Unofficial Modification Thread

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 17, 2007 | 06:03 PM

#166

1997F-350

Postmaster

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,948

Likes: 2

From: SHELTON, WA

interesting thread here.
anyone up for a wa dyno day i will film it?

Sep 17, 2007 | 06:15 PM

#167

c00nhunterjoe

Lead Driver

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 8,608

Likes: 13

From: Belair md

that is a lot of fuel for me to burn........

Sep 17, 2007 | 07:29 PM

#168

lukecline

Posting Guru

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 1,190

Likes: 0

From: minneapolis, ks

Quote:

Originally Posted by glasseater

better get an ice pack for that BURN!!! seriously though i don't think an IC helps THAT much... i think MAYBE 40 hp... which yeah that's noticable but that still allows pretty good numbers

dyno now and then install a nice big ic and tell me that they dont help. Cooler air is denser, or more o2 molecules per cfm. Even if you run the same boost pressure with an intercooler that you did without an ic, your hp ahead due to the fact the ic is cooling the air 200-300* maybe more. More o2 = more hp. Why dont you ask ernesteugne or what ever his name is to do a nice little calculation for you. He is very smart with that stuff and im sure he'd love to shed some light on this for you. In fact i'll shoot him a pm asking for his input.

Sep 17, 2007 | 07:37 PM

#169

c00nhunterjoe

Lead Driver

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 8,608

Likes: 13

From: Belair md

simple test would be do a dyno run with the stock y-pipe then pop the x-pipe back on and re-run the dyno

Sep 17, 2007 | 07:48 PM

#170

lukecline

Posting Guru

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 1,190

Likes: 0

From: minneapolis, ks

yes, that would make it so you could do runs back to back the same day. I just sent a pm to ernesteugene asking for his input, im really curious to see how the math works out.

Sep 17, 2007 | 08:49 PM

#171

c00nhunterjoe

Lead Driver

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 8,608

Likes: 13

From: Belair md

12.52 @108, thats sad your truck runs with my car.... got video of that?

Sep 17, 2007 | 09:29 PM

#172

lukecline

Posting Guru

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 1,190

Likes: 0

From: minneapolis, ks

Here's a 12.62@ 109.9 run. I didnt get the 12.52 on tape. Rwhp was roughly 660 rwhp based on trap speed and weight.

http://video.ford-trucks.com/video/856274e2-56d3-460e-a5f8-988100e57fb5.htm

Last edited by lukecline; Sep 17, 2007 at 09:35 PM.

Sep 17, 2007 | 09:59 PM

#173

c00nhunterjoe

Lead Driver

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 8,608

Likes: 13

From: Belair md

insanity on wheels, i want a dose of that. i'd be had to crack a 13.99 run in mine

FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Joe Kucinski

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Brett Foote

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

Pouria Savadkouei

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Brett Foote

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Joe Kucinski

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Michael S. Palmer

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Verdad Gallardo

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Joe Kucinski

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Brett Foote

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Joe Kucinski

Sep 17, 2007 | 10:29 PM

#174

RubberDuck

Logistics Pro

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 4,137

Likes: 41

From: Marble Falls, Texas

Luke, your mail box is full...

Sep 18, 2007 | 12:34 PM

#175

lukecline

Posting Guru

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 1,190

Likes: 0

From: minneapolis, ks

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...tercooler.html

There's ernesteugenes response to my question. Its a long one, but he got it done!

Sep 18, 2007 | 11:30 PM

#176

RubberDuck

Logistics Pro

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 4,137

Likes: 41

From: Marble Falls, Texas

Wow, that guys got alot of time on his hands. Nicely done though.

Sep 19, 2007 | 07:36 AM

#177

barebackjake

Postmaster

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,864

Likes: 0

From: STEPHENVILLE,TX!!!!!

damn what is the guy a rocket scientist?? lol great work, its nice to see the info on paper.

now lets just see that from the 7.3 ic to the 6oh spearco???

Sep 19, 2007 | 09:32 AM

#178

fast83

Senior User

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 148

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by lukecline

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...tercooler.html

There's ernesteugenes response to my question. Its a long one, but he got it done!

There is now much more info here this is a great thread

Sep 19, 2007 | 06:31 PM

#179

powerstroked162

Postmaster

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 3,658

Likes: 0

From: Ellensburg, Washington

Gene has always been known to be somewhat of a genius when it comes to math and research. So it dosn't suprise me the least

Cowboy Steve

Sep 19, 2007 | 08:38 PM

#180

tubzz

Freshman User

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 40

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerstroked162

420rwhp was on fuel, 472rwhp on No2. I made 493rwhp with a 200 shot and open intake the week before last

So im really only seein 81rwhp gain with a 200 shot, WTF is that about?

Cowboy Steve

sorry their cowboy steve,but i have to call BS on that, show me to change my mine.

and your truck at the track will get you in the high 13's