase: 33 hp
Torque increase: 35 Ft. Lbs.

(The vehicle tested was considered "stock", not having any other modifications, alteration, or aftermarket products.)
Doubt they pulled the engine to test it.

I'm not even seeing a 33HP with a custom tune.

While its a great mod, I think the performance gain claims are crap, that's all.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:43 AM
  #82  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Monsta
While its a great mod, I think the performance gain claims are crap, that's all.
Of course they are. And I can safely bet that they are "adjusted flywheel" numbers. Did you get your tuned X dynoed?
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #83  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Krewat
Of course they are.
It's the same with every CAI, catback exhaust and TB spacer "power gain" claim.
JL
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:56 AM
  #84  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa


^^^^ The Y-pipe from flowmaster may cost around $40 but to have an exhaust shop bend up the pipes and install everything its going to cost a bit more than $100 at most places. Then in most cases you end up with collapsed bends like in the picture that hurts flow. The stock Y pipe is mandrel bent and just replacing the restricted section works well and is easily doable with no bending.

I can believe the 33hp 35tq claims for the 01-04 pipe isn't impossible especially if they calculate flywheel numbers. Remember where the claims come from however. They advertise the best gain at any one point on the entire hp and torque curve not at the peaks. For example the 30 hp gain could be at 1200rpm and the 35tq gain could be at 5000rpm. Not at the peak of either curve but at one given point. Thats how Banks gets there claimed numbers. Its marketing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #85  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by dkf
Not at the peak of either curve but at one given point.
Yes, that's absolutely right... I was amazed that Superchips, for my 4.6L '96 t-bird, only advertised like a 12ft/lbs PEAK increase in torque.

The fun was the 32ft/lbs increase at lower and higher RPMs that was obvious on their dyno chart. Calculated "flywheel" numbers, but the increase was very noticeable at other parts of the curve.

Maybe their marketing people didn't know what they were doing

Anyway, back the dyno thread - this stuff is way
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #86  
chris60's Avatar
chris60
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by dkf


^^^^ The Y-pipe from flowmaster may cost around $40 but to have an exhaust shop bend up the pipes and install everything its going to cost a bit more than $100 at most places. Then in most cases you end up with collapsed bends like in the picture that hurts flow. The stock Y pipe is mandrel bent and just replacing the restricted section works well and is easily doable with no bending.

I can believe the 33hp 35tq claims for the 01-04 pipe isn't impossible especially if they calculate flywheel numbers. Remember where the claims come from however. They advertise the best gain at any one point on the entire hp and torque curve not at the peaks. For example the 30 hp gain could be at 1200rpm and the 35tq gain could be at 5000rpm. Not at the peak of either curve but at one given point. Thats how Banks gets there claimed numbers. Its marketing.
When I bought my ebay pipe, the 99/00 did not have the same claims as the 01-04 pipe, & thats what this dyno run was all about, the 99/00 yrs without the choked down pipe that was supposed to remove flutter. I just checked the ebay site & did not even see the 99 pipe any more. Any how, I was impressed with these results, tuned & not tuned , it confirmed what I had felt in the drivers seat. It's all good !
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #87  
chris60's Avatar
chris60
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by chris60
When I bought my ebay pipe, the 99/00 did not have the same claims as the 01-04 pipe, & thats what this dyno run was all about, the 99/00 yrs without the choked down pipe that was supposed to remove flutter. I just checked the ebay site & did not even see the 99 pipe any more. Any how, I was impressed with these results, tuned & not tuned , it confirmed what I had felt in the drivers seat. It's all good !
oops, I now see the claim for 99-00 pipe...sorry Monsta !!

http://www.spdperformance.com/
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #88  
dew the thunder's Avatar
dew the thunder
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: South Bend, IN
Hey Mike. I forgot to ask you when I called earlier... I was thinking about getting a new valve body. How well would a good tune be compared to a valve body or would both be a great thing to do?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #89  
5 Star Tuning's Avatar
5 Star Tuning
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 76
From: South Carolina
Do the tune first , if you feel you need the valve body then do it.
I did a valve body on our 7.3 and was not completely happy with it

Mike
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 07:11 PM
  #90  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Forget the valve body unless your willing to get the truck on a dyno for custom tuning or have the software and knowhow to tweak it yourself. Been there with the VB and its a PITA to get it dialed in right or at least to my liking. Thats why I pulled it off. Anyone who is interested in a FT VB PM me. You can however leave the trans stock and still run the accumulator upgrade but the converter still locks slow then. You would have to get a lockup valve kit to get the TQ to lock quicker.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE