Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #181  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
Google Al Gore?
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #182  
Ryan50hrl's Avatar
Ryan50hrl
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 4
From: Neenah, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
Google Al Gore?
Clearly you didn't read it....Active serving Democrat......i'm waiting
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #183  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
Originally Posted by Ryan50hrl
UAW.....any more questions?
Biggest copout I've heard in a long time.

Does the UAW set marketing strategies, decide on product lines, ect.,ect.,ect.

No, they don't. It's people that make 30 million a year.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #184  
Ryan50hrl's Avatar
Ryan50hrl
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 4
From: Neenah, Wisconsin
The UAW costs ford and gm more money than you can possibly imagine.....if ford and gm didn't have to be paying for guys who are "laid off" to be sitting doing crossword puzzles....and for BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars of benifits that other workers dont get each and every year....those trucks that you continue to complain about being so dang expensive....would be a few thousand dollars cheaper.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #185  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
So now the UAW is to blame for this countries health care, and retirement policies?

I agree there are some very egregious benefits in their contracts. But who signed these contracts? I believe the CEO's have to approve, and sign them? So who's really to blame?

I've read that health care bennies cost $1500 per vehicle. More than the steel to build the bodies.

Neither Ford, or the UAW decides what the Ins. companies charge. Another major problem for this country. A huge drag on every person in USA.

By the way, PBS showed some of the Mansions that the major Ins company CEO's live in. If thats not a disgrace, I don't know what is. Babies dying because their parents can't afford Health Care. And these guys living in gold plated houses.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #186  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ryan50hrl
The UAW costs ford and gm more money than you can possibly imagine.....if ford and gm didn't have to be paying for guys who are "laid off" to be sitting doing crossword puzzles....and for BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars of benifits that other workers dont get each and every year....those trucks that you continue to complain about being so dang expensive....would be a few thousand dollars cheaper.....
This is so true. I see a thing on tv about the new Honda factory that is opening and they said that they was going to be paying the people $18hr and ford gets something like $28hr so how on earth the big 3 are going to be able to compete with that i will never know. They are in trouble for this exact reason and they think the bailout is going to help? I don't know sod all about this kind of thing but i know that when one company is paying people that much more to do the same job then they wont be in business for much longer. Good wages are great but worth nothing if the company cant afford to do it and goes under. They must be able to figure this out on their own!
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #187  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 39,979
Likes: 1,512
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
I know You can get into a nice F250 for less than $30K
All F-250's are nice. Are we talking XLT's, Lariats, or XL work trucks. Everything I see on the lots are fully equipped mac daddy 48k trucks.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #188  
WhëëlMå1's Avatar
WhëëlMå1
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,547
Likes: 6
From: MA
Club FTE Gold Member
Folks... one last shot to get back to the performance aspects of the 09 F150... or she's getting locked down. All of these other intermingled topics can be discussed in 'the club', general convo, etc.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #189  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
Well, go try and buy a Honda Fit. They've doubled the plant output, and still a 2-3 Mo waiting list here in Mn.

Go look at a Ford lot. 150 F150's sitting on the lot.

Pretty simple if You ask Me.

Sherm, with the F150 becoming the baby F250 it's not only eating 250 sales, it's keeping the truck from being what it's supposed to be. A 1/2 TON TRUCK.

It's come to this from short sighted planning on Fords part. Years of trying to outdo the other guys has brought the once best selling pickup in the country to a $30-40K 6K Lb custom cruiser.
C'mon guy's it's supposed to be a truck, not a Lincoln. I can get just as comfortable in my 93 as an 09. Just because people are using them for commuters does not make it the right choice. Like I stated it's, time to come out of the caveman days, make some socially responsible decisions. Driving a 16 MPG Truck as a daily commuter is just not the best decision a person could make. BUT a 25 MPG truck would be a better decision.

The world is changing right before our eye's. If You care to look the other way, Fine.

It's going to be a little scary to see what happens when the Big 3 get their tax dollars, and the Dems come into power. Most Dems have allready said that gas prices should be $5.00/Gal. Just to force peeps into conserving, and force alternative energy into the forefront. They'll prolly tax it till it reaches $5.00 and then fund alternative energy programs?

Have fun filling Your 6K lb custom cruiser then.
Are you honestly suggesting that the number of F-150s on a dealer's lot is an indication of decreased consumer demand? That is ridiculous.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:10 PM
  #190  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
For crying out loud, wake up!
Any person that cant see the decline in truck sales, and the increase in small car sales, is either an idiot, or blind.
Why are the USDM companies selling NEW 08 Trucks for less than $20K. Cause they're feeling generous?

Why is Honda doing just fine and Ford is going down the crapper?

I know You can get into a nice F250 for less than $30K
Why is Honda doing fine you ask?
  • no UAW
  • corporate diversity
  • factory design which reduces time to re-tool
  • quality: actual and perceived
  • managerial staff
  • different corporate policies

Shall I go on?
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #191  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
In before lock

 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #192  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
By the way, PBS showed some of the Mansions that the major Ins company CEO's live in. If thats not a disgrace, I don't know what is. Babies dying because their parents can't afford Health Care. And these guys living in gold plated houses.
Is that jealousy I hear? Who cares what kind of house they live in? If the CEO is successful and doing their job correctly there is nothing wrong with a healthy compensation package. On the flip side, if the CEO drives the company into the ground they certainly should not get any bonuses or anything like that.

Are you actually suggesting that the kind of house that a CEO lives in is to blame for other people not having a job or not having a good enough job to afford health care? That is the funniest damn thing I've heard all day. Let me guess, there are babies dying because I blew 20 bucks on lunch today? Am I correct in assuming that you feel that it is our responsibility to ensure that everybody has heath care no matter their income level? What a joke. Sorry, but if you don't make enough to have the same health care coverage that I do, that is not my problem. The great thing about America is that there is the freedom to get a better job and work hard to better yourself.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 01:12 AM
  #193  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
I wont go into the politics that are involved. All's I know is Health ins shouldn't cost a family of 4 $1200 a mo. Just as a decently equipped 1/2 ton truck shouldn't cost $30K+.

Back on topic. My point was/is that the F150 needs to go on a 1500lb diet. That way no one would complain about 320 HP. It would get far better fuel economy. And Ford would sell many more trucks, than they will the truck they're offering now. Especially with the the economy the way it is. They wouldn't have to lay off 1/2 of their work force. Sucking more money out of the unemployment coffers. There would be more taxes in the coffers thru sales, income taxs. Their employees would be out there spending money, instead of hunkering down on unemployment. Thus helping, instead of hurting, the economy overall.

Can You comprehend? Or do You want to argue some more?
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #194  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 39,979
Likes: 1,512
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
I wont go into the politics that are involved. All's I know is Health ins shouldn't cost a family of 4 $1200 a mo. Just as a decently equipped 1/2 ton truck shouldn't cost $30K+.

Back on topic. My point was/is that the F150 needs to go on a 1500lb diet. That way no one would complain about 320 HP. It would get far better fuel economy. And Ford would sell many more trucks, than they will the truck they're offering now. Especially with the the economy the way it is. They wouldn't have to lay off 1/2 of their work force. Sucking more money out of the unemployment coffers. There would be more taxes in the coffers thru sales, income taxs. Their employees would be out there spending money, instead of hunkering down on unemployment. Thus helping, instead of hurting, the economy overall.

Can You comprehend? Or do You want to argue some more?
I was all for that diet thing until I saw the wash board test on the u-tube video that was posted awhile ago. Such a diet would weaken the truck to a dismal level of unacceptance. Meanwhile the competition would kill ford in build quality while Ford would say "we get great gas mileage".

I accept lower overall power ratings and all that other bile that is being spewed about the "gutless" 5.4L and such to have a truck that can do the same job as the others and still be tops in build quality. Viva Le Ford!

Tim
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #195  
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, Mn.
Peeps would be lined up around the block for a truck that got 25 MPG RIGHT NOW!
Even if it didn't tow 11K.

Pick up sales are down over 30% in the past 2 years. Down 39% comparing Nov. 07 and 08. Let's see how many peeps are going to come out for a new F150.

Personally, I think they're way off base with what the public wants.

You don't need a fully boxed frame to be Tough. You don't need a soundproof cabin, to be Tough, You don't need 19"wheels to be Tough, the list goes on. All add weight, and cost to a TRUCK. They could offer all of that in their $50K Platinum, and leave the rest of the trucks, to be trucks.
With the technology available today, Ford could build a strong enough frame that the fully boxed could go out the window. They could hydroform a frame plenty strong enough. Get the towing number back where it belongs for a 1/2 ton, and advertise Fuel Millage, instead.

They made a conscious decision to build this truck with 320 HP. Towing 11.5K. Just because it's the only thing the truck will out do the competition at. F the competition, build something that people will buy en'mass. A 1/2 ton truck that tows 8K and gets 25 MPG.

IMO: The American public isn't going to buy in these tough times when it does absolutely nothing to help them out economically. If they could save 5 MPG then it could sway their buying decision towards whoever offers them a little savings.

I've seen 4 guys post up their new trucks. It should be more like 400 by now?

Ford is hanging their hat on a truck that they've already been building for years, The F250
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE