Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

6.7 Spotted Undergoing Testing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #46  
herman391's Avatar
herman391
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: Leamington, Ontario
Originally Posted by IHpuller450
In my opinion Ford has made a giant mistake dropping navistar. Now we may end up with years and years of diesel engine problems because ford is just now making its own diesels for this application, yes i know that they produce other size diesels, but hasnt it been proven that the only reason that the 6.0 had trouble was because ford refused to use the electronic specifications Navistar recomended. now im a ford fan and an IH fan and it just breaks my heart that we are loosing the best combination of diesel truck/engine suppliers

--just my two cents.
It hasn't been proven yet, that's why the 2 companies keep suing each other over warranty costs for the 6.0. I think all these lawsuits are the reason that ford decided it was time to kick navistar to the curb.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #47  
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 50
From: Texas
Originally Posted by IHpuller450
... ford refused to use the electronic specifications Navistar recomended.
Kind of interesting isn't it. Ford can tune a Navistar engine for performance modifications, but Ford won't allow their customers to tune the Ford product.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #48  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by F350-6
Kind of interesting isn't it. Ford can tune a Navistar engine for performance modifications, but Ford won't allow their customers to tune the Ford product.
Neither Ford or Navistar want the bill for problems caused by unauthorized modifications to their products.
Much as the Cummins and Dodge arrangement, Fords 7.3 - 6.0 power ratings were promoted on Navistars own website through the end of 6.0 production, so doubtful anything there was without approval.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #49  
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 50
From: Texas
Originally Posted by origcharger
Neither Ford or Navistar want the bill for problems caused by unauthorized modifications to their products.
Much as the Cummins and Dodge arrangement, Fords 7.3 - 6.0 power ratings were promoted on Navistars own website through the end of 6.0 production, so doubtful anything there was without approval.
I agree with what you're saying, but I was under the impression Ford did bump up the numbers in both the 7.3 & 6.0. I thought Navistars approval was really more of an acceptance after negotiations with Ford on what would wear the PSD badge.

Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #50  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by F350-6
I agree with what you're saying, but I was under the impression Ford did bump up the numbers in both the 7.3 & 6.0. I thought Navistars approval was really more of an acceptance after negotiations with Ford on what would wear the PSD badge.
The Ford light truck applications of the 7.3 & 6.0 do have differant torque, rpm and horsepower ratings than in the medium truck applications. Light truck units typically had more horsepower and higher rpm ranges and medium trucks had more torque at lower rpms.
Whose to say Navistar didn't design them for the Ford light truck ratings and "turn them down" for the medium truck market?
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #51  
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 50
From: Texas
Originally Posted by origcharger
Whose to say Navistar didn't design them for the Ford light truck ratings and "turn them down" for the medium truck market?
Well that sounds bass akwards, which means it very well may be true. I never though about it from that angle.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #52  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
The hideous torque @ around 1400rpms that the commercial versions of the VT365 make is a lot more strain than the 325hp that the 6.0l makes too...
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #53  
2003 6.0's Avatar
2003 6.0
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
I wish Ford would offer two engine brands. International and Cat. Ford is making a big mistake if they do drop Navistar. The 6.0 is a durable engine with crappy electronics. They need to just settle this problem and just move on.

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old May 31, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #54  
rollerstud98's Avatar
rollerstud98
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 4
From: Airdrie Alberta
Club FTE Silver Member

its not the electronics, its the failed head gaskets due to weak head bolts and being short changed on head bolts too, that to me is the biggest problem and is not because of Ford, thats all Navistar since they designed the motor.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #55  
c00nhunterjoe's Avatar
c00nhunterjoe
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,608
Likes: 13
From: Belair md
Originally Posted by 2003 6.0
I wish Ford would offer two engine brands. International and Cat. Ford is making a big mistake if they do drop Navistar. The 6.0 is a durable engine with crappy electronics. They need to just settle this problem and just move on.

they do, you just have to buy a 650 to get a cummins, cat, or international
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #56  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
Why does everyone think a cat engine would be the bomb?????

You take a cat engine, build up your front suspension to hold it, then add a new PCM to rev it higher for the 4/5 spd tranny, THEN, see how reliable it is.

The 7.3 and 6.0 were both successful for international in larger trucks than the f-series.

What happens if you'd tune a ferrari engine to run low RPM's for more tourque????

Ford tunes the international into a "powerstroke" engine, higher tourque band to help the tranny stay together, and a wider power band to help the truck power through all the gears nicely.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #57  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
I was looking at internationals site the other day, their version of the 6.4 makes significantly less power then the 6.4 PSD.

They come in a few varieties from 200 - 230 HP and 560-620 ft-lbs of torque. They only have a torque/power curve chart for the low end one, its quite a bit different then the PSD power band, thats for sure.

It makes peak torque at 560 ft-lbs @ 1400 RPM, then its perfectly flat till around 1680 RPM then nose dives off and starts dropping very fast, ending with 350 ft-lbs @ 2800 RPM

Peak HP is 200 HP reached at 2200 RPMs, then its perfectly flat all the way to 2600 RPM, then drops down to around 175-180HP @ 2840 RPM

Just going by how the torque and power curves each have this spot that is perfectly flat suggests the engines are artificially limited.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #58  
IHpuller450's Avatar
IHpuller450
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
you know what i think would be really nice? an option with ford and navistar to pick between a V-8 and an I-6 when you order your truck.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #59  
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 50
From: Texas
Originally Posted by IHpuller450
you know what i think would be really nice? an option with ford and navistar to pick between a V-8 and an I-6 when you order your truck.
If they did that, do you really think they would sell any V-8's?
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #60  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
I think they would, people love v8 diesels. Among us, there are a few fans of I6's, but not passionate enough to buy a dodge......

v8's are more refined and plus the way people think, 8 is better than 6. If there was a v10, people would buy that too IMHO.....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE